näkemys - Computer Vision - # Explainable Hate Speech Detection

Leveraging Graph Neural Networks for Explainable Identification of Hate Speech towards Islam

Q: How can the proposed XG-HSI framework be extended to detect and explain hate speech targeting other marginalized communities?

The proposed XG-HSI framework, which utilizes Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) for the detection and explanation of hate speech towards Islam, can be effectively extended to target other marginalized communities by following a systematic approach. First, the framework can be adapted to focus on specific datasets that contain hate speech directed at various groups, such as racial minorities, LGBTQ+ individuals, or religious sects. This involves curating or creating datasets similar to the HateXplain dataset, ensuring that they are rich in context and labeled accurately for the targeted community. Next, the preprocessing steps in the XG-HSI framework can be modified to include community-specific linguistic features and cultural nuances. This may involve employing domain-specific pretrained NLP models that are fine-tuned on texts relevant to the targeted community, thereby enhancing the contextual understanding of hate speech. Furthermore, the graph construction process can be tailored to reflect the unique relationships and interactions within the new community. By establishing edges based on contextual similarities and community-specific language patterns, the GNN can better capture the dynamics of hate speech propagation within that community. Finally, the explainability aspect of the framework can be enhanced by incorporating community feedback and expert insights during the model training and evaluation phases. This participatory approach ensures that the explanations generated by the GNN are not only technically sound but also resonate with the lived experiences of the targeted community, thereby improving the model's interpretability and acceptance.

Q: What are the potential limitations and biases in the dataset and model that could impact the fairness and robustness of the hate speech detection system?

The potential limitations and biases in the dataset and model used in the XG-HSI framework can significantly impact the fairness and robustness of the hate speech detection system. One major limitation is the reliance on a single dataset, such as HateXplain, which may not encompass the full spectrum of hate speech directed at Islam or other marginalized communities. This can lead to a lack of generalizability, as the model may perform well on the training data but struggle with unseen data that contains different linguistic styles or contexts. Additionally, biases in the dataset can arise from the labeling process. If the annotators have inherent biases or if the dataset is not representative of the diverse expressions of hate speech, the model may learn to misclassify certain expressions or fail to recognize subtle forms of hate speech. This can result in false positives or negatives, disproportionately affecting specific groups. Moreover, the GNN model itself may introduce biases based on the features selected for node representation and the relationships defined in the graph. If certain words or phrases are overrepresented or underrepresented in the training data, the model may develop skewed interpretations of what constitutes hate speech. To mitigate these issues, it is crucial to employ diverse datasets, ensure rigorous annotation processes, and continuously evaluate the model's performance across various demographic groups. Implementing fairness-aware algorithms and conducting bias audits can also help in identifying and addressing potential biases in the hate speech detection system.

Q: How can the integration of multimodal data sources, such as images and videos, enhance the capabilities of GNN-based hate speech detection models?

Integrating multimodal data sources, such as images and videos, can significantly enhance the capabilities of GNN-based hate speech detection models by providing a richer context for understanding hate speech. Text alone may not capture the full extent of hateful rhetoric, especially when visual elements play a crucial role in conveying messages. For instance, an image accompanying a text post may contain symbols, gestures, or visual cues that amplify the hateful sentiment expressed in the text. By incorporating images and videos, the GNN can analyze the relationships between textual and visual data, allowing for a more comprehensive understanding of the context in which hate speech occurs. This multimodal approach can help the model identify patterns that may not be evident when analyzing text alone, such as the use of specific imagery that is commonly associated with hate speech. Furthermore, the integration of multimodal data can improve the model's robustness against attempts to circumvent text-based detection methods. For example, users may employ euphemisms or coded language in text while using provocative images or videos to convey hate. A GNN that processes both text and visual data can better detect these nuanced forms of hate speech. To implement this integration effectively, the framework would need to include preprocessing steps for visual data, such as feature extraction using convolutional neural networks (CNNs) or other image processing techniques. The resulting features can then be incorporated into the graph structure, allowing the GNN to leverage both textual and visual information in its predictions and explanations. This holistic approach not only enhances detection accuracy but also enriches the interpretability of the model's outputs, providing deeper insights into the mechanisms of hate speech propagation across different media.

Keskeiset käsitteet

A novel approach using Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) can effectively identify and explain hate speech directed at Islam, achieving state-of-the-art performance and providing valuable insights into the underlying patterns and context of such content.

Tiivistelmä

This study introduces a novel approach employing Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) for the identification and explication of hate speech directed at Islam (XG-HSI). The key highlights and insights are:

The researchers pre-processed the dataset to focus on Islamic contexts, utilized pretrained NLP models for word embeddings, established connections between texts, and employed a series of graph encoders for hate speech target identification.
The proposed XG-HSI models, XG-HSI-BiRNN and XG-HSI-BERT, significantly outperformed traditional models like CNN-GRU, BiRNN, and BERT-based approaches, achieving the highest accuracy (0.751) and Macro F1 (0.747) scores.
The GNNExplainer was used to provide explanations for the model's predictions, highlighting the influential tokens and their contextual relationships that contributed to the classification of hate speech towards Islam. This explainability aspect offers valuable insights into the underlying patterns and reasoning behind the model's decisions.
The study emphasizes the potential of GNNs in effectively capturing the complex relationships and nuances within textual data, enabling more accurate and interpretable detection of hate speech targeting specific communities, such as the Muslim community in this case.
The findings underscore the importance of addressing Islamophobic hate speech on online platforms, as it can foster intolerance, division, and real-world harm. The proposed XG-HSI framework demonstrates a promising approach to combat such hate speech and promote a safer, more inclusive online environment.

