Core Concepts
The authors construct a succinct classical argument system for QMA, the quantum analogue of NP, from generic and standard cryptographic assumptions such as collapsing hash functions and a mild version of quantum homomorphic encryption. This avoids the need for the stronger assumption of post-quantum indistinguishability obfuscation required in prior work.
Abstract
The authors present a new approach to constructing succinct classical arguments for QMA problems, building on prior work on quantum verification and the compilation of quantum nonlocal games into cryptographic argument systems.
Key highlights:
The authors avoid the use of post-quantum indistinguishability obfuscation, which was required in previous work, by instead relying on weaker cryptographic primitives such as collapsing hash functions and a mild version of quantum homomorphic encryption.
They start with a question-succinct two-prover protocol for QMA and then compile it into a succinct single-prover argument system using the KLVY transformation.
The analysis of the compiled protocol involves new techniques from approximate representation theory, including a version of the Gowers-Hatami theorem that supports non-uniform distributions.
The authors also develop a succinct version of the Pauli braiding test, building on the work of de la Salle, and show how to analyze it in the compiled setting.
The final protocol achieves constant completeness-soundness gap and polylogarithmic communication complexity, all from standard cryptographic assumptions.