toplogo
Sign In

Enhancing Question Answering Systems with Structured Lists: The LIST2QA Dataset and Intermediate Steps for Lists (ISL) Method


Core Concepts
This research paper introduces a novel dataset (LIST2QA) and method (ISL) to improve how question answering systems understand and utilize information presented in structured lists.
Abstract

Bibliographic Information:

Sung, M., Feng, S., Gung, J., Shu, R., Zhang, Y., & Mansour, S. (2024). Structured List-Grounded Question Answering. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.03950.

Research Objective:

This research aims to address the limitations of current document-grounded dialogue systems in effectively handling structured list data for question answering. The authors introduce a new dataset and method to improve the ability of QA systems to understand and leverage list information.

Methodology:

The authors developed LIST2QA, a dataset created from customer service documents containing various list types (conditions, steps, options, non-action information). They employed large language models (LLMs) for automated data creation, simulating user queries and system responses grounded in list information. Additionally, they propose the Intermediate Steps for Lists (ISL) method, which explicitly models structured list data and user contexts to enhance response generation. The researchers fine-tuned smaller LLMs (Flan-T5-XL and Mistral-7B-Instruct) on LIST2QA and compared their performance against larger LLMs (GPT-3.5 and Mixtral-8x7B-Instruct) using metrics like ROUGE-L, correctness, faithfulness, and completeness.

Key Findings:

  • Fine-tuned smaller LLMs with ISL significantly outperformed larger LLMs on the LIST2QA dataset.
  • Model-based filtering of training data significantly improved performance across various metrics.
  • The ISL method, which generates intermediate steps for list information, further enhanced performance, particularly for condition lists.
  • Flan-T5-XL with ISL demonstrated better generalizability to unseen domains compared to Mistral-7B-Instruct with ISL.

Main Conclusions:

This research highlights the importance of explicitly modeling structured list data and user contexts for improving question answering systems. The proposed LIST2QA dataset and ISL method provide valuable resources for advancing research in list-grounded question answering.

Significance:

This work significantly contributes to the field of natural language processing by addressing the under-explored area of list-grounded question answering. The proposed dataset and method can be valuable resources for developing more sophisticated and robust QA systems.

Limitations and Future Research:

The study acknowledges limitations in handling diverse logical relations beyond "and" and "or" in conditional lists and focuses on single-turn QA tasks. Future research could explore more complex logical relations, multi-turn dialogues, and develop more cost-effective and accurate evaluation methods for list-grounded question answering systems.

edit_icon

Customize Summary

edit_icon

Rewrite with AI

edit_icon

Generate Citations

translate_icon

Translate Source

visual_icon

Generate MindMap

visit_icon

Visit Source

Stats
Approximately 45% of passages in public policies in the UK comprise lists. Model-based filtering retained approximately 51.0% of the original samples. MTLD scores for LIST2QA: 69.9 for questions and 64.4 for answers. MTLD scores for ConditionalQA: 26.6 for questions and 10.1 for answers. Recall@3 of 93.0% on the training set using LlamaIndex with 'all-mpnet-base-v2' as the passage retriever. Cohen’s kappa score of 56.1 for inter-annotation agreement between human and model-based filtering. Flan-T5-XL with ISL shows increases of 3.1% in ROUGE-L, 4.6% in correctness, 4.5% in faithfulness, and 20.6% in completeness compared to baseline fine-tuning.
Quotes
"SOTA models such as GPT-3.5 (OpenAI, 2022) and Mixtral-8x7B (Jiang et al., 2024) show unsatisfactory performance on nuanced list information, as illustrated in Figure 1, despite their strong results on natural language inference (NLI) and reasoning tasks." "Our work aims to address these limitations while testing LLM capabilities for more nuanced list-based content." "By explicitly modeling structured list data and user contexts with ISL, our method outperforms baseline LLMs on the LIST2QA dataset."

Key Insights Distilled From

by Mujeen Sung,... at arxiv.org 10-08-2024

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2410.03950.pdf
Structured List-Grounded Question Answering

Deeper Inquiries

How can the LIST2QA dataset and ISL method be adapted to other domains beyond customer service documents, such as legal documents or scientific articles?

