Path Integral Control for Hybrid Dynamical Systems with Deterministic Transitions Under Uncertainties

Core Concepts

This paper introduces a novel approach, the Hybrid Path Integral (H-PI) framework, to solve optimal control problems for hybrid dynamical systems under uncertainties, leveraging the duality between stochastic control and path distribution control.

Abstract

Bibliographic Information:

Yu, H., Franco, D. F., Johnson, A. M., & Chen, Y. (2024). Path Integral Control for Hybrid Dynamical Systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.00659.

Research Objective:

This paper addresses the challenge of designing optimal controllers for hybrid dynamical systems, which combine continuous and discrete dynamics, in the presence of uncertainties. The authors aim to develop a method that can handle the complexities introduced by discontinuous jump dynamics, mode changes, and noise, which are common in robotic systems with contact.

Methodology:

The researchers propose the Hybrid Path Integral (H-PI) framework, which leverages the duality between stochastic control and path distribution control. They demonstrate that Girsanov's theorem, used for changing probability measures in stochastic processes, can be extended to hybrid systems with deterministic transitions. This allows them to formulate the stochastic optimal control problem as a hybrid distribution control problem. The optimal controller is then obtained by evaluating a path integral over stochastic trajectories with hybrid transitions. To improve sampling efficiency, the authors employ importance sampling using a Hybrid iterative-Linear-Quadratic-Regulator (H-iLQR) controller as a proposal distribution.

Key Findings:

• The paper proves that Girsanov's theorem holds for hybrid path distributions, enabling the application of path integral control to hybrid systems.
• The authors show that the optimal controller for a hybrid system with stochastic smooth flows and deterministic transitions can be expressed as a path integral over stochastic trajectories.
• The proposed H-PI framework, using H-iLQR as a proposal distribution, effectively solves the stochastic optimal control problem for hybrid systems, as demonstrated through numerical experiments on bouncing ball and spring-loaded inverted pendulum (SLIP) models.

Main Conclusions:

The H-PI framework provides a novel and effective method for designing optimal controllers for hybrid dynamical systems under uncertainties. This approach overcomes limitations of existing methods by directly handling hybrid transitions and avoiding linearization errors. The use of H-iLQR as a proposal distribution significantly improves sampling efficiency.

Significance:

This research significantly contributes to the field of robotics by providing a principled and practical approach for controlling complex systems with contact, such as walking, running, and manipulation robots. The H-PI framework has the potential to enable more robust and efficient control strategies for these systems in real-world environments.

Limitations and Future Research:

The current work focuses on hybrid systems with deterministic transitions. Future research could explore extending the H-PI framework to handle stochastic hybrid transitions, where the jump conditions themselves are subject to uncertainties. Additionally, investigating the application of H-PI to higher-dimensional and more complex robotic systems would be valuable.

Stats

Quotes

Key Insights Distilled From

Path Integral Control for Hybrid Dynamical Systems

by Hongzhe Yu, ... at arxiv.org 11-04-2024

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2411.00659.pdf

Deeper Inquiries

How can the H-PI framework be extended to handle more complex scenarios, such as systems with stochastic hybrid transitions or systems with partial state observation?

The H-PI framework, while powerful for a range of hybrid systems, does assume deterministic guard conditions and reset maps. Extending it to encompass more complex scenarios, such as stochastic hybrid transitions or partial state observation, necessitates careful consideration and modifications:
1. Stochastic Hybrid Transitions:

Modeling: Instead of deterministic guard functions (g(x) ≤ 0), we'd model transitions probabilistically. This could involve defining a probability density function over the state space, representing the likelihood of a transition at a given state.
Path Integral Formulation: The ratio of path distributions (Lemma 1) would need to incorporate these transition probabilities. This might involve stochastic integrals or alternative representations of the transition dynamics.
Sampling: Sampling trajectories would become more involved. Instead of checking for deterministic guard conditions, we'd sample transition times and states based on the defined probability distributions.
2. Partial State Observation:

Belief Space Formulation: Instead of directly controlling the system state, we'd operate in the belief space. The belief represents the probability distribution over the system's true state, given the available observations.
Stochastic Dynamics Augmentation: The system dynamics would be augmented to include the evolution of the belief. This typically involves techniques like Kalman filtering (for linear systems) or more sophisticated Bayesian filtering methods (for nonlinear systems).
Reward Function: The reward function in the path integral would need to be defined over the belief space, reflecting the control objectives in terms of the estimated state.
Challenges and Considerations:

Increased Complexity: Incorporating stochastic transitions or partial observability significantly increases the complexity of the path integral formulation and the sampling process.
Computational Cost: Evaluating the path integral, especially in high-dimensional belief spaces, can become computationally expensive. Efficient approximation techniques would be crucial.
Theoretical Guarantees: Extending the theoretical guarantees of H-PI (e.g., convergence, optimality) to these more complex settings would require further analysis.

