This research paper addresses the misconception surrounding the non-observation of OJ 287's predicted flare in 2022.
The paper begins by outlining the established binary black hole model for OJ 287, which has successfully predicted previous flares. This model posits that the secondary black hole's impact with the primary's accretion disk causes observable flares.
The authors then clarify that the predicted 2022 flare coincided with a period when ground-based optical telescopes, the primary means of observing OJ 287, were unable to view the quasar due to its position in the sky. This observational limitation, known at the time of prediction, was often misinterpreted as uncertainty in the flare's timing.
The authors emphasize that the model's accuracy is supported by the successful observation of an early synchrotron flare in March 2022, which indicated that the main flare occurred ten days earlier than initially anticipated, falling within the period of observational blackout.
The paper refutes claims of a "missing flare problem," attributing such assertions to a misunderstanding of the observational constraints outlined in earlier research. The authors highlight that the 2022 light curve, excluding the period of observational blackout, aligns well with the 2005 light curve, further validating the existing model.
The paper concludes by emphasizing that the absence of the 2022 flare observation does not contradict the binary black hole model. Instead, it underscores the importance of considering observational limitations when interpreting astronomical predictions.
To Another Language
from source content
arxiv.org
Key Insights Distilled From
by Mauri J. Val... at arxiv.org 11-05-2024
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2411.00908.pdfDeeper Inquiries