The article explores the advantages of hierarchical robot swarm structures over traditional egalitarian swarm approaches. It demonstrates that while egalitarian swarms excel in environments proportionate to their collective sensing abilities, they struggle in larger or more complex settings. Hierarchical swarms, on the other hand, extend their sensing reach efficiently, proving successful in larger, more unstructured environments with fewer resources.
The key findings are:
Egalitarian swarms require a robot count proportional to the complexity of the environment or task to achieve consistent mission success, facing diminishing returns as the number of robots increases.
Hierarchical swarms, where select "guide" robots perceive the global state and objectives, can scale robot swarms cost-effectively. Guides aggregate local information for tiered decision-making, avoiding expensive or impractical overdesign.
Hierarchical swarms achieve similar levels of parallelism as worker swarms, with the added advantage of effectively sharing information. The enhanced performance of the guides leads to higher success rates and shorter mission completion times, with fewer robots and reduced cost.
The Poisson model can be used to properly size a swarm for a given application, accounting for cost and time to complete its task. This model-based projection could serve as a template for system design.
Real-world experiments validate the simulation findings, accounting for the "reality gap" and demonstrating the practical applicability of hierarchical swarm structures.
Overall, the results suggest that hierarchical robot swarm structures are a cost-effective and scalable deployment strategy compared to traditional egalitarian approaches, particularly in complex or large-scale environments.
إلى لغة أخرى
من محتوى المصدر
arxiv.org
الرؤى الأساسية المستخلصة من
by Vivek Shanka... في arxiv.org 05-07-2024
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2405.02417.pdfاستفسارات أعمق