toplogo
Log på

Improving Out-of-Domain Generalization in ASR Models Using Decoder-Centric Regularization


Kernekoncepter
Regularizing the decoder module of encoder-decoder ASR models with auxiliary classifiers improves robustness, generalization to out-of-domain scenarios, and enables rapid domain adaptation.
Resumé

Bibliographic Information:

Polok, A., Kesiraju, S., Beneš, K., Burget, L., & ˇCernocký, J. (2024). Improving Automatic Speech Recognition with Decoder-Centric Regularisation in Encoder-Decoder Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.17437.

Research Objective:

This research paper investigates whether a simple regularization method applied to the decoder module of encoder-decoder Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) systems can improve their robustness and generalization capabilities, particularly in out-of-domain scenarios.

Methodology:

The authors propose a novel method called Decoder-Centric Regularisation in Encoder-Decoder (DeCRED) architecture for ASR. This method introduces auxiliary classifiers in the intermediate layers of the decoder module during training. The researchers then evaluate the performance of DeCRED against a baseline encoder-decoder model and other state-of-the-art ASR systems like Whisper and OWSM. The evaluation includes both in-domain and out-of-domain datasets, focusing on Word Error Rate (WER) as the primary metric. Additionally, the authors analyze the internal language model of the trained models using Zero-Attention Internal Language Model (ILM) perplexity estimation to understand the impact of the proposed regularization scheme.

Key Findings:

  • DeCRED consistently outperforms the baseline encoder-decoder model in both in-domain and out-of-domain scenarios, demonstrating improved robustness and generalization capabilities.
  • The proposed method achieves competitive WERs compared to significantly larger models like Whisper-medium and outperforms OWSM v3, even with a fraction of the training data and model size.
  • DeCRED shows significant WER reductions on out-of-domain datasets like AMI (2.7% absolute reduction) and Gigaspeech (2.9% absolute reduction).
  • Rapid domain adaptation using DeCRED further reduces WER on out-of-domain datasets.
  • Analysis of the internal language model reveals that DeCRED leads to better generalization across multiple domains.

Main Conclusions:

The study demonstrates that DeCRED, a simple yet effective regularization technique, can significantly improve the performance of encoder-decoder ASR models, particularly in challenging out-of-domain scenarios. The proposed method offers a promising avenue for building robust and adaptable ASR systems.

Significance:

This research contributes to the field of ASR by introducing a novel and effective regularization technique that enhances the generalization capabilities of encoder-decoder models. The findings have practical implications for developing ASR systems that can perform reliably in real-world scenarios with diverse acoustic conditions and speaking styles.

Limitations and Future Research:

The study primarily focuses on English language ASR and utilizes a limited computational budget, restricting the training data size and model scale. Future research could explore DeCRED's effectiveness in multilingual settings, larger datasets, and different encoder-decoder architectures. Additionally, investigating the impact of combining DeCRED with other regularization techniques could further enhance ASR performance.

edit_icon

Tilpas resumé

edit_icon

Genskriv med AI

edit_icon

Generer citater

translate_icon

Oversæt kilde

visual_icon

Generer mindmap

visit_icon

Besøg kilde

Statistik
DeCRED reduced WER by 2.7% on the AMI dataset and 2.9% on the Gigaspeech dataset compared to the baseline model. DeCRED-base model (172M parameters) outperforms OWSM v3 (889M parameters) on in-domain and out-of-domain datasets. DeCRED-small model with greedy decoding performs similarly to ED-base model while being significantly smaller and faster. Text normalization using the Whisper scheme improved WER by 0.8% on VoxPopuli and 0.5% on TEDLIUM3.
Citater
"Our choice of regularisation is architecture-driven, i.e., we choose to regularise the decoder module of the encoder-decoder architecture by introducing auxiliary classifier(s) in the intermediate layers." "In this paper, we ask the question what additional, yet, simple method can further improve the robustness of ASR systems?" "We hypothesise that regularising the ASR model during training prevents overfitting and helps generalise better in out-of-domain scenarios."

Dybere Forespørgsler

How does the performance of DeCRED compare to other regularization techniques like dropout or weight decay when applied to the decoder module of ASR models?

