The BRAM is the Limit: Achieving High Clock Speeds and Scalability in FPGA-Based PIM Accelerators by Challenging Common Design Assumptions
Core Concepts
This paper proposes a "Gold Standard" for designing FPGA-based PIM accelerators, emphasizing maximum BRAM clock frequency and linear scaling of compute density, and presents IMAGine, a GEMV engine, as a proof-of-concept demonstrating the feasibility of these goals.
Abstract
- Bibliographic Information: Kabir, M. A., Kamucheka, T., Fredricks, N., Mandebi, J., Bakos, J., Huang, M., & Andrews, D. (2024). The BRAM is the Limit: Shattering Myths, Shaping Standards, and Building Scalable PIM Accelerators. In 2024 32nd IEEE International Symposium on Field-Programmable Custom Computing Machines (FCCM). (Accepted for publication)
- Research Objective: This paper aims to define a "Gold Standard" for FPGA-based PIM accelerator design, addressing limitations in existing designs that fail to fully utilize BRAM capabilities. It also presents IMAGine, a novel PIM-based GEMV engine, as a case study to demonstrate the feasibility of achieving these standards.
- Methodology: The authors analyze existing PIM designs, identifying common limitations in clock frequency and scalability. They propose a "Gold Standard" based on maximizing BRAM clock frequency and achieving linear scaling of compute density with BRAM count. They then present the design and implementation of IMAGine, a GEMV engine, meticulously optimized to approach the proposed standards.
- Key Findings: The study reveals that existing PIM designs often operate at significantly lower clock frequencies than the theoretical maximum allowed by BRAMs. Additionally, they struggle to scale compute density linearly with BRAM count. IMAGine, however, achieves the BRAM's maximum clock frequency and scales to utilize 100% of available BRAMs, demonstrating the feasibility of the proposed "Gold Standard."
- Main Conclusions: The authors conclude that achieving high clock speeds and scalability in FPGA-based PIM accelerators is possible by adhering to the proposed "Gold Standard." They emphasize the importance of careful design choices and optimization techniques to overcome limitations observed in previous designs.
- Significance: This research provides a valuable framework for designing efficient and high-performance FPGA-based PIM accelerators. The proposed "Gold Standard" and the successful implementation of IMAGine offer practical guidance for researchers and developers in the field.
- Limitations and Future Research: The paper focuses on AMD FPGA families. Further research is needed to evaluate the applicability of the "Gold Standard" to other FPGA architectures. Additionally, exploring the energy efficiency of designs adhering to these standards would be beneficial.
Translate Source
To Another Language
Generate MindMap
from source content
The BRAM is the Limit: Shattering Myths, Shaping Standards, and Building Scalable PIM Accelerators
Stats
Existing PIM designs on FPGAs typically operate at 2.1x - 3.7x slower clock speeds than the maximum frequency supported by BRAMs.
IMAGine achieves a system clock speed of 737 MHz on an AMD Alveo U55 FPGA, matching the BRAM's maximum frequency.
IMAGine utilizes 100% of the available BRAMs on the Alveo U55, providing 64K bit-serial processing elements.
Google's TPU v1 and v2, custom ASIC accelerators, operate at 700 MHz.
Alibaba's Hanguang 800, another custom ASIC accelerator, also operates at 700 MHz.
Quotes
"These limitations have served as motivation for researchers to propose redesigned Block-RAM (BRAMs)-LUT integrated PIM tiles to increase compute densities of FPGAs. While compute density is increased the maximum BRAM clock frequency is reduced similar to overlays."
"This paper first lays out a set of design objectives that form a 'Gold Standard' or theoretical upper limit for BRAM-LUT-based PIM array architectures."
"We present IMAGine, an In-Memory Accelerated GEMV engine, as the fastest FPGA PIM-based GEMV accelerator that clocks faster than Google’s TPU v1-v2."
Deeper Inquiries
How can the proposed "Gold Standard" be adapted for emerging memory technologies beyond traditional SRAM-based BRAMs in future FPGAs?
The "Gold Standard" presented, while focused on SRAM-based BRAMs, provides a robust framework adaptable to emerging memory technologies in future FPGAs. Here's how it can be tailored:
Identify the Bottleneck: The core principle of targeting the slowest component remains crucial. With new memory technologies like MRAM, RRAM, or PCRAM integrated as BRAM alternatives, their specific latency and bandwidth characteristics become the new targets. The Gold Standard would then shift to achieving the maximum frequency and bandwidth permitted by these novel memory blocks.
Redefine Ideal Clocking: Instead of BRAM Fmax, the maximum frequency (Fmax) of the new memory technology dictates the ideal clocking. The design principles of minimizing logic depth and optimizing routing still apply but are now tailored to the performance limits of the new memory.