Could alternative proposal distributions, other than H-iLQR, be used within the H-PI framework to potentially further improve sampling efficiency or address specific challenges of certain hybrid systems?

Absolutely! The choice of the proposal distribution in H-PI is flexible, and while H-iLQR offers a good starting point, exploring alternatives can be beneficial for improving sampling efficiency or handling specific system characteristics:
1. Alternative Proposal Distributions:

Guided Policy Search (GPS): GPS methods learn parameterized policies (e.g., neural networks) to guide the sampling process. This can be particularly effective for high-dimensional systems or when learning complex, non-linear control strategies.
Differential Variational Inference (DVI): DVI methods optimize a variational distribution over trajectories to minimize the KL-divergence with the optimal distribution. This can provide a more principled approach to proposal distribution optimization.
Sampling-Based Motion Planning: Techniques like Probabilistic Roadmaps (PRMs) or Rapidly-exploring Random Trees (RRTs) could be adapted to provide a proposal distribution biased towards feasible trajectories in environments with obstacles or kinematic constraints.
2. Tailoring to Specific Challenges:

Discontinuous Dynamics: For systems with highly discontinuous dynamics, where H-iLQR might struggle due to linearization errors, using a proposal distribution that explicitly accounts for these discontinuities could be advantageous.
Multi-Modal Systems: If the hybrid system exhibits distinct modes of operation, a mixture of proposal distributions, each tailored to a specific mode, could improve sampling efficiency.
Constraints: Incorporating constraints (e.g., state constraints, input saturation) directly into the proposal distribution can guide the sampling process towards feasible regions of the state-action space.
Considerations for Choosing a Proposal Distribution:

System Dynamics: The complexity and specific characteristics of the hybrid system's dynamics should guide the choice.
Computational Cost: The computational cost of generating samples from the proposal distribution should be manageable.
Exploration-Exploitation Trade-off: The proposal distribution should balance exploration of the state-action space with exploitation of promising regions.

The paper focuses on robotics applications. What other domains could benefit from the H-PI framework for controlling hybrid dynamical systems under uncertainties?

While the paper highlights robotics, the H-PI framework's applicability extends far beyond, offering potential benefits in diverse domains grappling with hybrid dynamics and uncertainty:
1. Systems Biology and Healthcare:

Drug Delivery: Modeling drug concentration in the bloodstream, with transitions representing dosage intake or metabolic processes. H-PI could optimize drug delivery schedules while considering uncertainties in absorption rates.
Epidemic Control: Modeling the spread of infectious diseases, with transitions representing interventions like vaccination or quarantine. H-PI could guide optimal control policies under uncertainties in disease parameters.
2. Energy Systems and Smart Grids:

Power Electronics: Controlling DC-DC converters, which exhibit hybrid dynamics due to switching elements. H-PI could optimize switching strategies for efficient energy conversion under uncertainties in load conditions.
Microgrid Management: Coordinating distributed energy resources (solar, wind, storage) with transitions representing grid-connected or islanded modes. H-PI could enable robust control strategies under renewable energy fluctuations.
3. Manufacturing and Process Control:

Hybrid Manufacturing Processes: Optimizing processes involving both discrete (e.g., material deposition) and continuous (e.g., heat treatment) operations. H-PI could handle uncertainties in material properties or process parameters.
Supply Chain Management: Modeling inventory levels with transitions representing production runs or demand fluctuations. H-PI could optimize production and distribution strategies under uncertain demand.
4. Finance and Economics:

Algorithmic Trading: Developing trading strategies with transitions representing market regime changes or order execution events. H-PI could handle uncertainties in market dynamics and optimize trading decisions.
Macroeconomic Modeling: Modeling economic systems with transitions representing policy changes or financial crises. H-PI could provide insights into optimal policy interventions under economic uncertainties.