toplogo
Sign In

TRACER: Using Bayesian Inference in Offline Reinforcement Learning for Robustness Against Corrupted Data


Core Concepts
TRACER, a novel robust offline reinforcement learning algorithm, leverages Bayesian inference and an entropy-based uncertainty measure to effectively handle diverse data corruptions and improve performance in clean environments.
Abstract
  • Bibliographic Information: Yang, R., Wang, J., Wu, G., & Li, B. (2024). Uncertainty-based Offline Variational Bayesian Reinforcement Learning for Robustness under Diverse Data Corruptions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 38.

  • Research Objective: This paper introduces TRACER, a novel algorithm designed to address the challenge of learning robust agents in offline reinforcement learning (RL) scenarios where the dataset is prone to diverse data corruptions.

  • Methodology: TRACER employs variational Bayesian inference to capture the uncertainty in the action-value function caused by corrupted data. It models all data corruptions as uncertainty in the action-value function and utilizes all offline data as observations to approximate the posterior distribution of the action-value function. Additionally, TRACER introduces an entropy-based uncertainty measure to distinguish corrupted data from clean data, thereby regulating the loss associated with corrupted data and minimizing its influence on the learning process.

  • Key Findings: Experimental results demonstrate that TRACER significantly outperforms several state-of-the-art offline RL methods across a range of both individual and simultaneous data corruptions in MuJoCo and CARLA benchmarks. The results highlight TRACER's ability to learn robust agents and achieve superior performance in clean environments despite being trained on corrupted datasets.

  • Main Conclusions: This study successfully introduces Bayesian inference into corruption-robust offline RL, demonstrating its effectiveness in capturing uncertainty caused by diverse corrupted data. The use of an entropy-based uncertainty measure further enhances TRACER's robustness by effectively identifying and mitigating the influence of corrupted data during training.

  • Significance: This research significantly contributes to the field of robust offline RL by providing a novel approach to handle diverse data corruptions, a common challenge in real-world applications. TRACER's ability to learn robust agents from corrupted datasets has significant implications for deploying RL agents in safety-critical domains where data reliability is paramount.

  • Limitations and Future Research: While TRACER demonstrates promising results, future research could explore its application to more complex environments and investigate its scalability to larger datasets. Additionally, exploring alternative uncertainty measures and their impact on TRACER's performance could further enhance its robustness and applicability.

edit_icon

Customize Summary

edit_icon

Rewrite with AI

edit_icon

Generate Citations

translate_icon

Translate Source

visual_icon

Generate MindMap

visit_icon

Visit Source

Stats
TRACER achieves an average score improvement of +21.1% on MuJoCo tasks under diverse corruptions. TRACER shows an average score gain of +22.4% under random simultaneous data corruptions. TRACER outperforms previous algorithms in 7 out of 12 settings for individual random data corruptions. TRACER achieves an average score improvement of +19.3% under adversarial simultaneous corruptions. TRACER outperforms other algorithms in 7 out of 12 settings for individual adversarial data corruptions. TRACER achieves an average score improvement of +33.6% on Mujoco datasets with various corruption levels.
Quotes
"To the best of our knowledge, this study introduces Bayesian inference into corruption-robust offline RL for the first time." "By introducing an entropy-based uncertainty measure, TRACER can distinguish corrupted from clean data, thereby regulating the loss associated with corrupted samples to reduce its influence for robustness." "Experiment results show that TRACER significantly outperforms several state-of-the-art offline RL methods across a range of both individual and simultaneous data corruptions."

Deeper Inquiries

How might TRACER's approach be adapted to handle continuously changing or evolving data corruptions in real-time applications?

Adapting TRACER for continuously changing data corruptions in real-time applications presents a significant challenge and would require several key modifications: 1. Online Adaptation of the Variational Posterior: Dynamically Updating Priors: Instead of a fixed prior, incorporate a mechanism to update the prior distribution of the action-value function p(Dθ|S,A,R) in an online fashion. This could involve learning a separate model to track the evolving corruption patterns and adjust the prior accordingly. Continual Learning for Variational Parameters: Implement a continual learning approach to update the variational parameters (φs, φa, φr) in real-time. This would allow the model to adapt to shifts in the data distribution caused by evolving corruptions. 2. Evolving Entropy-Based Threshold: Adaptive Thresholding: The current entropy-based uncertainty measure relies on a fixed threshold to distinguish between clean and corrupted data. Implement an adaptive thresholding mechanism that dynamically adjusts based on the observed entropy distribution over time. This could involve techniques like moving averages or online outlier detection methods. 3. Incorporating New Data and Forgetting Outdated Corruptions: Data Weighting Based on Recency: Introduce a weighting scheme that prioritizes recent data points over older ones. This would help the model adapt to new corruption patterns while gradually forgetting outdated ones. Selective Retraining: Periodically retrain the model on a carefully selected subset of recent data that balances clean and corrupted samples representative of the current environment. Challenges: Computational Cost: Online adaptation of Bayesian inference and continual learning can be computationally expensive. Efficient approximations and implementations would be crucial for real-time performance. Concept Drift: Rapidly changing corruptions might lead to severe concept drift, making it difficult for the model to adapt effectively. Robustness to concept drift would be a key consideration. Overall, adapting TRACER for real-time applications with evolving corruptions would require a shift towards online learning and a focus on dynamic adaptation of its key components.