Scaling Metrics: Peak performance scaling needs recalibration. While linear scaling with memory capacity is generally desirable, the specific metrics might change. For instance, some emerging memories might have different capacities or access time trade-offs compared to SRAM. The Gold Standard would then focus on maximizing performance within the constraints of the new memory technology.
Reduction Latency Model: The reduction latency model (Equations 1 & 2) requires adjustments. The parameters 'a', 'b', and 'c' need to be re-evaluated based on the latency characteristics of the new memory and the interconnect architecture of the FPGA. The focus should be on minimizing data movement overhead, which could be different for various emerging memories.
Power-Aware Design: Power consumption becomes increasingly critical with emerging memories. The Gold Standard should incorporate power-aware design principles. This might involve optimizing data access patterns to minimize memory read/write energy or exploring near-memory computing paradigms to reduce data movement.
In essence, the Gold Standard's principles of maximizing performance and scalability remain relevant. However, the specific metrics and design considerations need to be adapted to the unique properties of each emerging memory technology.
While IMAGine demonstrates impressive clock speed and scalability, could a focus on maximizing these metrics potentially lead to trade-offs in other areas, such as power consumption or resource utilization efficiency for specific applications?
You are right to point out that maximizing clock speed and scalability in IMAGine, while impressive, could potentially lead to trade-offs:
Power Consumption: Higher clock speeds generally correlate with increased power consumption. While the paper doesn't delve into power analysis, it's a crucial consideration. Pushing for BRAM Fmax might not be energy-efficient for all applications, especially those with lower compute intensity or less stringent latency requirements.
Resource Utilization Efficiency: IMAGine achieves 100% BRAM utilization, which is ideal for maximizing compute density. However, this might not be optimal for all applications. Some applications might have smaller data sets or irregular computation patterns, leading to underutilized BRAMs and lower resource efficiency.
Application-Specific Optimizations: The focus on general-purpose scalability and clock speed might limit application-specific optimizations. For instance, certain applications might benefit from specialized dataflows or reduced precision arithmetic, which might not align with the Gold Standard's focus on maximizing raw compute density.
Increased Control Logic: Achieving high clock speeds often necessitates pipelining and complex control logic. This can increase resource utilization beyond the PIM array itself, potentially offsetting some of the gains in compute density.
Mitigating Trade-offs:
Dynamic Voltage and Frequency Scaling (DVFS): Implementing DVFS can allow IMAGine to operate at lower frequencies and voltages when peak performance isn't required, saving power.
Configurable Architecture: Introducing configurability in the PIM array, such as the ability to partition or reconfigure the array size, can improve resource utilization for diverse applications.
Application-Specific Design Exploration: While the Gold Standard provides a good baseline, exploring application-specific designs that optimize for factors like power consumption or resource utilization for specific data sets and algorithms is crucial.
In conclusion, while maximizing clock speed and scalability is beneficial, a balanced approach considering power consumption, resource utilization efficiency, and application-specific needs is essential for designing practical and efficient PIM-based accelerators.
If the limitations of traditional von Neumann architectures are addressed through innovations like PIM, how might the nature of software and algorithm design change to fully exploit these new architectures?
The shift towards PIM architectures like IMAGine necessitates a significant evolution in software and algorithm design to fully harness their potential:
Data-Centric Programming Models: Traditional software focuses on instruction flow. PIM necessitates a shift towards data-centric programming, where the emphasis is on expressing data access patterns and computations performed on data residing in memory.
Locality-Aware Algorithms: Algorithms need to be designed with data locality in mind. Exploiting the proximity of processing elements to memory requires algorithms that minimize data movement between memory and processing units.
Fine-Grained Parallelism: PIM architectures offer massive fine-grained parallelism. Algorithms need to be redesigned to decompose problems into smaller, independent tasks that can be executed concurrently by the numerous processing elements within the memory.
In-Memory Data Structures: Traditional data structures are optimized for von Neumann architectures. New in-memory data structures need to be developed, taking advantage of the memory organization and processing capabilities within PIM to enable efficient data representation and manipulation.
New Compilers and Tools: Existing compilers and software tools are not equipped to handle the unique characteristics of PIM. New compilation techniques are needed to map high-level code to efficient low-level implementations that exploit the parallelism and memory hierarchy of PIM architectures.
Abstraction Layers: Software libraries and APIs need to provide higher-level abstractions that hide the complexities of PIM architectures from programmers. This will allow software developers to focus on application logic rather than low-level hardware details.
Hybrid Programming Models: It's unlikely that PIM will completely replace traditional architectures. Hybrid programming models that combine the strengths of both PIM and conventional processors will be crucial. This requires developing techniques for efficient data movement and synchronization between different processing units.
In conclusion, PIM architectures represent a paradigm shift in computing. To fully unlock their potential, software and algorithm design must evolve to embrace data-centricity, locality, fine-grained parallelism, and new programming models tailored to the unique capabilities of these architectures.