Efficient Method for Studying Cross-Lingual Transfer in Multilingual Language Models

Concetti Chiave

The capacity and effectiveness of pre-trained multilingual models (MLMs) for zero-shot cross-lingual transfer is well established, but the phenomena of positive or negative transfer and the effect of language choice still need to be fully understood, especially in the complex setting of massively multilingual LMs. This work proposes an efficient method to study transfer language influence in zero-shot performance on another target language.

Sintesi

The authors propose an efficient method to study cross-lingual transfer in multilingual language models (MLMs). Unlike previous work, their approach disentangles downstream tasks from language, using dedicated adapter units.

The key highlights are:

• The authors find that some languages do not largely affect others, while some languages, especially ones unseen during pre-training, can be extremely beneficial or detrimental for different target languages.
• They observe that no transfer language is beneficial for all target languages, but languages previously unseen by MLMs consistently benefit from transfer from almost any language.
• The authors use their modular approach to quantify negative interference efficiently and categorize languages accordingly.
• They provide a list of promising transfer-target language configurations that consistently lead to target language performance improvements.

The authors conduct extensive analysis using this efficient approach on five downstream tasks using dozens of transfer and target languages (184 in total). They focus their analysis on cross-lingual transfer for languages unseen during the pre-training of the MLM.

Statistiche

The authors use 38 transfer languages, 11 of which are unseen by mBERT during pretraining.
The authors train task adapters on datasets such as Universal Dependencies v2.11 for dependency parsing and POS tagging, Wikiann for NER, and XNLI and AmericasNLI for natural language inference.

Citazioni

"The capacity and effectiveness of pre-trained multilingual models (MLMs) for zero-shot cross-lingual transfer is well established. However, phenomena of positive or negative transfer, and the effect of language choice still need to be fully understood, especially in the complex setting of massively multilingual LMs."
"We find that no transfer language is beneficial for all target languages. We do, curiously, observe languages previously unseen by MLMs consistently benefit from transfer from almost any language."

Approfondimenti chiave tratti da

An Efficient Approach for Studying Cross-Lingual Transfer in Multilingual Language Models

by Fahim Faisal... alle arxiv.org 04-01-2024

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2403.20088.pdf

Domande più approfondite

How would the findings change if the authors used a different base multilingual model, such as XLM-R, instead of mBERT

If the authors used a different base multilingual model like XLM-R instead of mBERT, the findings could potentially change due to the differences in the architecture and training of the models. XLM-R is known to have better performance in certain tasks compared to mBERT, so the transfer performance of unseen languages might show different patterns. XLM-R might exhibit different levels of positive or negative transfer for various target languages, and the ranking of transfer languages based on their effectiveness could also differ. Additionally, the behavior of target languages in receiving positive transfer from transfer languages might vary with XLM-R as the base model.

What are the potential reasons behind the high variance in transfer performance observed for unseen languages

The high variance in transfer performance observed for unseen languages could be attributed to several factors:

Linguistic Diversity: Unseen languages may vary significantly in linguistic features, making it challenging for the model to adapt uniformly to all of them.
Data Quality: The quality and quantity of training data available for unseen languages could vary, leading to different levels of model adaptation.
Model Capacity: The capacity of the base model to capture the linguistic nuances of unseen languages may vary, resulting in varying levels of transfer performance.
Language Relatedness: The relatedness of unseen languages to the languages seen during pretraining could impact transfer performance, with more related languages showing less variance.
Fine-Tuning Strategy: The fine-tuning strategy employed for unseen languages, such as the number of steps or the adaptation techniques used, could also contribute to the variance in transfer performance.

How can the insights from this study be leveraged to develop more effective cross-lingual transfer learning techniques for low-resource languages

The insights from this study can be leveraged to develop more effective cross-lingual transfer learning techniques for low-resource languages in the following ways:

Optimized Transfer Language Selection: By identifying the characteristics of effective transfer languages and target languages, a more strategic selection of languages for transfer learning can be made to maximize performance.
Adaptive Fine-Tuning Strategies: Understanding the impact of different fine-tuning strategies on transfer performance can help in developing adaptive fine-tuning approaches tailored to specific language pairs or tasks.
Enhanced Model Adaptation: Leveraging the findings on the behavior of unseen languages can guide the development of specialized adaptation techniques to improve model adaptation to new languages.
Robust Evaluation Metrics: Developing robust evaluation metrics based on the insights from the study can help in accurately assessing the effectiveness of cross-lingual transfer techniques for low-resource languages.
Multilingual Model Design: Incorporating the observed patterns of transfer performance into the design of multilingual models can lead to models that are more effective in handling diverse language interactions and transfer scenarios.