Could focusing solely on minimizing the influence of corrupted data potentially lead to overfitting to the clean data and limit the generalizability of the learned policy?

Yes, focusing solely on minimizing the influence of corrupted data in TRACER could potentially lead to overfitting to the clean data and limit the generalizability of the learned policy. Here's why: Bias-Variance Trade-off: By heavily down-weighting the loss associated with corrupted data, the model might become overly reliant on the clean data. This can reduce the variance in the learned policy (less affected by noisy data) but increase its bias towards the specific clean data distribution encountered during training. Limited Exploration: Overfitting to clean data might result in a policy that is overly confident in regions of the state-action space well-represented by the clean data. This can hinder exploration in other areas, potentially missing out on better policies. Sensitivity to Out-of-Distribution Data: A policy overfit to clean data might perform poorly when encountering data that deviates significantly from the clean distribution, even if these deviations are not due to explicit corruptions. Mitigation Strategies: Regularization: Introduce regularization techniques, such as weight decay or dropout, to prevent overfitting to the clean data. Data Augmentation: Generate synthetic variations of the clean data to increase its diversity and improve the model's ability to generalize. Curriculum Learning: Gradually increase the influence of the corrupted data during training. This could involve starting with a higher weight for the clean data loss and gradually annealing it towards a more balanced weighting scheme. Robust Optimization Techniques: Explore robust optimization methods that explicitly account for uncertainty in the data during training, aiming to learn policies that are less sensitive to perturbations. It's crucial to strike a balance between mitigating the effects of corrupted data and ensuring the generalizability of the learned policy. Incorporating techniques that promote robustness and generalization can help prevent overfitting and improve the reliability of the agent in diverse environments.

If we view the corrupted data as unexpected variations in the environment, how can TRACER's ability to handle uncertainty be applied to improve the adaptability and resilience of RL agents in dynamic and unpredictable real-world scenarios?

Viewing corrupted data as unexpected variations in the environment provides a valuable perspective on the potential applications of TRACER's uncertainty handling capabilities. Here's how it can improve adaptability and resilience in dynamic scenarios: 1. Robustness to Environmental Noise and Sensor Errors: Real-World Data is Noisy: TRACER's ability to distinguish between clean and corrupted data, even without explicit labels, makes it naturally suited for handling noisy sensor readings or environmental fluctuations that are common in real-world applications. Reliable Decision-Making: By down-weighting the influence of uncertain or unreliable data, TRACER can enable agents to make more robust decisions, even when faced with imperfect or incomplete information. 2. Adapting to Changing Dynamics: Uncertainty as a Proxy for Change: Sudden shifts in environmental dynamics can be interpreted as introducing high uncertainty in the agent's learned model. TRACER's entropy-based uncertainty measure can act as a signal for detecting such changes. Triggering Exploration and Adaptation: When high uncertainty is detected, the agent can be prompted to increase its exploration rate or engage in targeted learning to quickly adapt to the new dynamics. 3. Handling Unexpected Events and Out-of-Distribution States: Generalization Beyond Training Data: While TRACER is trained on a fixed offline dataset, its ability to handle uncertainty can translate to better generalization when encountering out-of-distribution states or unexpected events not explicitly present in the training data. Safe Exploration: By quantifying uncertainty, TRACER can guide the agent towards safer exploration strategies, avoiding actions associated with high uncertainty and potentially catastrophic outcomes. 4. Continual Learning and Open-World RL: Lifelong Learning: TRACER's core principles of Bayesian inference and uncertainty estimation align well with continual learning paradigms. By continuously updating its beliefs about the environment based on new data, the agent can adapt to long-term changes and improve its performance over time. Open-World Challenges: In open-world RL, agents encounter novel situations and tasks not seen during training. TRACER's ability to handle uncertainty can be crucial for navigating such environments, enabling agents to identify and adapt to the unknown. In essence, TRACER's ability to handle uncertainty provides a valuable tool for building more adaptable and resilient RL agents. By interpreting corrupted data as unexpected variations, we can leverage its uncertainty estimation capabilities to enable agents to thrive in dynamic and unpredictable real-world scenarios.
0
star