insight - Computational Complexity - # Communicative Interpretation of Mathematical Expressions and Proofs

Core Concepts

Mathematical expressions and proofs convey rich communicative intentions beyond their purely symbolic representations, which can be leveraged by AI systems to better collaborate with humans.

Abstract

This paper argues that mathematical expressions and proofs generated by humans contain important communicative information that goes beyond their formal symbolic representations. The authors present two case studies demonstrating that large language models (LLMs) are sensitive to these communicative cues, even though traditional symbolic approaches often ignore them.

In the first case study, the authors show that LLMs interpret the equals sign asymmetrically, generating systematically different word problems for the same underlying equation depending on how it is arranged. This aligns with research in math education showing that humans also understand equations asymmetrically.

The second case study examines how LLMs prefer certain orderings of mathematical rules and proof steps, even though the orderings are logically equivalent. This suggests that LLMs pick up on the communicative conventions used by mathematicians when presenting formal content.

The authors argue that these communicative aspects of mathematics should not be ignored or explained away, but rather embraced by AI systems that aim to collaborate with humans in mathematical reasoning and problem-solving. They call for a "Communicative Math Hypothesis" that views math as a situated linguistic activity, rather than just a formal symbolic system.

To Another Language

from source content

arxiv.org

Stats

"Sally has 4 candies and receives 3 candies for every sticker she has. Jimmy has 9 candies for every sticker he has but loses 2 candies. If they end up with the same number of candies, how many stickers do they each have?"
"Alex has nine packs of trading cards, each with the same number of cards. He gives away 2 cards and now has 4 cards more than three packs of trading cards. How many cards are in each pack?"

Quotes

"Mathematical propositions are first of all English sentences; not only English sentences, but each mathematical proposition has a resemblance to certain non-mathematical propositions."
Ludwig Wittgenstein, Lectures on the Foundations of Mathematics, 1939

Key Insights Distilled From

by Sasha Bogura... at **arxiv.org** 09-26-2024

Deeper Inquiries

The communicative aspects of mathematics can be systematically modeled and incorporated into AI systems for mathematical reasoning by leveraging insights from linguistics and cognitive science. This involves recognizing that mathematical expressions are not merely symbolic representations but also convey rich communicative intentions. To achieve this, AI systems can be designed to:
Integrate Linguistic Context: AI models can be trained on datasets that include not only mathematical symbols but also the natural language descriptions and contexts in which these symbols are used. This can help models understand the pragmatic implications of mathematical expressions, such as the asymmetry of equations and the communicative intent behind different formulations.
Utilize Natural Language Processing (NLP) Techniques: By employing NLP techniques, AI systems can analyze the structure and semantics of mathematical language. This includes understanding how different phrases or keywords influence the interpretation of mathematical problems, similar to how humans use heuristics in problem-solving.
Incorporate User Interaction: AI systems can be designed to adapt to user inputs and preferences, allowing for a more interactive and communicative approach to mathematical reasoning. This could involve generating explanations or justifications for mathematical steps in a way that aligns with human reasoning patterns.
Model Proof Structures: AI can be trained to recognize and generate mathematical proofs that follow natural ordering and conventions used by mathematicians. This involves understanding the logical flow of arguments and the communicative purpose of each step in a proof.
Feedback Mechanisms: Implementing feedback loops where users can provide input on the clarity and comprehensibility of AI-generated mathematical content can help refine the models. This iterative process can enhance the model's ability to produce mathematically sound and communicatively effective outputs.
By systematically incorporating these communicative aspects, AI systems can become more aligned with human mathematical reasoning, ultimately improving their utility in educational and professional contexts.

While treating mathematics as a situated linguistic activity offers valuable insights, there are potential downsides and limitations to this approach:
Loss of Precision: Mathematics is often valued for its precision and unambiguity. By emphasizing the communicative aspects, there is a risk of introducing vagueness or ambiguity that can lead to misinterpretations or errors in reasoning. This is particularly critical in formal mathematical proofs where precision is paramount.
Overgeneralization: The communicative approach may lead to overgeneralizations that do not hold in all mathematical contexts. For instance, while heuristics may work well for elementary problems, they may not be applicable in more complex mathematical scenarios where formal logic is essential.
Cognitive Load: Emphasizing linguistic context may increase cognitive load for learners who are already struggling with mathematical concepts. If students are required to navigate both the symbolic and linguistic dimensions simultaneously, it may hinder their ability to grasp fundamental mathematical principles.
Incompatibility with Formal Systems: Many existing mathematical frameworks and computational systems are built on formal symbolic representations. Integrating a communicative approach may create challenges in compatibility with these systems, potentially complicating the development of hybrid models that effectively combine both approaches.
Subjectivity in Interpretation: The communicative nature of mathematics can introduce subjectivity, as different individuals may interpret mathematical expressions and problems differently based on their linguistic and cultural backgrounds. This variability can complicate the development of standardized AI systems that aim to provide universally applicable solutions.
Overall, while the communicative approach enriches our understanding of mathematics, it is essential to balance it with the rigor and precision that formal symbolic systems provide.

The insights from the work on the communicative nature of mathematics connect to broader questions about the role of language and communication in human cognition and intelligence in several significant ways:
Language as a Cognitive Tool: Language is a fundamental tool for human thought and reasoning. The way mathematical concepts are communicated reflects broader cognitive processes, suggesting that language shapes not only how we express mathematical ideas but also how we understand and manipulate them. This aligns with theories in cognitive science that emphasize the role of language in structuring thought.
Social Constructivism: The communicative approach to mathematics supports social constructivist theories of learning, which posit that knowledge is constructed through social interactions and communication. This perspective highlights the importance of collaborative learning environments where individuals can share and negotiate mathematical ideas, fostering deeper understanding.
Pragmatics in Reasoning: The emphasis on communicative intentions in mathematics underscores the role of pragmatics in reasoning. Just as language users rely on context and shared knowledge to interpret meaning, mathematicians often depend on contextual cues and conventions to convey complex ideas. This suggests that effective reasoning, whether in mathematics or other domains, is deeply intertwined with communicative practices.
Interdisciplinary Connections: The findings encourage interdisciplinary research that bridges mathematics, linguistics, and cognitive science. Understanding how mathematical reasoning is influenced by language can lead to new insights into human cognition, potentially informing educational practices and AI development.
Cognitive Flexibility: Recognizing the communicative aspects of mathematics may enhance cognitive flexibility, allowing individuals to approach problems from multiple perspectives. This adaptability is a hallmark of intelligence, suggesting that fostering an understanding of the interplay between language and mathematics can contribute to more robust cognitive skills.
In summary, the insights from the communicative nature of mathematics illuminate the intricate relationship between language, communication, and cognition, offering valuable perspectives on how humans reason and learn across various domains.

0