MORCELA: A New Linking Theory for Evaluating Language Model Acceptability Judgments

Kernekoncepter

Language models' (LMs) probability scores can be better correlated with human acceptability judgments by using a new linking theory called MORCELA, which accounts for model-specific variations in sensitivity to sentence length and word frequency.

Resumé

This research paper introduces MORCELA (Magnitude-Optimized Regression for Controlling Effects on Linguistic Acceptability), a novel linking theory designed to enhance the correlation between language model (LM) probability scores and human judgments of sentence acceptability.

The authors argue that existing linking theories, such as the widely used SLOR (Syntactic Log-Odds Ratio), rely on fixed assumptions about the impact of sentence length and word frequency on LM probabilities, which may not hold true across different models, particularly larger, more performant ones.

MORCELA addresses this limitation by incorporating learnable parameters that adjust for these factors on a per-model basis. The researchers demonstrate MORCELA's effectiveness by evaluating its performance on two families of transformer LMs: Pythia and OPT. Their findings reveal that MORCELA consistently outperforms SLOR in predicting human acceptability judgments, with larger models exhibiting a more pronounced improvement.

Furthermore, the study's analysis of the learned parameters suggests that SLOR tends to overcorrect for length and frequency effects, especially in larger models. This overcorrection highlights the importance of model-specific adjustments when comparing LM probabilities to human judgments.

The authors also explore the relationship between a model's ability to predict infrequent words in context and its sensitivity to unigram frequency. They find that larger models, which generally exhibit a better understanding of context, are less affected by word frequency, suggesting a link between contextual understanding and robustness to frequency effects.

The paper concludes by emphasizing the need to consider model-specific characteristics when evaluating LM acceptability judgments and suggests that incorporating such considerations can lead to a more accurate assessment of LMs' alignment with human linguistic judgments.

Statistik

MORCELA shows up to a +∆0.17 gain in correlation with human judgments over SLOR.
This amounts to a 46% relative error reduction from SLOR with respect to the inter-group correlation upper bound (r = 0.860).
All values of the length-normalized intercept γ in MORCELA are positive.
All values of the unigram coefficient β in MORCELA are less than 1.

Citater

"when comparing probability-based LM acceptability judgments to those of humans, controls for factors like length and unigram frequency should be made on a per-model basis."
"larger models’ lower reliance on unigram frequency is driven by their improved ability to predict rare words given appropriate context."

Vigtigste indsigter udtrukket fra

What Goes Into a LM Acceptability Judgment? Rethinking the Impact of Frequency and Length

by Lindia Tjuat... kl. arxiv.org 11-06-2024

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2411.02528.pdf

Dybere Forespørgsler

How might MORCELA be adapted for evaluating acceptability judgments in languages with different typological features than English?

Adapting MORCELA for languages with different typological features than English requires careful consideration of the specific linguistic properties of those languages. Here's a breakdown of potential adaptations:
1. Redefining "Length":

Morphological Complexity: In agglutinative languages like Turkish or Finnish, a single word can carry the information of multiple English words. Simply counting tokens might not accurately reflect sentence complexity. Instead, consider:

Morpheme Count: Count morphemes (meaningful units within words) instead of tokens.
Character Count: Use character count as a proxy for length, especially for languages with limited morphology.

Word Order Flexibility: Languages with flexible word order might have different sensitivities to sentence length. Investigate whether:

Dependency Length: Average dependency distance (number of words between syntactically related words) is a more appropriate measure.
2. Refining "Unigram Frequency":

Morphological Variations: Highly inflected languages have numerous forms of a single word.

Lemma Frequency: Use the frequency of the base form (lemma) of a word instead of individual inflected forms.
Subword Frequency: Incorporate subword unit frequencies (like byte-pair encodings) to capture regularities in morphology.

Data Sparsity: Low-resource languages might have limited training data, impacting frequency estimates.

Cross-lingual Embeddings: Leverage pre-trained cross-lingual word embeddings to obtain frequency information from related, higher-resource languages.
Smoothing Techniques: Apply smoothing techniques (e.g., add-k smoothing) to handle infrequent words more robustly.
3. Beyond Length and Frequency:

Typological Features: Incorporate language-specific features as additional parameters in MORCELA:

Head-Finality: A binary feature indicating whether the language is head-final (verb comes last in a phrase).
Pro-Drop: A binary feature indicating whether the language allows omitting pronouns.