While the paper doesn't directly compare DeCRED with dropout or weight decay specifically on the decoder, we can infer some insights and draw parallels from related work. DeCRED vs. Dropout: Dropout, a widely used regularization technique, randomly drops units (along with their connections) during training. This prevents units from co-adapting too much and promotes robustness. DeCRED, on the other hand, focuses on regularizing the decoder's internal language model (ILM) by forcing intermediate layers to learn discriminative features. This direct regularization of the ILM is not present in dropout. DeCRED vs. Weight Decay: Weight decay, another common regularization method, adds a penalty term to the loss function, encouraging smaller weights. This helps prevent overfitting by penalizing complex models. DeCRED's regularization effect stems from the auxiliary classifiers guiding the decoder towards better language modeling, which is distinct from weight decay's general weight penalization. Potential Synergies: It's important to note that DeCRED, dropout, and weight decay are not mutually exclusive. They could potentially complement each other. For instance, applying dropout within the DeCRED architecture might further enhance its regularization capabilities. Empirical Comparison Needed: A direct empirical comparison on the same dataset would be necessary to definitively conclude how DeCRED's performance compares to dropout or weight decay when applied solely to the decoder module. The paper primarily focuses on DeCRED's effectiveness in improving generalization and out-of-domain performance, highlighting its unique advantages in those aspects.

Could the improved performance of DeCRED be attributed to simply increasing the model's capacity rather than the specific regularization effect of the auxiliary classifiers?

While adding auxiliary classifiers does increase the model's parameter count, the paper provides evidence suggesting that the performance gains are primarily due to the regularization effect of DeCRED, not just increased capacity: Minimal Parameter Increase: The paper emphasizes that the auxiliary classifiers add a "negligible computational cost during training" and "no additional cost during decoding." This implies that the parameter increase is relatively small compared to the overall model size. Ablation Study: The ablation study in Section 7 investigates the impact of different DeCRED configurations, including the position and weight of auxiliary classifiers. The results show that strategic placement and weighting of these classifiers lead to significant performance improvements, indicating that their effect goes beyond simply adding parameters. ILM Perplexity Analysis: Section 6 analyzes the internal language model (ILM) perplexity of DeCRED and the baseline model. The consistent reduction in perplexity across datasets for DeCRED suggests that the auxiliary classifiers are effectively regularizing the ILM, leading to better language modeling and generalization. Out-of-Domain Performance: DeCRED demonstrates superior performance on out-of-domain datasets compared to the baseline, even when both models are trained on the same data. This generalization ability further supports the claim that DeCRED's effectiveness stems from its regularization effect, not just increased capacity.

How can the insights from DeCRED be applied to other natural language processing tasks that utilize encoder-decoder architectures, such as machine translation or text summarization?

The core idea of DeCRED, regularizing the decoder's internal language model through auxiliary classifiers, holds promising potential for application in other encoder-decoder-based NLP tasks: Machine Translation: Improved Fluency and Coherence: Integrating DeCRED into Neural Machine Translation (NMT) systems could enhance the fluency and coherence of the generated translations. By regularizing the decoder, DeCRED can guide the model towards producing more grammatically correct and contextually appropriate translations. Domain Adaptation: Similar to its application in ASR, DeCRED could facilitate rapid domain adaptation in NMT. By fine-tuning the auxiliary classifier weights on a small in-domain dataset, the model could quickly adapt to the specific linguistic nuances of that domain. Text Summarization: Enhanced Coherence and Factual Consistency: Applying DeCRED to text summarization models could lead to summaries that are more coherent and factually consistent with the source text. The auxiliary classifiers can help the decoder learn to generate summaries that adhere to grammatical rules and maintain semantic coherence. Controllability and Style Transfer: DeCRED's auxiliary classifiers could potentially be used to control the style and content of the generated summaries. By training separate classifiers on different writing styles or content domains, the model could be guided to produce summaries tailored to specific requirements. General Considerations: Task-Specific Adaptations: While the core principles of DeCRED are transferable, task-specific adaptations might be necessary. For instance, the placement and weighting of auxiliary classifiers might need to be adjusted based on the specific characteristics of the target NLP task. Computational Cost: The computational overhead introduced by DeCRED should be carefully considered, especially for resource-intensive tasks like machine translation. However, the paper suggests that the additional cost is relatively small, and the potential performance gains might outweigh the computational overhead.
0
star