Idée - Multi-agent reinforcement learning - # Language-Grounded Multi-Agent Communication for Ad-Hoc Teamwork

Aligning Multi-Agent Communication with Human Language for Effective Ad-Hoc Teamwork

Q: How can the proposed pipeline be extended to handle more complex team tasks with dynamic environments and heterogeneous agent capabilities?

The proposed pipeline, LangGround, can be extended to accommodate more complex team tasks and dynamic environments by incorporating several enhancements. First, integrating a more sophisticated environment model that allows for real-time changes in task dynamics would enable agents to adapt their communication strategies based on evolving scenarios. This could involve using simulation frameworks that support dynamic object interactions and environmental changes, allowing agents to learn from a broader range of experiences. Second, to address heterogeneous agent capabilities, the pipeline could be modified to include a mechanism for agents to share their unique skills and knowledge. This could be achieved through a multi-layered communication protocol where agents not only share observations but also their capabilities and intentions. By leveraging a hierarchical communication structure, agents can better coordinate their actions based on their individual strengths, leading to more efficient teamwork. Additionally, incorporating reinforcement learning techniques that emphasize exploration in diverse environments can enhance the adaptability of agents. By allowing agents to experiment with different communication strategies and actions in varied contexts, the system can foster the emergence of more robust and flexible communication protocols. Finally, integrating human-in-the-loop training could provide agents with real-time feedback, further refining their communication and collaboration skills in complex, dynamic settings.

Q: What are the potential limitations of using pre-trained LLMs as the sole source of language grounding, and how can we address them?

While pre-trained Large Language Models (LLMs) offer a powerful foundation for grounding agent communication in human language, there are several limitations to relying solely on them. One significant concern is the potential for "hallucinations," where LLMs generate plausible but incorrect or irrelevant information. This can lead to agents making decisions based on inaccurate communication, undermining task performance. To mitigate this, a hybrid approach could be employed, combining LLMs with domain-specific knowledge bases or expert systems that provide accurate contextual information relevant to the task at hand. Another limitation is the lack of real-time adaptability in LLMs. They are typically trained on static datasets and may not effectively respond to dynamic changes in the environment or the specific needs of the task. To address this, we can implement online learning mechanisms that allow agents to continuously update their communication strategies based on new experiences and interactions. This could involve using reinforcement learning to fine-tune the LLM's outputs based on feedback from the agents' performance in real-time scenarios. Furthermore, the reliance on LLMs may lead to a disconnect between the language used by agents and the specific terminologies or jargon relevant to particular tasks. To overcome this, we can incorporate task-specific training data that reflects the unique language and communication styles required for different environments. By combining LLMs with tailored datasets, we can enhance the relevance and effectiveness of the communication protocols developed by the agents.

Q: What insights can we gain from analyzing the emergent communication protocols in terms of their linguistic properties and cognitive plausibility compared to human language?

Analyzing the emergent communication protocols developed by agents provides valuable insights into their linguistic properties and cognitive plausibility. One key observation is the degree of semantic alignment between agent communication and human language. By evaluating the topographic similarity and semantic clustering of communication messages, we can assess how well the agents' language reflects human-like communication patterns. High levels of semantic coherence and meaningful clustering indicate that the agents are developing a communication system that is not only functional but also interpretable by humans. Additionally, examining the complexity and informativeness of the emergent protocols can reveal how agents balance the trade-off between utility and expressiveness. This analysis can shed light on the cognitive processes underlying language development, such as how agents prioritize information sharing and the efficiency of their communication strategies. Understanding these dynamics can inform theories of language evolution and cognitive science, particularly regarding how language emerges in social contexts. Moreover, the study of emergent communication can highlight the potential for compositionality in agent language, where agents combine simpler messages to convey more complex ideas. This property is crucial for cognitive plausibility, as it mirrors how humans use language to express nuanced thoughts. By investigating the compositional structures within the agents' communication, we can gain insights into the cognitive mechanisms that facilitate language learning and usage in multi-agent systems. Overall, the analysis of emergent communication protocols not only enhances our understanding of artificial agent interactions but also contributes to broader discussions in linguistics and cognitive science regarding the nature of language and communication.

Concepts de base

Introducing language grounding as an auxiliary learning objective enables multi-agent teams to learn human-interpretable communication protocols that maintain task performance and generalize to ad-hoc teamwork scenarios.

Résumé

The paper proposes a novel computational pipeline called LangGround that aligns the communication space between multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) agents and human natural language. The key ideas are:

Collect grounded communication samples from embodied large language model (LLM) agents interacting in the task environments. These samples are used to construct a supervised dataset D that maps agent observations and actions to natural language messages.
During MARL training, introduce an additional supervised learning loss that encourages the learned communication vectors to be similar to the corresponding natural language messages in D. This shapes the communication space to be semantically meaningful and interpretable to humans.

The results show that LangGround:

Maintains task performance compared to state-of-the-art MARL communication methods.
Exhibits semantically meaningful communication space aligned with human language, as evidenced by higher topographic similarity, cosine similarity, and BLEU scores compared to baselines.
Demonstrates zero-shot generalization capabilities in ad-hoc teamwork scenarios with unseen teammates and novel task states.
Enables effective collaboration between MARL agents and LLM agents in ad-hoc teams.

