Multi-Objective Learning Model Predictive Control for Iterative Performance Improvement of Linear Systems

Conceptos Básicos

This paper presents a novel data-driven control scheme called Multi-Objective Learning Model Predictive Control (MO-LMPC) that leverages iterative task executions to enhance the closed-loop performance of linear systems with respect to multiple, potentially competing, control objectives.

Resumen

• Bibliographic Information: Nair, S. H., Vallon, C., & Borrelli, F. (2024). Multi-Objective Learning Model Predictive Control. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.11698v2.
• Research Objective: This paper introduces a novel control scheme, MO-LMPC, designed to iteratively improve the performance of linear systems across multiple control objectives during repeated executions of a task.
• Methodology: The authors extend the existing Learning Model Predictive Control (LMPC) framework to handle multiple objectives. They achieve this by incorporating a scalarization approach from multi-objective optimization theory into the LMPC formulation. This involves minimizing a weighted sum of the different control objectives, ensuring no single objective's performance degrades between iterations.
• Key Findings: The paper provides theoretical proofs for the proposed MO-LMPC scheme, demonstrating its recursive feasibility, guaranteed performance improvement for each individual objective over successive iterations, and the Pareto optimality of the converged policy.
• Main Conclusions: The MO-LMPC offers a practical and theoretically sound approach for data-driven control design in scenarios involving multiple, potentially competing, objectives. The scheme's ability to learn from past iterations and guarantee non-degradation of individual objectives makes it particularly suitable for applications like autonomous vehicle control and multi-agent systems.
• Significance: This research significantly contributes to the field of data-driven control by extending the capabilities of LMPC to multi-objective scenarios. The proposed MO-LMPC scheme holds substantial promise for applications demanding the optimization of multiple, potentially conflicting, criteria, such as minimizing both time and energy consumption in autonomous systems.
• Limitations and Future Research: The paper primarily focuses on linear systems. Future research could explore extending the MO-LMPC framework to handle nonlinear system dynamics. Additionally, investigating different scalarization techniques within the MO-LMPC framework and their impact on the convergence properties and the achieved Pareto optimal solutions could be a fruitful research direction.

Estadísticas

Citas

Ideas clave extraídas de

Multi-Objective Learning Model Predictive Control

by Siddharth H.... a las arxiv.org 10-21-2024

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2405.11698.pdf

Consultas más profundas

How can the MO-LMPC framework be adapted to handle uncertain or dynamic environments where the task parameters might change between iterations?

Adapting the MO-LMPC framework to handle uncertain or dynamic environments where task parameters can change between iterations presents several challenges and requires modifications to enhance its robustness and adaptability. Here's a breakdown of potential strategies:
1. Robust Formulation:

Robust Safe Set: Instead of relying solely on the convex hull of previous trajectories, incorporate robustness margins into the safe set construction. This could involve expanding the set based on uncertainty bounds or using techniques like reachable set analysis to account for potential disturbances.
Constraint Tightening: Introduce tightened constraints in the MO-LMPC optimization problem (18) to account for uncertainties in the system dynamics (1) or stage costs (4). This ensures that the planned trajectories remain feasible even under perturbations.
Stochastic Optimization: If the uncertainties can be modeled probabilistically, reformulate the MO-LMPC problem (18) as a stochastic optimization problem. This involves optimizing expected values of the objectives or incorporating chance constraints to handle probabilistic constraints.
2. Adaptive Learning:

Online Parameter Estimation: Integrate online system identification or parameter adaptation techniques to update the system model (1) based on observed data. This allows the MO-LMPC to adapt to changes in the system dynamics.
Dynamic Weighting of Objectives: Allow the scalarization parameters (α in equation 14) to vary between iterations or even within an iteration. This enables the MO-LMPC to adjust its prioritization of objectives based on the changing environment or task requirements.
Experience Replay: Store data from previous iterations and selectively replay or re-weight this data during the optimization process. This can help the MO-LMPC to generalize better to changing conditions and avoid overfitting to specific instances of the task.
3. Predictive Adaptation:

Receding Horizon Planning: The inherent receding horizon nature of MPC provides some level of adaptation. By continuously re-planning based on the current state and updated information, the MO-LMPC can react to changes in the environment.
Scenario-Based MPC: Incorporate multiple plausible future scenarios of the uncertain environment into the optimization problem. This allows the MO-LMPC to generate control policies that are robust to a range of possible future outcomes.
Challenges:

Computational Complexity: Robust and adaptive techniques often increase the computational burden of the MO-LMPC, potentially making real-time implementation challenging.
Data Efficiency: Learning in uncertain and dynamic environments typically requires more data, which might necessitate longer learning phases or careful exploration strategies.

