Alapfogalmak
This paper provides a comprehensive review of three prominent DNA storage simulators - Storalator, MESA, and DeepSimulator - evaluating their capabilities, algorithms, and performance in simulating various aspects of the DNA storage process.
Kivonat
The paper begins by providing an overview of the DNA storage process, including the key steps of encoding, synthesis, sequencing, clustering, reconstruction, and decoding. It then delves into a detailed analysis of three DNA storage simulators:
Storalator:
- Simulates the DNA storage workflow from synthesis to reconstruction, including error simulation, clustering, and reconstruction algorithms.
- Supports various synthesis and sequencing technologies, allowing users to customize error profiles.
- Provides detailed analysis and visualization of simulation results.
- Does not include encoding, decoding, or storage/temperature effects.
MESA (Mosla Error Simulator):
- Focuses on simulating the effects of GC content, homopolymers, and motifs on synthesis and sequencing errors.
- Allows users to customize error probabilities for different synthesis and sequencing methods, as well as storage conditions.
- Provides a web-based interface for easy access and customization.
- Does not include clustering, reconstruction, encoding, or decoding.
DeepSimulator:
- Specializes in simulating Nanopore sequencing, using a deep learning-based approach to model the signal generation and basecalling process.
- Provides accurate simulation of Nanopore sequencing, including the effects of context-dependent errors.
- Does not cover other aspects of the DNA storage process, such as synthesis, storage, clustering, or reconstruction.
The paper also compares the three simulators in terms of ease of use, input/output formats, and the accuracy of their simulations. It highlights the strengths and limitations of each simulator, as well as the potential for future improvements and the incorporation of additional features.