Overall, this work presents a significant step toward enabling effective communication and collaboration between artificial agents and humans in real-world teamwork settings.

Personnaliser le résumé

Réécrire avec l'IA

Générer des citations

Traduire la source

Vers une autre langue

Générer une carte mentale

à partir du contenu source

Voir la source

arxiv.org

Stats

The team score is awarded based on the number of tools used for defusing a bomb, with each tool use worth 10 points.
The maximum episode length in the Predator Prey environment is 20.

Citations

"Introducing language grounding as an auxiliary learning objective enables multi-agent teams to learn human-interpretable communication protocols that maintain task performance and generalize to ad-hoc teamwork scenarios."
"The proposed computational pipeline does not depend on specific MARL architecture or LLMs and should be generally compatible."

Idées clés tirées de

Language Grounded Multi-agent Communication for Ad-hoc Teamwork

by Huao Li, Hos... à arxiv.org 09-27-2024

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2409.17348.pdf

Language Grounded Multi-agent Communication for Ad-hoc Teamwork

Questions plus approfondies

How can the proposed pipeline be extended to handle more complex team tasks with dynamic environments and heterogeneous agent capabilities?

The proposed pipeline, LangGround, can be extended to accommodate more complex team tasks and dynamic environments by incorporating several enhancements. First, integrating a more sophisticated environment model that allows for real-time changes in task dynamics would enable agents to adapt their communication strategies based on evolving scenarios. This could involve using simulation frameworks that support dynamic object interactions and environmental changes, allowing agents to learn from a broader range of experiences.
Second, to address heterogeneous agent capabilities, the pipeline could be modified to include a mechanism for agents to share their unique skills and knowledge. This could be achieved through a multi-layered communication protocol where agents not only share observations but also their capabilities and intentions. By leveraging a hierarchical communication structure, agents can better coordinate their actions based on their individual strengths, leading to more efficient teamwork.
Additionally, incorporating reinforcement learning techniques that emphasize exploration in diverse environments can enhance the adaptability of agents. By allowing agents to experiment with different communication strategies and actions in varied contexts, the system can foster the emergence of more robust and flexible communication protocols. Finally, integrating human-in-the-loop training could provide agents with real-time feedback, further refining their communication and collaboration skills in complex, dynamic settings.

What are the potential limitations of using pre-trained LLMs as the sole source of language grounding, and how can we address them?

While pre-trained Large Language Models (LLMs) offer a powerful foundation for grounding agent communication in human language, there are several limitations to relying solely on them. One significant concern is the potential for "hallucinations," where LLMs generate plausible but incorrect or irrelevant information. This can lead to agents making decisions based on inaccurate communication, undermining task performance. To mitigate this, a hybrid approach could be employed, combining LLMs with domain-specific knowledge bases or expert systems that provide accurate contextual information relevant to the task at hand.
Another limitation is the lack of real-time adaptability in LLMs. They are typically trained on static datasets and may not effectively respond to dynamic changes in the environment or the specific needs of the task. To address this, we can implement online learning mechanisms that allow agents to continuously update their communication strategies based on new experiences and interactions. This could involve using reinforcement learning to fine-tune the LLM's outputs based on feedback from the agents' performance in real-time scenarios.
Furthermore, the reliance on LLMs may lead to a disconnect between the language used by agents and the specific terminologies or jargon relevant to particular tasks. To overcome this, we can incorporate task-specific training data that reflects the unique language and communication styles required for different environments. By combining LLMs with tailored datasets, we can enhance the relevance and effectiveness of the communication protocols developed by the agents.

What insights can we gain from analyzing the emergent communication protocols in terms of their linguistic properties and cognitive plausibility compared to human language?

Analyzing the emergent communication protocols developed by agents provides valuable insights into their linguistic properties and cognitive plausibility. One key observation is the degree of semantic alignment between agent communication and human language. By evaluating the topographic similarity and semantic clustering of communication messages, we can assess how well the agents' language reflects human-like communication patterns. High levels of semantic coherence and meaningful clustering indicate that the agents are developing a communication system that is not only functional but also interpretable by humans.
Additionally, examining the complexity and informativeness of the emergent protocols can reveal how agents balance the trade-off between utility and expressiveness. This analysis can shed light on the cognitive processes underlying language development, such as how agents prioritize information sharing and the efficiency of their communication strategies. Understanding these dynamics can inform theories of language evolution and cognitive science, particularly regarding how language emerges in social contexts.
Moreover, the study of emergent communication can highlight the potential for compositionality in agent language, where agents combine simpler messages to convey more complex ideas. This property is crucial for cognitive plausibility, as it mirrors how humans use language to express nuanced thoughts. By investigating the compositional structures within the agents' communication, we can gain insights into the cognitive mechanisms that facilitate language learning and usage in multi-agent systems.
Overall, the analysis of emergent communication protocols not only enhances our understanding of artificial agent interactions but also contributes to broader discussions in linguistics and cognitive science regarding the nature of language and communication.