Kernekoncepter
Large language models (LLMs) hold immense potential for revolutionizing healthcare, but their successful implementation requires a structured approach encompassing task formulation, model selection, prompt engineering, fine-tuning, and careful consideration of deployment factors like regulatory compliance, equity, and cost.
This research paper presents a practical framework for integrating large language models (LLMs) into the medical field. Recognizing the transformative potential of LLMs, the authors address the lack of actionable guidelines for their application in healthcare.
Task Formulation
The authors emphasize understanding the core capabilities of LLMs, categorizing them into:
Knowledge and reasoning: Answering medical questions, supporting clinical decisions, and matching patients to clinical trials.
Summarization: Condensing clinical notes and medical literature.
Translation: Sharing medical knowledge across languages and facilitating communication.
Structurization: Converting free-text into structured data, such as diagnosis codes.
Multi-modality: Analyzing and integrating diverse data types, including text, images, and genomic information.
Large Language Model Selection
Choosing the right LLM is crucial and depends on:
Task and Data: Ensuring the model aligns with the specific medical task and data type, including considerations for privacy and compliance when handling sensitive patient information.
Performance Requirements: Evaluating the model's medical capabilities through benchmarks and clinical evaluations.
Model Interface: Determining the appropriate access point, whether through web applications, APIs, or locally hosted implementations, considering factors like control, privacy, and cost.
Prompt Engineering
This section highlights techniques for optimizing LLM performance:
Few-shot learning: Providing a few examples within the prompt to guide the model.
Chain-of-thought prompting: Encouraging step-by-step reasoning for complex medical decision-making.
Retrieval-augmented generation: Incorporating relevant documents to enhance accuracy and reduce hallucinations.
Tool learning: Integrating domain-specific tools, such as database utilities.
Temperature setting: Controlling the randomness of generated responses.
Output formatting: Using structured formats like JSON for easy parsing.
Fine-tuning
While prompt engineering is often sufficient, fine-tuning, either full or partial (PEFT), becomes necessary when:
Prompt engineering fails to achieve desired results.
High-quality training data is abundant.
The working prompt is too costly due to length.
Deployment Considerations
Deploying LLMs in healthcare settings requires addressing:
Regulatory compliance: Adhering to privacy standards like HIPAA and GDPR.
Equity and fairness: Evaluating and mitigating potential biases in training data and algorithms.
Costs: Considering usage fees for proprietary models versus hardware and maintenance costs for open-source models.
Post-deployment monitoring: Ensuring responsible use, providing training for healthcare professionals, and actively engaging with patients and communities for feedback.
Conclusion
The authors provide a roadmap for the responsible and effective integration of LLMs in medicine, emphasizing a systematic approach to harness their power while addressing ethical and practical considerations. This framework serves as a valuable guide for healthcare professionals navigating the evolving landscape of AI in medicine.
Statistik
One token is about 0.8 words.
Llama 3 has a limited context window of 8,000 tokens, about 20 abstracts.
GPT-4 has a 128k tokens context window, processing approximately 320 PubMed articles.
Claude 3 has a 200k tokens context window, processing approximately 800 PubMed articles.
Gemini 1.5 Pro has a 1M tokens context window, processing approximately 2,500 PubMed articles.
OpenAI's GPT-4 model costs $0.03 per 1,000 prompt tokens and $0.06 per 1,000 completion tokens.