Core Concepts
The proposed haptic bilateral teleoperation system features a virtualized force feedback based on the motion error generated by an admittance-controlled robot, enabling decoupling of the force rendering system from the control of the interaction. Additionally, it embeds a saturation strategy of the motion references to limit the forces exerted by the robot on the environment, ensuring safe interaction.
Abstract
The paper presents a novel haptic bilateral teleoperation system (HBTS) that aims to improve the execution of precision interaction tasks by addressing the challenges of attaining a natural, stable, and safe haptic human-robot interaction.
The key aspects of the proposed HBTS are:
Compliant behavior of the robot: The robot is subject to admittance control, allowing it to behave compliantly with the remote environment. This is achieved both explicitly through the admittance control, and implicitly by rendering the interaction forces on the haptic device, allowing the human operator to react to them.
Interaction force limitation: To ensure safe interaction, the system embeds a saturation strategy of the motion references provided to the admittance-controlled robot. This limits the interaction forces between the robot and the environment.
Virtualized force feedback: Despite the presence of a force/torque sensor, the force feedback is virtualized through the motion error generated by the admittance control, which is input to a virtual spring-damper system. This approach decouples the force rendering system from the control of the interaction, allowing the rendering of forces with desired dynamics.
The authors validate the proposed HBTS against two other architectures, including one based on force/torque sensor measurement-based force feedback, through a teleoperated blackboard writing experiment. The results indicate that the proposed HBTS improves the naturalness of teleoperation, as well as the safety and accuracy of the interaction.
Stats
The mean difference (MD) between the human and robot forces exerted during the blackboard writing task was:
Scenario A (force/torque measurement-based feedback): MD = 48.32 N
Scenario B (virtualized feedback without references saturation): MD = 54.88 N
Scenario C (proposed HBTS with virtualized feedback and references saturation): MD = 1.40 N
The absolute difference between the maximum values of the human and robot forces was:
Scenario A: ∆f^Re_e,z = 80.40 N
Scenario B: ∆f^Re_e,z = 137.21 N
Scenario C: ∆f^Re_e,z = 14.22 N