NoMIRACL introduces a dataset to evaluate LLMs across 18 languages, measuring hallucination and error rates. Results show varying performance among different models, with GPT-4 demonstrating the best tradeoff. The study emphasizes the importance of improving LLM robustness for accurate responses.
The content discusses the challenges in RAG and the reliance on external knowledge sources to enhance LLM output accuracy. It addresses issues of factual hallucinations and outdated knowledge in LLMs. The evaluation setup involves measuring model tendencies to hallucinate answers and inaccuracies in recognizing relevant passages.
Key findings reveal that most LLMs struggle with balancing hallucination and error rates, highlighting the need for further research to enhance robustness. The empirical analysis uncovers patterns of response generation by different models, shedding light on their strengths and limitations.
Overall, NoMIRACL serves as a valuable resource for evaluating LLM performance and identifying areas for improvement in multilingual retrieval-augmented generation.
Vers une autre langue
à partir du contenu source
arxiv.org
Questions plus approfondies