toplogo
Sign In

Unsupervised Neural Representation for Rigid Motion Correction in Undersampled Radial MRI


Core Concepts
An unsupervised neural representation approach that jointly solves artifact-free MR images and accurate motion from undersampled, rigid motion-corrupted k-space data, without requiring training data.
Abstract
The paper proposes Moner, an unsupervised deep learning method for addressing rigid motion artifacts in undersampled radial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The key innovations include: Integrating a quasi-static motion model into the implicit neural representation (INR) framework, enabling accurate estimation of the subject's rigid motion during MRI acquisition. Reformulating the radial MRI reconstruction as a back-projection problem using the Fourier-slice theorem, which mitigates the high dynamic range issues caused by the MRI k-space data and stabilizes the model optimization. Introducing a novel coarse-to-fine hash encoding strategy, which significantly improves the motion correction accuracy by balancing the trade-off between motion estimation and fine-detailed image reconstruction. The proposed Moner is an unsupervised method, eliminating the need for extensive high-quality MRI training data required by supervised deep learning approaches. Experiments on the fastMRI and MoDL datasets show that Moner achieves comparable performance to state-of-the-art motion correction techniques on in-domain data, while demonstrating significant improvements on out-of-domain data.
Stats
Radial MRI k-space data k(θ, ω) can be transformed into projection data g(θ, ρ) using the 1D inverse Fourier transform. The motion model has two parameters: rotation angle ϑi and shift vector τi for each acquisition view θi. The loss function L measures the errors between the estimated and real projections.
Quotes
"Our core idea is to leverage the continuous prior of implicit neural representation (INR) to constrain this ill-posed inverse problem, enabling ideal solutions." "We reformulate radial MRI as a back-projection problem using the Fourier-slice theorem. Additionally, we propose a novel coarse-to-fine hash encoding strategy, significantly enhancing MoCo accuracy."

Deeper Inquiries

How can the proposed Moner framework be extended to handle more diverse MRI sampling patterns beyond radial, such as Cartesian and spiral?

The Moner framework, which currently focuses on radial MRI, can be extended to accommodate diverse MRI sampling patterns like Cartesian and spiral by modifying its underlying mathematical formulations and optimization strategies. Adaptation of the Forward Model: The Fourier-slice theorem, which is central to Moner's current formulation, is specific to radial sampling. To extend Moner to Cartesian sampling, the framework can utilize the 2D Fourier transform directly, allowing for the reconstruction of images from Cartesian k-space data. For spiral sampling, the framework would need to incorporate a spiral trajectory model, which can be achieved by adjusting the projection data generation process to account for the non-linear sampling paths. Reformulation of the Optimization Pipeline: The optimization pipeline can be adapted to handle the different characteristics of Cartesian and spiral data. For instance, the integral projection model used in Moner can be modified to reflect the specific sampling geometry of these patterns, ensuring that the optimization process remains stable and effective. Incorporation of Motion Models: The motion model currently employed in Moner can also be generalized to account for the unique motion artifacts associated with different sampling patterns. This may involve developing new motion estimation techniques that are tailored to the specific dynamics of Cartesian and spiral acquisitions. Training and Evaluation: Finally, extensive training and evaluation on datasets that include various sampling patterns will be essential. This will help in fine-tuning the model parameters and ensuring that the Moner framework generalizes well across different MRI acquisition protocols.

What are the potential challenges and considerations in adapting the 2D Moner to 3D MRI motion correction?

Adapting the 2D Moner framework to 3D MRI motion correction presents several challenges and considerations: Increased Computational Complexity: The transition from 2D to 3D significantly increases the computational burden. The model must handle a larger volume of data, which requires more memory and processing power. Efficient algorithms and hardware acceleration (e.g., using GPUs) will be necessary to manage this complexity. Motion Model Generalization: The quasi-static motion model currently used in Moner is based on rigid motion assumptions. In 3D, the model must account for more complex motion dynamics, including non-rigid deformations and varying motion patterns across different anatomical regions. Developing a robust 3D motion model that can accurately capture these dynamics is crucial. Data Acquisition and Sampling Patterns: 3D MRI often involves different sampling strategies (e.g., 3D radial, Cartesian, or spiral). The Moner framework will need to be flexible enough to adapt to these various patterns while ensuring that the reconstruction process remains accurate and efficient. Integration of Priors: The incorporation of additional physical or physiological priors becomes more complex in 3D. The model must effectively leverage these priors to improve reconstruction quality while maintaining computational efficiency. Validation and Testing: Extensive validation on diverse 3D MRI datasets is essential to ensure that the adapted Moner framework performs well across different scenarios. This includes testing on datasets with varying motion artifacts and anatomical structures to assess the model's robustness and generalizability.

How can the Moner's motion estimation and image reconstruction be further improved by incorporating additional physical or physiological priors beyond the quasi-static rigid motion model?

The Moner's motion estimation and image reconstruction can be enhanced by integrating additional physical or physiological priors in several ways: Dynamic Motion Models: Beyond the quasi-static rigid motion model, incorporating dynamic motion models that account for varying motion patterns over time can significantly improve accuracy. For instance, using models that capture respiratory or cardiac motion can help in scenarios where these factors contribute to motion artifacts. Physiological Constraints: Integrating physiological priors, such as anatomical knowledge about tissue properties and expected motion patterns, can guide the reconstruction process. This can be achieved through the use of anatomical atlases or statistical shape models that inform the expected structure and motion of different tissues. Multi-Modal Data Fusion: Combining data from different imaging modalities (e.g., MRI with CT or PET) can provide complementary information that enhances motion estimation and image quality. This multi-modal approach can leverage the strengths of each modality to improve overall reconstruction fidelity. Regularization Techniques: Advanced regularization techniques that incorporate physical models of tissue behavior can help in constraining the solution space during reconstruction. For example, using total variation or wavelet-based regularization can preserve edges and fine details while reducing noise. Machine Learning Approaches: Employing machine learning techniques to learn motion patterns from large datasets can provide a more flexible and adaptive framework for motion estimation. This can include training models on diverse datasets to capture a wide range of motion scenarios, improving the model's ability to generalize to unseen data. By incorporating these additional priors, the Moner framework can achieve more accurate motion correction and higher-quality image reconstructions, ultimately enhancing its applicability in clinical settings.
0
visual_icon
generate_icon
translate_icon
scholar_search_icon
star