Core Concepts
A computationally efficient 1D-Bi-GRU deep learning model can accurately detect atrial fibrillation, premature atrial contractions, and premature ventricular contractions from smartwatch photoplethysmography signals collected in real-life settings, outperforming state-of-the-art methods.
Abstract
The authors developed a computationally efficient 1D-Bi-GRU deep learning model to classify normal sinus rhythm, atrial fibrillation, and premature atrial/ventricular contractions using multimodal data from smartwatch photoplethysmography (PPG), heart rate, and accelerometer signals.
The model was trained and tested on the Pulsewatch dataset, which contains real-world smartwatch PPG data collected from older stroke survivors over 14 days, with simultaneous ECG recordings as the ground truth.
The key highlights are:
- The proposed model achieved an unprecedented 83% sensitivity for premature atrial/ventricular contraction (PAC/PVC) detection, outperforming the previous state-of-the-art by 20.81%.
- The model maintained a high accuracy of 97.31% for atrial fibrillation (AF) detection, outperforming the previous best by 2.55%.
- The model is computationally efficient, with 14 times fewer parameters and 2.7 times faster inference than previous state-of-the-art models.
- The use of multimodal data, including heart rate and accelerometer signals, was crucial for improving the performance, especially for PAC/PVC detection.
- The model was evaluated using a subject-independent testing approach, demonstrating its potential for generalizability.
Stats
The dataset used in this study contained 116,313 PPG segments from 72 subjects, including 78,719 normal sinus rhythm, 24,555 atrial fibrillation, and 13,039 premature atrial/ventricular contraction segments.
Quotes
"Our multimodal model tested on 72 subjects achieved an unprecedented 83% sensitivity for PAC/PVC detection while maintaining a high accuracy of 97.31% for AF detection."
"These results outperformed the best state-of-the-art model by 20.81% for PAC/PVC and 2.55% for AF detection even while our model was computationally more efficient (14 times lighter and 2.7 faster)."