näkemys - Autonomous Driving - # Multi-Modal Imitation Learning for End-to-End Autonomous Driving

Enhancing End-to-End Autonomous Driving through Multi-Modal Prompting and Language Model Integration

Q: How can the proposed framework be extended to handle more complex driving scenarios, such as intersections with traffic lights and pedestrians?

The proposed framework can be extended to handle more complex driving scenarios by incorporating additional modules and strategies. One approach could be to integrate advanced perception models that specifically focus on detecting and understanding traffic lights, pedestrian movements, and other critical elements in the environment. By enhancing the perception capabilities, the system can better interpret and respond to complex scenarios at intersections. Furthermore, the prompt construction strategy can be refined to include specific language cues related to traffic lights, pedestrian crossings, and other relevant factors. This would enable the language model to generate driving actions based on a comprehensive understanding of the environment, including the presence of traffic signals and pedestrians. Additionally, the reinforcement-guided tuning mechanism can be further optimized to provide feedback and corrections specifically tailored to complex scenarios. By training the system on a diverse set of challenging driving situations, it can learn to navigate intersections with varying traffic conditions and pedestrian interactions effectively.

Q: What are the potential drawbacks or limitations of relying on LLMs for autonomous driving, and how can they be addressed?

While LLMs offer significant potential for enhancing autonomous driving systems, there are several drawbacks and limitations that need to be addressed: Inference Speed: LLMs can be computationally intensive, leading to slow inference speeds which may not be suitable for real-time driving applications. This can be addressed by optimizing the model architecture, leveraging hardware acceleration, or implementing efficient algorithms for faster processing. Unpredictability: LLMs may generate unpredictable or unsafe driving actions, especially in novel or ambiguous situations. To mitigate this, robust safety mechanisms, such as the re-query mechanism proposed in the framework, can be implemented to ensure that generated actions align with safety guidelines. Limited Understanding of Physical Environment: LLMs may lack a deep understanding of the physical environment, leading to challenges in interpreting complex driving scenarios. This can be improved by enhancing the multi-modal fusion techniques to provide more comprehensive sensory input to the language model. Training Data Bias: LLMs are susceptible to biases present in the training data, which can result in undesirable behavior. Addressing this limitation requires careful curation of training datasets and the implementation of bias mitigation strategies during model training.

Q: How can the multi-modal fusion and prompt construction strategies be further improved to enhance the overall driving performance and safety?

To enhance the multi-modal fusion and prompt construction strategies for improved driving performance and safety, the following approaches can be considered: Enhanced Sensor Integration: Incorporate additional sensors, such as radar or ultrasonic sensors, to provide a more comprehensive view of the environment. This can improve the accuracy of perception and enable better decision-making by the driving model. Dynamic Prompt Generation: Develop dynamic prompt generation algorithms that adapt to real-time driving conditions. By incorporating dynamic prompts based on the current environment and driving context, the language model can generate more contextually relevant driving actions. Safety-Centric Prompt Design: Design prompts that prioritize safety-critical information, such as obstacle detection, lane markings, and speed limits. By focusing on safety-critical aspects in the prompts, the driving model can make more informed and safe decisions. Continuous Learning Mechanisms: Implement continuous learning mechanisms that allow the system to adapt and improve over time based on real-world driving experiences. By continuously updating the model with new data and feedback, the driving performance and safety can be enhanced iteratively.

Keskeiset käsitteet

Combining basic driving imitation learning with Large Language Models (LLMs) based on multi-modality prompt tokens to enhance end-to-end autonomous driving performance.

Tiivistelmä

The paper proposes a novel framework that incorporates multi-modality perception inputs, including visual and LiDAR data, into joint token representations. These tokens are then used to prompt LLMs to generate driving descriptions and actions, rather than directly letting the LLMs drive.

The key highlights are:

A two-stage fusion network that encodes visual and LiDAR inputs into joint multi-modal tokens.
A prompt construction strategy that combines the multi-modal tokens, vehicle status, and driving task information to guide the LLM.
A re-query mechanism that allows the system to re-evaluate the LLM's output if it conflicts with safety constraints.
Incorporation of reward-guided reinforcement learning to further improve the model's waypoint prediction and control signal generation.

The experiments conducted on the CARLA simulator show that the proposed approach can achieve driving scores comparable to state-of-the-art end-to-end driving models, while also demonstrating the potential of leveraging LLMs to enhance autonomous driving capabilities.

