Core Concepts

Introducing a canonical tree decomposition for order types based on mutually avoiding sets, leading to unique chirotope trees.

Abstract

The article introduces a novel concept of decomposing planar point sets into trees decorated with smaller chirotopes. This decomposition is based on mutually avoiding sets, adapting the modular decomposition of graphs. The key contributions include introducing a canonical chirotope tree representing each chirotope uniquely and showing that most realizable chirotopes are indecomposable. The number of triangulations of a chirotope can be efficiently computed from its parts' triangulations. The paper also discusses abstract chirotopes and their properties, such as symmetry, interiority, and transitivity. It explores the relationship between modules in chirotopes and mutually avoiding subsets in planar point sets.

Stats

We show how the number of triangulations of a chirotope given by a chirotope tree can be computed from the (weighted) numbers of triangulations of its nodes.
For large n, we have 3n − O(n^-2) realizable chirotopes tend to be indecomposable.
The number of triangulations of χT can be computed from the polynomials {Pv : v a node of T} in time O(24kn^2km).

Quotes

"Most realizable chirotopes are indecomposable."
"The paper introduces a novel concept of decomposing planar point sets into trees decorated with smaller chirotopes."

Deeper Inquiries

To find a partition or compute the canonical tree for a given realizable chirotope efficiently, we can leverage the properties and algorithms discussed in the context. The process involves identifying mutually avoiding subsets that cover the entire chirotope, which leads to a unique canonical chirotope tree representation.
Efficiently finding a partition involves analyzing the extreme elements of the chirotope and determining modules based on these elements. By following specific criteria and utilizing geometric constructions, one can identify partitions that satisfy certain constraints related to line separations within the point set.
Computing the canonical tree for a realizable chirotope requires careful consideration of its structure and decomposition into smaller parts represented by convex or indecomposable chirotopes at each node. This computation involves recursive analysis guided by well-defined rules to ensure uniqueness and accuracy in representing the original chirotope as a tree.
Overall, with an understanding of extreme points, bowtie operations, modules, and their interplay within realizable order types, one can efficiently find partitions or compute canonical trees for given realizable chirotopes.

The method presented in this context primarily focuses on counting triangulations supported by a given set of points represented as a realizable order type through its associated canonical tree decomposition. While this approach is tailored towards triangulations due to its significance in computational geometry applications like planar graphs and geometric algorithms, it may not directly extend to other crossing-free structures without further adaptation.
However, with appropriate modifications and extensions of the concepts such as bowties, modules, and canonical trees to suit different types of crossing-free structures beyond triangulations (such as empty k-gons or other geometric configurations), it might be possible to count them efficiently using similar principles. This would involve defining new criteria for decompositions tailored specifically to those structures while leveraging existing methodologies from modular decomposition theory applied here.
In essence, while the current method excels at counting triangulations efficiently based on order types represented by canonical trees derived from mutual avoidance sets within point configurations; adapting these techniques could potentially enable efficient counting of other crossing-free structures with suitable adjustments.

The proportion of indecomposable abstract chirotopes compared to realizable ones remains an open question addressed partially in this study but not conclusively determined. The research indicates that among realizable order types represented by canonically decomposed trees using mutually avoiding subsets (modules), almost all tend towards being indecomposable - implying that most complex geometries are inherently indivisible into simpler components via standard modular decomposition methods.
For abstract chirotopes outside specific contexts like planar point sets where geometric considerations play crucial roles in defining their properties; determining an exact proportion of indecomposable instances compared to total cases poses challenges due to varied structural complexities across different scenarios. Further exploration focusing explicitly on abstract settings rather than concrete geometries could shed more light on this ratio between indecomposable abstract chirotopes versus their total counterparts.

0