Mukauta tiivistelmää

Kirjoita tekoälyn avulla

Luo viitteet

Käännä lähde

toiselle kielelle

Luo miellekartta

lähdeaineistosta

Siirry lähteeseen

arxiv.org

Tilastot

"How is all that awesome Muslim diversity going for you native germans? You have allowed this yourselves. If you do not stand and fight against this. You get what you asked for what you deserve!"

Lainaukset

"Islamophobic language on online platforms fosters intolerance, making detection and elimination crucial for promoting harmony."
"GNNs excel in capturing complex relationships and patterns within data, enabling them to effectively identify instances of hate speech and elucidate the contextual nuances surrounding them."

Tärkeimmät oivallukset

Explainable Identification of Hate Speech towards Islam using Graph Neural Networks

by Azmine Toush... klo arxiv.org 09-12-2024

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.04916.pdf

Explainable Identification of Hate Speech towards Islam using Graph Neural Networks

Syvällisempiä Kysymyksiä

How can the proposed XG-HSI framework be extended to detect and explain hate speech targeting other marginalized communities?

The proposed XG-HSI framework, which utilizes Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) for the detection and explanation of hate speech towards Islam, can be effectively extended to target other marginalized communities by following a systematic approach. First, the framework can be adapted to focus on specific datasets that contain hate speech directed at various groups, such as racial minorities, LGBTQ+ individuals, or religious sects. This involves curating or creating datasets similar to the HateXplain dataset, ensuring that they are rich in context and labeled accurately for the targeted community.
Next, the preprocessing steps in the XG-HSI framework can be modified to include community-specific linguistic features and cultural nuances. This may involve employing domain-specific pretrained NLP models that are fine-tuned on texts relevant to the targeted community, thereby enhancing the contextual understanding of hate speech.
Furthermore, the graph construction process can be tailored to reflect the unique relationships and interactions within the new community. By establishing edges based on contextual similarities and community-specific language patterns, the GNN can better capture the dynamics of hate speech propagation within that community.
Finally, the explainability aspect of the framework can be enhanced by incorporating community feedback and expert insights during the model training and evaluation phases. This participatory approach ensures that the explanations generated by the GNN are not only technically sound but also resonate with the lived experiences of the targeted community, thereby improving the model's interpretability and acceptance.

What are the potential limitations and biases in the dataset and model that could impact the fairness and robustness of the hate speech detection system?

The potential limitations and biases in the dataset and model used in the XG-HSI framework can significantly impact the fairness and robustness of the hate speech detection system. One major limitation is the reliance on a single dataset, such as HateXplain, which may not encompass the full spectrum of hate speech directed at Islam or other marginalized communities. This can lead to a lack of generalizability, as the model may perform well on the training data but struggle with unseen data that contains different linguistic styles or contexts.
Additionally, biases in the dataset can arise from the labeling process. If the annotators have inherent biases or if the dataset is not representative of the diverse expressions of hate speech, the model may learn to misclassify certain expressions or fail to recognize subtle forms of hate speech. This can result in false positives or negatives, disproportionately affecting specific groups.
Moreover, the GNN model itself may introduce biases based on the features selected for node representation and the relationships defined in the graph. If certain words or phrases are overrepresented or underrepresented in the training data, the model may develop skewed interpretations of what constitutes hate speech.
To mitigate these issues, it is crucial to employ diverse datasets, ensure rigorous annotation processes, and continuously evaluate the model's performance across various demographic groups. Implementing fairness-aware algorithms and conducting bias audits can also help in identifying and addressing potential biases in the hate speech detection system.

How can the integration of multimodal data sources, such as images and videos, enhance the capabilities of GNN-based hate speech detection models?

Integrating multimodal data sources, such as images and videos, can significantly enhance the capabilities of GNN-based hate speech detection models by providing a richer context for understanding hate speech. Text alone may not capture the full extent of hateful rhetoric, especially when visual elements play a crucial role in conveying messages. For instance, an image accompanying a text post may contain symbols, gestures, or visual cues that amplify the hateful sentiment expressed in the text.
By incorporating images and videos, the GNN can analyze the relationships between textual and visual data, allowing for a more comprehensive understanding of the context in which hate speech occurs. This multimodal approach can help the model identify patterns that may not be evident when analyzing text alone, such as the use of specific imagery that is commonly associated with hate speech.
Furthermore, the integration of multimodal data can improve the model's robustness against attempts to circumvent text-based detection methods. For example, users may employ euphemisms or coded language in text while using provocative images or videos to convey hate. A GNN that processes both text and visual data can better detect these nuanced forms of hate speech.
To implement this integration effectively, the framework would need to include preprocessing steps for visual data, such as feature extraction using convolutional neural networks (CNNs) or other image processing techniques. The resulting features can then be incorporated into the graph structure, allowing the GNN to leverage both textual and visual information in its predictions and explanations. This holistic approach not only enhances detection accuracy but also enriches the interpretability of the model's outputs, providing deeper insights into the mechanisms of hate speech propagation across different media.