Could a hierarchical control architecture, where a high-level planner sets intermediate targets for the MO-LMPC based on global objectives, be more efficient than directly optimizing all objectives at the low level?

Yes, a hierarchical control architecture can indeed be more efficient than directly optimizing all objectives at the low level in the MO-LMPC framework, especially when dealing with complex tasks and multiple objectives. Here's why:
Advantages of Hierarchical Control:

Reduced Complexity: Decomposing the overall control problem into a hierarchy simplifies the optimization process. The high-level planner focuses on strategic decision-making and long-term goals, while the low-level MO-LMPC handles local trajectory optimization and constraint satisfaction.
Computational Efficiency: By dividing the problem, the computational burden is distributed. The high-level planner typically operates at a lower frequency, reducing the overall computational demand.
Improved Scalability: Hierarchical architectures are more scalable to systems with a large number of states, inputs, or objectives.
Abstraction and Reusability: The hierarchical structure allows for modularity and reusability of controllers. The high-level planner can be designed to be task-agnostic, while the low-level MO-LMPC can be tailored to specific subsystems or tasks.
Implementation Considerations:

Interface Design: Defining a clear and consistent interface between the high-level planner and the low-level MO-LMPC is crucial. This includes specifying the information exchanged, such as intermediate targets, constraints, and performance metrics.
Coordination and Consistency: Ensuring coordination and consistency between the different levels of the hierarchy is essential. The high-level plans should be feasible and achievable by the low-level controllers.
Target Selection: The high-level planner needs to employ efficient algorithms for selecting appropriate intermediate targets that guide the low-level MO-LMPC towards the global objectives.
Example:
In the autonomous delivery vehicle example, a high-level planner could determine the optimal sequence of delivery locations and assign time windows for each delivery based on factors like distance, traffic conditions, and customer preferences. The MO-LMPC for each vehicle would then focus on generating energy- and time-efficient trajectories between these assigned waypoints while ensuring on-time arrival.

What are the implications of this research for the development of increasingly autonomous systems that need to balance a complex array of objectives in real-time?

This research on MO-LMPC has significant implications for the development of increasingly autonomous systems that must balance a complex array of objectives in real-time:
1. Practical Multi-Objective Control: MO-LMPC offers a practical framework for designing controllers that can handle multiple, potentially competing, objectives in real-time. This is crucial for autonomous systems that need to operate in complex and dynamic environments where trade-offs between performance metrics are often necessary.
2. Data-Driven Optimization: The data-driven nature of MO-LMPC allows autonomous systems to learn and improve their performance over time, even with limited prior knowledge of the system dynamics or the environment. This is particularly relevant for systems operating in uncertain or unpredictable conditions.
3. Safety and Performance Guarantees: The theoretical guarantees of stability, feasibility, and iterative performance improvement provided by MO-LMPC are essential for ensuring the safe and reliable operation of autonomous systems. These guarantees provide confidence in the controller's ability to meet performance objectives without violating critical constraints.
4. Scalability and Complexity Management: The potential for hierarchical architectures within the MO-LMPC framework addresses the challenges of scalability and complexity often encountered in autonomous systems. This enables the development of controllers for systems with a large number of states, inputs, or objectives.
5. Enabling More Sophisticated Autonomy: By providing a principled approach to multi-objective control, MO-LMPC paves the way for the development of more sophisticated and capable autonomous systems. These systems can make more informed decisions, adapt to changing conditions, and operate more efficiently and effectively in real-world scenarios.
Applications:
The implications of this research extend to a wide range of applications, including:

Autonomous Driving: Balancing safety, efficiency, comfort, and adherence to traffic rules.
Robotics: Optimizing robot motion for tasks involving manipulation, navigation, and interaction with humans.
Energy Systems: Managing energy generation, storage, and consumption in smart grids and microgrids.
Aerospace Applications: Controlling aircraft and spacecraft for optimal trajectory planning, fuel efficiency, and mission success.
Overall, this research on MO-LMPC represents a significant step towards enabling the development of more intelligent, adaptable, and reliable autonomous systems that can operate safely and efficiently in complex and dynamic environments.