The study comprehensively evaluated the zero-shot generalization capability of the Segment Anything Model (SAM) in brain tumor segmentation tasks. The key findings are:
SAM with box prompts performs better than that with point prompts. Box prompts can effectively confine the segmentation results within the box, reducing false positive areas and improving SAM's segmentation performance.
Increasing the number of point prompts can enhance SAM's segmentation performance up to a certain point. However, too many point prompts can lead to a decline in performance as many prompts become ineffective and increase false positive areas.
Combining box and point prompts further improves SAM's segmentation performance compared to using only box or point prompts.
SAM's segmentation performance varies across different imaging modalities, with T1 modality data exhibiting the lowest performance. This is likely due to the blurred boundaries in T1 images compared to other modalities.
SAM performs better in segmenting the tumor core and enhancing tumor regions compared to the whole tumor, as the boundaries of the tumor core and enhancing tumor are generally clearer.
Adding randomness to the prompts, such as randomly scaling boxes or moving points, decreases SAM's segmentation performance, reflecting its sensitivity to prompt quality in practical interactive segmentation scenarios.
Fine-tuning SAM with a substantial amount of brain tumor datasets significantly enhances its segmentation performance, highlighting its potential in downstream tasks.
Til et andet sprog
fra kildeindhold
arxiv.org
Vigtigste indsigter udtrukket fra
by Peng Zhang, ... kl. arxiv.org 09-12-2024
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2309.08434.pdfDybere Forespørgsler