LearnedFTL: A Learning-Based Page-Level Flash Translation Layer for Reducing Double Reads in Flash-Based Solid-State Drives
Core Concepts
LearnedFTL employs learned indexes to improve the address translation efficiency of flash-based SSDs, reducing the number of double reads induced by address translation in random read accesses.
Abstract
LearnedFTL is a novel page-level flash translation layer (FTL) design that combines learned indexes with demand-based FTL to enhance the random read performance of flash-based SSDs.
Key highlights:
LearnedFTL proposes an in-place-update linear model equipped with a bitmap filter to guarantee the accuracy of model predictions, reducing the cost of inaccurate predictions.
It introduces a virtual PPN (VPPN) representation to convert the unordered PPNs from different parallel units into contiguous ones, enabling efficient learned index training.
LearnedFTL adopts a group-based allocation strategy and two model training strategies (sequential initialization and model training via GC) to reduce the training overhead.
By tightly integrating these techniques, LearnedFTL can considerably speed up address translation while reducing the number of flash read accesses caused by address translation.
Extensive experiments on a FEMU-based prototype show that LearnedFTL can reduce up to 55.5% address translation-induced double reads, leading to a 2.9x~12.2x reduction in P99 tail latency compared to state-of-the-art TPFTL and LeaFTL schemes.
LearnedFTL: A Learning-Based Page-Level FTL for Reducing Double Reads in Flash-Based SSDs
Stats
The experiments show that LearnedFTL can reduce up to 55.5% address translation-induced double reads.
LearnedFTL reduces the P99 tail latency by 2.9x~12.2x with an average of 5.5x and 8.2x compared to TPFTL and LeaFTL, respectively.
Quotes
"LearnedFTL considerably speeds up address translation while reducing the number of flash read accesses caused by address translation."
"LearnedFTL can reduce up to 55.5% address translation-induced double reads."
"LearnedFTL reduces the P99 tail latency by 2.9x~12.2x with an average of 5.5x and 8.2x compared to TPFTL and LeaFTL, respectively."
How can LearnedFTL's techniques be extended to other storage systems beyond flash-based SSDs to improve performance
LearnedFTL's techniques can be extended to other storage systems beyond flash-based SSDs by adapting the learned index approach to different storage technologies. For example, in HDDs, the learned index concept can be applied to optimize the address translation process and reduce the number of double reads. By utilizing machine learning models to predict data locations efficiently, HDDs can benefit from improved read performance and reduced latency. Additionally, in cloud storage systems, incorporating learned indexes can enhance data retrieval speed and overall system efficiency. By training models based on key-position mappings, cloud storage systems can optimize data access and improve user experience. Overall, the principles of LearnedFTL, such as in-place-update linear models and virtual PPN representation, can be adapted and implemented in various storage systems to enhance performance and address specific challenges.
What are the potential limitations or drawbacks of using learned indexes in FTL, and how can they be further addressed
While learned indexes offer significant advantages in terms of space savings and lookup speed, there are potential limitations and drawbacks that need to be considered. One limitation is the accuracy of the learned index models, as they may not always provide 100% accurate predictions. Inaccurate predictions can lead to additional read operations, impacting performance. To address this, techniques such as incorporating bitmap filters to verify predictions and implementing model training strategies via garbage collection can help improve accuracy. Another drawback is the complexity of model training, which can introduce overhead during write operations. This challenge can be mitigated by optimizing training processes, such as sequential initialization and model training via GC, to minimize performance impact. Additionally, the conflict between the linear model and access parallelism in SSDs can pose challenges in maintaining contiguous PPNs for sorted LPNs. Strategies like virtual PPN representation can help overcome this limitation by transforming non-contiguous PPNs into sequential ones. By addressing these limitations and drawbacks, the effectiveness and efficiency of learned indexes in FTL can be further enhanced.
What are the implications of LearnedFTL's approach on the overall energy efficiency and wear-leveling of flash-based SSDs
LearnedFTL's approach has implications on the overall energy efficiency and wear-leveling of flash-based SSDs. By reducing the number of double reads and optimizing address translation efficiency, LearnedFTL can contribute to energy savings in SSDs. The improved read performance and reduced latency result in faster data access, leading to lower energy consumption during read operations. Additionally, the use of learned indexes can help distribute read/write operations more evenly across the SSD, potentially extending the lifespan of the storage device. The efficient utilization of models and the reduction of unnecessary read operations contribute to wear-leveling by minimizing the stress on individual flash cells. Overall, LearnedFTL's approach can enhance energy efficiency, prolong SSD lifespan, and improve wear-leveling mechanisms in flash-based storage systems.
0
Visualize This Page
Generate with Undetectable AI
Translate to Another Language
Scholar Search
Table of Content
LearnedFTL: A Learning-Based Page-Level Flash Translation Layer for Reducing Double Reads in Flash-Based Solid-State Drives
LearnedFTL: A Learning-Based Page-Level FTL for Reducing Double Reads in Flash-Based SSDs
How can LearnedFTL's techniques be extended to other storage systems beyond flash-based SSDs to improve performance
What are the potential limitations or drawbacks of using learned indexes in FTL, and how can they be further addressed
What are the implications of LearnedFTL's approach on the overall energy efficiency and wear-leveling of flash-based SSDs