Core Concepts

UMAP's fundamental assumptions and techniques have a natural interpretation via Information Geometry.

Abstract

In this comprehensive analysis, the connection between UMAP and Information Geometry is explored. UMAP, initially rooted in Category Theory, is revealed to have a geometric interpretation. The algorithm aims to embed high-dimensional data into a lower-dimensional space while preserving proximity. Key steps include conformal rescaling, defining edge probabilities based on distance metrics, symmetrization of weights, and cross-entropy minimization. The implementation may differ from theoretical claims due to sampling strategies. Uniform distribution assumptions on Riemannian manifolds are crucial for accurate embeddings. Different probability kernels impact clustering results across datasets like Iris, MNIST, and Fashion MNIST. The equivalence of cross-entropy and KL-divergence in learning dynamics is highlighted. Future research directions involve exploring Vietoris-Rips complexes for capturing hidden structures in data.

Stats

pi|j = exp(-d(Xi, Xj) - ρi / σi)
wl(e) = (1 + a∥yi − yj∥2b / 2 )^-1
H(X, Y ) = -X wh(e) log wl(e) + (1 - wh(e)) log(1 - wl(e))

Quotes

"In essence, by creating a custom distance in the neighborhood of each Xi we can ensure the validity of the assumption of uniform distribution on the manifold."
"Symmetrisation is necessary since UMAP needs to adjust the rescaled metrics on Bi’s: the degree of belief of the edge i ∼ j may not be equal to the degree of belief of j ∼ i."
"The Kullback–Leibner divergence and the cross–entropy loss functions induce the same learning dynamics for lower–dimensional similarities."

Key Insights Distilled From

by Alexander Ko... at **arxiv.org** 03-18-2024

Deeper Inquiries

Incorporating topological data analysis through Vietoris-Rips complexes can enhance UMAP's performance by capturing essential topology at varying levels of coarseness. The V R-complexes allow for the detection of hidden structures in high-dimensional data that may not be apparent with traditional methods like kNN-graphs. By building the V R-complex on X and computing probabilities based on its simplices, UMAP can potentially reveal more intricate relationships within the data. This approach leverages persistence homology to determine threshold values for delta, enabling a deeper understanding of the dataset's underlying structure.

The choice of probability kernels in UMAP has significant implications on clustering accuracy across diverse datasets. Different kernels, such as Gaussian, quadratic, Morse, harmonic oscillator, or constant functions, impact how proximity is measured between data points. Through numeric experiments on standard datasets like Iris, MNIST hand-written digits, and Fashion MNIST using various kernels for defining high-dimensional probabilities, it was observed that each kernel led to slightly different but similar results in terms of clustering scores (ARS and AMIS) and geometric silhouette score. The selection of an appropriate kernel depends on the dataset characteristics and desired outcomes.

UMAP's optimization process addresses both nearness and separation in lower-dimensional embeddings by minimizing cross-entropy while considering repulsion forces between non-connected vertices from the high-dimensional kNN-graph. The algorithm seeks to embed the high-dimensional probability distribution into a lower-dimensional space with minimal distortion while ensuring that both close points in the original space remain close after embedding (nearness) and distant points maintain reasonable separation (separation). By introducing a repulsion coefficient alpha to account for far-apart points' positioning in Y corresponding to X's non-connected vertices ensures a comprehensive representation preserving local neighborhood relationships effectively during optimization.

0