This systematic review synthesizes empirical research on student-generated graphs based on numerical data in K-12 STEM education, examining the implementation, effectiveness, and challenges of graphing. The review analyzes 50 peer-reviewed studies published between 1979 and 2024, revealing a recent increase in research on this topic.
The studies employed diverse methodologies, with most focusing on problem-solving scenarios and utilizing a range of graph types, including line graphs, bar graphs, and tables. While manual graphing was prevalent, tool-based graphing using software like TinkerPlots and Excel was also explored. The level of guidance provided to students during graph construction varied, with some studies offering explicit instructions while others provided minimal support.
Although many studies did not explicitly state hypotheses or report effect sizes, those that did generally indicated a positive impact of graphing on student learning. Graphing instruction was found to enhance both graph construction and interpretation skills.
Despite its benefits, the review highlights various difficulties students face when graphing. These challenges include:
The review underscores the importance of explicit graphing instruction in K-12 STEM education. Educators should be aware of the potential difficulties students may encounter and provide appropriate support and scaffolding. Further research is needed to explore the effectiveness of different graphing methods and interventions, particularly in the context of emerging technologies and diverse learning environments.
A otro idioma
del contenido fuente
arxiv.org
Ideas clave extraídas de
by Verena Ruf, ... a las arxiv.org 11-21-2024
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2411.13195.pdfConsultas más profundas