The LIST2QA dataset and ISL method demonstrate strong potential for adaptation to domains beyond customer service, such as legal documents or scientific articles. Here's how: Domain-Specific List Types and Relations: While LIST2QA focuses on conditions, steps, options, and non-action information, other domains may have unique list structures. For instance, legal documents might include lists of precedents, statutes, or elements of a claim. Adapting LIST2QA would involve identifying and annotating these domain-specific list types and their logical relations (e.g., "requires all of," "permits any of"). Specialized Language Models: Fine-tuning language models on domain-specific corpora is crucial. For legal documents, a model pre-trained on legal text would be more effective. Similarly, scientific articles require models familiar with scientific terminology and writing conventions. Enhanced Intermediate Steps: ISL can be tailored to capture domain-specific reasoning patterns. In legal documents, ISL could involve identifying relevant statutes, extracting key clauses, and determining their applicability to the user's scenario. For scientific articles, ISL might focus on identifying experimental procedures, results, and their implications. Data Augmentation Strategies: The pipeline for generating LIST2QA can be adapted. For legal documents, one could use existing legal case summaries to automatically generate user questions and system responses. In scientific articles, research abstracts could serve as a starting point for data augmentation. By incorporating these adaptations, the LIST2QA dataset and ISL method can be effectively applied to diverse domains, enhancing question answering capabilities in specialized fields.

Could incorporating user feedback during the question answering process further enhance the accuracy and completeness of responses based on list information?

Yes, incorporating user feedback during the question answering process can significantly enhance the accuracy and completeness of responses based on list information. Here's how: Identifying Ambiguities and Errors: Users can provide valuable feedback on whether the system correctly interpreted the list information, identified the relevant items, and applied the appropriate logical relations. This feedback helps in refining the model's understanding of nuanced semantics and improving its reasoning abilities. Clarifying User Intent: User feedback can help disambiguate user questions and ensure that the system is addressing the user's specific information needs. For example, if a user asks about eligibility criteria, feedback can clarify whether they are seeking a general overview or specific details related to their situation. Enhancing Response Completeness: Users can point out missing information or aspects of the list that the system overlooked. This feedback helps in training the model to generate more comprehensive and informative responses, ensuring that all relevant details are covered. Personalizing the QA Experience: By incorporating user preferences and feedback over time, the system can learn to tailor its responses to individual users, providing more personalized and relevant information. Integrating user feedback mechanisms, such as allowing users to rate responses, provide free-text feedback, or highlight specific parts of the response, can create a more interactive and effective question answering system.

What are the potential implications of developing highly accurate list-grounded question answering systems on information accessibility and decision-making processes in various fields?

Developing highly accurate list-grounded question answering systems has profound implications for information accessibility and decision-making processes across various fields: Democratizing Access to Complex Information: Such systems can make complex information, often locked away in dense documents with intricate lists, readily accessible to a wider audience. This is particularly impactful in fields like law, healthcare, and finance, where understanding eligibility criteria, regulations, or procedures is crucial. Improved Decision-Making: By providing accurate and comprehensive answers based on list information, these systems can empower individuals and organizations to make more informed decisions. For example, businesses can ensure compliance with regulations, patients can better understand treatment options, and citizens can navigate legal frameworks more effectively. Increased Efficiency and Productivity: Automating the process of extracting and synthesizing information from lists can significantly reduce the time and effort required for research and analysis. This allows professionals to focus on higher-level tasks, leading to increased efficiency and productivity. Personalized Information Delivery: List-grounded QA systems can be tailored to deliver personalized information based on user profiles and needs. This enables targeted information dissemination, ensuring that users receive the most relevant and actionable insights. Advancements in Legal and Scientific Research: In legal research, these systems can aid in identifying relevant precedents and analyzing case law more efficiently. In scientific research, they can accelerate literature reviews and facilitate the discovery of new knowledge from experimental data. However, it's crucial to consider potential ethical implications, such as biases in training data and the potential for misuse. Ensuring fairness, transparency, and responsible use are paramount as we develop and deploy these powerful technologies.
0
star