Syntactic Complexity: Explore measures beyond unigram frequency:

Bigram/Trigram Frequencies: Capture more contextual information about word sequences.
Part-of-Speech Tag Frequencies: Account for the distribution of syntactic categories.
4. Retraining and Evaluation:

Language-Specific Data: Crucially, retrain MORCELA's parameters on acceptability judgment data from the target language.
Cross-Lingual Evaluation: Assess the generalizability of the adapted MORCELA by evaluating it on multiple typologically diverse languages.

Could the overcorrection for length and frequency effects observed in SLOR be mitigated through alternative normalization techniques or training procedures?

Yes, the overcorrection for length and frequency effects observed in SLOR could potentially be mitigated through alternative normalization techniques or training procedures:
Alternative Normalization Techniques:

Non-Linear Normalization: Instead of the linear adjustments in SLOR, explore non-linear functions (e.g., logarithmic, sigmoidal) to capture potentially non-linear relationships between length/frequency and acceptability.
Context-Aware Normalization: Instead of using global unigram frequencies, calculate token frequencies within specific contexts (e.g., part-of-speech tags, syntactic dependencies) to account for variations in word rarity across linguistic environments.
Quantile Normalization: Normalize length and frequency values based on their quantiles within the dataset, making the normalization less sensitive to outliers.
Training Procedures:

Curriculum Learning: Train language models with a curriculum that gradually introduces longer and more complex sentences, potentially reducing the model's bias towards shorter, more frequent constructions.
Data Augmentation: Augment the training data with synthetically generated sentences that control for length and frequency, exposing the model to a more balanced distribution of linguistic phenomena.
Regularization Techniques: Incorporate regularization terms during training that penalize the model for relying too heavily on length or frequency as predictors of acceptability.
Beyond SLOR:

Probabilistic Models: Explore probabilistic models that explicitly model the relationship between acceptability, length, and frequency, allowing for more nuanced and flexible adjustments.
Neural Network Architectures: Design neural network architectures with specific components that learn to represent and normalize for length and frequency effects, potentially leading to more accurate acceptability predictions.
Evaluation and Comparison:

Systematic Evaluation: Rigorously evaluate the effectiveness of these alternative techniques by comparing their performance to SLOR and MORCELA on diverse datasets and languages.
Human Evaluation: Ultimately, human evaluation of the generated acceptability judgments is crucial to assess the naturalness and cognitive plausibility of the models.

What are the implications of these findings for the development of more cognitively plausible language models that better approximate human language processing?

The findings regarding MORCELA and the overcorrection of length and frequency effects in SLOR have significant implications for developing more cognitively plausible language models:
1. Moving Beyond Surface Statistics:

Contextual Sensitivity: The success of MORCELA, particularly its ability to adjust for unigram frequency on a per-model basis, highlights the importance of context in human language processing. Future models should focus on capturing deeper semantic and syntactic relationships rather than relying solely on surface-level statistics like word frequencies.
Subtle Linguistic Phenomena: The fact that larger models are better at predicting rarer words in context suggests that they are learning more nuanced linguistic phenomena. This encourages the development of models that can handle complex grammatical constructions, idiomatic expressions, and other subtleties of human language.
2. Rethinking Evaluation Metrics:

Beyond Simple Correlations: While correlation with human judgments is a valuable metric, it might not fully capture the cognitive processes involved in language understanding. Future work should explore more sophisticated evaluation methods that assess a model's ability to reason about language, make inferences, and handle ambiguity.
Task-Specific Evaluation: Cognitive plausibility might manifest differently across various language tasks. It's essential to evaluate models on a range of tasks that reflect the diversity of human language use, such as question answering, summarization, and dialogue generation.
3. Incorporating Cognitive Constraints:

Attention Mechanisms: The finding that larger models are less reliant on unigram frequency aligns with the idea that they are better at utilizing contextual information. This suggests that attention mechanisms, which allow models to focus on relevant parts of the input, could be a promising avenue for building more cognitively plausible models.
Memory and Reasoning: Humans use memory and reasoning to process language, going beyond simply predicting the next word. Incorporating mechanisms for memory retrieval, inference, and logical reasoning into language models could enhance their cognitive plausibility.
4. Bridging the Gap Between Humans and Machines:

Explainable AI: Understanding how and why models make certain predictions is crucial for building trust and ensuring responsible AI development. Developing methods to interpret and explain the decision-making processes of language models will be essential for creating more transparent and understandable systems.
Human-in-the-Loop Learning: Incorporating human feedback and knowledge into the training process can help guide models towards more human-like behavior. This could involve techniques like active learning, where models actively query humans for information, or reinforcement learning, where models learn from human rewards.