Core Concepts
Technical writers can help engineers overcome their fear of writing by providing supportive review processes, offering writing assistance, and addressing biases in the review process.
Abstract
The article discusses the common causes of "writing anxiety" or "writing apprehension" that many engineers experience, and how technical writers can help overcome these challenges.
The key points are:
Language is subjective and ever-evolving, and there is no truly "correct" way to write, which can cause stress and fear of making mistakes for engineers.
Common causes of writing anxiety include: previous bad experiences with harsh critiques, limited resources (time, energy, support), conflicting priorities, fear of judgment from coworkers, and lack of clear content to write.
Additional causes include lack of confidence in written language, especially for non-native English speakers, and fear of discriminatory critiques, especially for marginalized people.
To help non-native English speakers, the article suggests:
Explaining why you're confused about something and describing your expectations
Asking them to explain content verbally and transcribing it
Providing templates and examples to reduce the need for formatting
To address bias in the review process, the article recommends relying on resources that discuss unlearning racism and bias in technical writing, as well as expanding one's cultural literacy beyond just technical expertise.
Overall, the article emphasizes the need for technical writers to create a supportive, non-judgmental environment to help engineers overcome their writing anxiety and improve collaboration.
Stats
"Writing is not only subjective and ever-evolving, it's also judged based on further subjective rulesets. By its nature, language can never be truly correct. There is no right or wrong answer."
"Overly harsh critiques or demands make writing joyless. Limited resources like time and energy, especially during a hectic product cycle, don't allow an engineer to sit down and consider what they've made."
"Many speak and write English 'better' than native English speakers. In the context of these suggestions, I'm focusing on non-native English speakers who do not write professionally."
Quotes
"[D]o not make assumptions about the quality of a paper based on the authors' names and affiliations."
"You are a reviewer — not an editor. Focus on the research. If the English is so poor you cannot review the paper or provide feedback on the science, tell the editor so that they can decide how to proceed."
"If the paper is not written in sound English, it is OK to correct grammatical errors and help improve the writing. But remember that you are not a martyr or the savior of people who did not grow up speaking English. Be kind."