insight - Machine learning, statistics - # Distribution-free uncertainty quantification with adaptive risk tradeoffs

Core Concepts

The authors develop methods that allow for valid control of multiple risks when the tradeoff parameters are chosen adaptively, without making distributional assumptions.

Abstract

The content discusses the problem of uncertainty quantification in modern machine learning, where complex prediction models are often used in autonomous decision-making systems. Existing conformal prediction methods can provide valid risk guarantees, but assume that the tolerance level and risk function are chosen in advance, before observing any data.
The authors show that naively applying these methods can lead to significant violations of the risk guarantees when the tolerance level is chosen in a data-dependent way, which is common in practice. To address this issue, the authors develop new methods that permit valid control of risks even when the tradeoff parameters are chosen adaptively.
The key contributions are:
A nonasymptotic concentration inequality for monotone losses, which provides a conservative but distribution-free upper bound on the risks.
An asymptotic result based on a functional central limit theorem, which allows for tighter, variance-adaptive upper bounds using a bootstrap procedure (risk resampling).
An extension of the bootstrap procedure (restricted risk resampling) that provides even tighter bounds by restricting the parameter space to a data-dependent subset.
Extensions to handle non-monotone risks by monotonizing the loss function, and to handle combinations of multiple monotone risks.
The authors demonstrate the benefits of their approach through numerical experiments on synthetic data and the MS-COCO image dataset.

Stats

The false negative rate (FNR) is the number of false negatives over true positives.
The false positive rate (FPR) is the number of false positives over true negatives.
The false discovery rate (FDR) is the expectation of the number of false positives over selected classes.
The SetSize is the expectation of the normalized number of selected classes.

Quotes

"Decision-making pipelines are generally characterized by tradeoffs among various risk functions. It is often desirable to manage such tradeoffs in a data-adaptive manner."
"Practitioners, on the other hand, often select tolerance levels in a data-dependent way, invalidating the guarantees of UQ methods and hindering their applicability."
"The present work addresses this problem by providing risk guarantees that account for data-dependent, post hoc choices of α."

Key Insights Distilled From

by Drew T. Nguy... at **arxiv.org** 03-29-2024

Deeper Inquiries

The proposed methods can be extended to handle more complex risk functions by considering a broader range of risk measures and incorporating them into the framework. One way to do this is to generalize the concept of monotonically-indexed function classes to accommodate a wider variety of risk functions. By allowing for more flexible relationships between the risk measures and the parameter of interest, the framework can be adapted to handle non-monotone risks and more intricate tradeoffs among multiple risks. Additionally, the methodology can be enhanced to support non-monotone losses by developing techniques to monotonize these functions and derive appropriate confidence bounds. This extension would enable the application of the methodology to a broader set of problems in machine learning and statistics where risk management is crucial.

The theoretical limitations of the uniform convergence results presented in the context may include constraints related to the assumptions made about the underlying data distribution and the complexity of the risk functions. One potential limitation could be the reliance on the monotonicity assumption, which may not hold in all practical scenarios. To improve the results, one approach could involve relaxing the monotonicity requirement and developing methods that can handle non-monotone risks more effectively. Additionally, the bounds derived from empirical process theory may have limitations in terms of their applicability to high-dimensional data or complex models. Enhancements in the methodology could involve exploring alternative concentration inequalities or developing more efficient algorithms for risk control in distribution-free prediction settings.

The ideas of restricted risk resampling can be applied to various areas of machine learning and statistics beyond uncertainty quantification. One potential application is in model selection and hyperparameter tuning, where the methodology can be used to control the risk associated with different choices of models or parameter settings. By incorporating the concept of restricted risk resampling, practitioners can make data-driven decisions on model selection while ensuring that the chosen model or parameters meet certain risk criteria. Additionally, the framework can be extended to anomaly detection, where the goal is to identify unusual patterns or outliers in data. By adapting the methodology to handle non-monotone risks and complex tradeoffs, it can provide robust and reliable solutions for anomaly detection tasks.

0