Mukauta tiivistelmää

Kirjoita tekoälyn avulla

Luo viitteet

Käännä lähde

toiselle kielelle

Luo miellekartta

lähdeaineistosta

Siirry lähteeseen

arxiv.org

Tilastot

The car is driving , weather condition , there are currently <2> cars ahead, #obj1 is at <23 degrees>, distance <8m>, and #obj2 is at <30 degrees> and the distance is <8.5m>. Barrier ahead <N/A> Current driving speed, throttle <20%>, traffic light conditions <N/A> pedestrians <0>
The car is driving , weather condition , there are currently <4> cars ahead, #obj1 is at <-5 degrees>, distance <10m>, #obj2 is at <18 degrees> and the distance is <15.3m>, #obj3 is at <20 degrees> and the distance is <15.8m>, #obj4 is at <35 degrees> and the distance is <28.5m>. Barrier ahead <8m> Current driving speed, throttle <0%>, traffic light conditions  pedestrians <0>

Lainaukset

According to perception analysis, heading to waypoint in next four time steps <23.56, 78.24>, <28.36, 90.60>…, control action, steer <-15 degrees>,  throttle < 15%> brake < 0%>
According to perception analysis, heading to waypoint in next four time steps <8.68, 12.34>, <12.51, 18.37>, <18.23, 25.17>,<22.05, 29.17>, control action, steer <-0.8 degrees>, throttle < 23%> brake < 0%>

Tärkeimmät oivallukset

Prompting Multi-Modal Tokens to Enhance End-to-End Autonomous Driving Imitation Learning with LLMs

by Yiqun Duan,Q... klo arxiv.org 04-09-2024

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2404.04869.pdf

Prompting Multi-Modal Tokens to Enhance End-to-End Autonomous Driving Imitation Learning with LLMs

Syvällisempiä Kysymyksiä

How can the proposed framework be extended to handle more complex driving scenarios, such as intersections with traffic lights and pedestrians?

The proposed framework can be extended to handle more complex driving scenarios by incorporating additional modules and strategies. One approach could be to integrate advanced perception models that specifically focus on detecting and understanding traffic lights, pedestrian movements, and other critical elements in the environment. By enhancing the perception capabilities, the system can better interpret and respond to complex scenarios at intersections.
Furthermore, the prompt construction strategy can be refined to include specific language cues related to traffic lights, pedestrian crossings, and other relevant factors. This would enable the language model to generate driving actions based on a comprehensive understanding of the environment, including the presence of traffic signals and pedestrians.
Additionally, the reinforcement-guided tuning mechanism can be further optimized to provide feedback and corrections specifically tailored to complex scenarios. By training the system on a diverse set of challenging driving situations, it can learn to navigate intersections with varying traffic conditions and pedestrian interactions effectively.

What are the potential drawbacks or limitations of relying on LLMs for autonomous driving, and how can they be addressed?

While LLMs offer significant potential for enhancing autonomous driving systems, there are several drawbacks and limitations that need to be addressed:

Inference Speed: LLMs can be computationally intensive, leading to slow inference speeds which may not be suitable for real-time driving applications. This can be addressed by optimizing the model architecture, leveraging hardware acceleration, or implementing efficient algorithms for faster processing.

Unpredictability: LLMs may generate unpredictable or unsafe driving actions, especially in novel or ambiguous situations. To mitigate this, robust safety mechanisms, such as the re-query mechanism proposed in the framework, can be implemented to ensure that generated actions align with safety guidelines.

Limited Understanding of Physical Environment: LLMs may lack a deep understanding of the physical environment, leading to challenges in interpreting complex driving scenarios. This can be improved by enhancing the multi-modal fusion techniques to provide more comprehensive sensory input to the language model.

Training Data Bias: LLMs are susceptible to biases present in the training data, which can result in undesirable behavior. Addressing this limitation requires careful curation of training datasets and the implementation of bias mitigation strategies during model training.

How can the multi-modal fusion and prompt construction strategies be further improved to enhance the overall driving performance and safety?

To enhance the multi-modal fusion and prompt construction strategies for improved driving performance and safety, the following approaches can be considered:

Enhanced Sensor Integration: Incorporate additional sensors, such as radar or ultrasonic sensors, to provide a more comprehensive view of the environment. This can improve the accuracy of perception and enable better decision-making by the driving model.

Dynamic Prompt Generation: Develop dynamic prompt generation algorithms that adapt to real-time driving conditions. By incorporating dynamic prompts based on the current environment and driving context, the language model can generate more contextually relevant driving actions.

Safety-Centric Prompt Design: Design prompts that prioritize safety-critical information, such as obstacle detection, lane markings, and speed limits. By focusing on safety-critical aspects in the prompts, the driving model can make more informed and safe decisions.

Continuous Learning Mechanisms: Implement continuous learning mechanisms that allow the system to adapt and improve over time based on real-world driving experiences. By continuously updating the model with new data and feedback, the driving performance and safety can be enhanced iteratively.