toplogo
Accedi
approfondimento - Machine Learning - # Transfer Learning for Image-to-Graph Transformers

Cross-domain and Cross-dimension Learning for Image-to-Graph Transformers


Concetti Chiave
The author introduces methods for cross-domain and cross-dimension transfer learning for image-to-graph transformers, demonstrating superior performance in various domains.
Sintesi

The content discusses the challenges of direct image-to-graph transformation, proposing innovative methods to enable transfer learning across different domains and dimensions. The approach involves regularized edge sampling loss, domain adaptation frameworks, and a projection function for pretraining 3D transformers on 2D input data. Extensive experiments validate the utility of these methods in improving image-to-graph synthesis on diverse datasets.

The work addresses the limitations of traditional multi-stage graph extraction approaches by leveraging vision transformers for direct image-to-graph inference. By adopting concepts from inductive Transfer Learning (TL), the study demonstrates significant improvements in object detection and relationship prediction tasks. The proposed framework enables knowledge transfer between vastly different domains in 2D and 3D scenarios.

Key highlights include the introduction of a novel edge sampling loss to regulate relationship prediction, supervised domain adaptation frameworks aligning features from different domains, and a simple projection function facilitating 2D to 3D pretraining. Results show substantial performance gains over baselines across multiple benchmark datasets capturing physical networks.

edit_icon

Personalizza riepilogo

edit_icon

Riscrivi con l'IA

edit_icon

Genera citazioni

translate_icon

Traduci origine

visual_icon

Genera mappa mentale

visit_icon

Visita l'originale

Statistiche
Due to the complexity of this task, large training datasets are rare in many domains. Our method consistently outperforms a series of baselines on challenging benchmarks. We demonstrate our method's utility in cross-domain and cross-dimension experiments. Our method leads to compelling improvements in image-to-graph synthesis on existing datasets. Our method bridges dimensions in pretraining by solving direct image-to-graph inference for complex 3D vessel images.
Citazioni
"We introduce a set of methods enabling cross-domain and cross-dimension transfer learning for image-to-graph transformers." "Our method consistently outperforms a series of baselines on challenging benchmarks." "Our framework introduces a projection function from the source representation to a space similar to the target domain."

Approfondimenti chiave tratti da

by Alexander H.... alle arxiv.org 03-12-2024

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2403.06601.pdf
Cross-domain and Cross-dimension Learning for Image-to-Graph  Transformers

Domande più approfondite

How can this framework be extended to address individual edge and node importance?

In order to address individual edge and node importance within the framework, one approach could involve incorporating a weighting mechanism based on the significance of each edge and node in the graph representation. This could be achieved by assigning weights or scores to edges and nodes based on their relevance or importance in capturing the underlying structure of the physical network. These weights can then be used during training to emphasize the contribution of more critical edges and nodes in the optimization process. Additionally, techniques such as attention mechanisms within transformer models can also be leveraged to dynamically adjust the focus on different edges and nodes based on their importance. By allowing the model to learn attention weights for each edge-node pair, it can adaptively prioritize information from key elements in the graph representation. By extending the framework with these mechanisms for addressing individual edge and node importance, it would enable more nuanced representations that capture not only structural connectivity but also highlight specific elements crucial for downstream tasks.

What are potential limitations when applying this methodology to other research questions on physical graph representations?

When applying this methodology to other research questions on physical graph representations, several limitations may arise: Data Availability: The effectiveness of transfer learning heavily relies on having access to large annotated datasets in both source and target domains. If suitable datasets are not available for pretraining or fine-tuning, it may limit the applicability of this methodology. Domain Shifts: Significant differences between source and target domains can pose challenges for effective knowledge transfer. Adapting models across diverse domains with substantial variations in features like topology, scale, or noise levels may require additional strategies beyond standard transfer learning techniques. Model Generalization: While transformers have shown promise in various applications, including image-to-graph transformations, ensuring generalizability across different types of physical networks with varying characteristics remains a challenge. Fine-tuning models extensively for specific tasks might limit their adaptability to new scenarios. Interpretability: Transformer-based models often exhibit complex internal workings that make interpretation challenging. Understanding how decisions are made at an individual edge or node level within these models can be intricate due to their inherent black-box nature. Addressing these limitations will be crucial when applying this methodology to diverse research questions involving physical graph representations.

How can topological priors be incorporated into the optimization problem to enhance performance further?

To incorporate topological priors into the optimization problem within this framework, one strategy is through regularization techniques that enforce known structural constraints during training: Graph Constraints: Introducing constraints related to known properties of graphs (e.g., connectivity patterns) as regularization terms in loss functions can guide model predictions towards solutions consistent with expected topologies. Topology-aware Loss Functions: Designing loss functions that penalize deviations from expected topological structures (e.g., enforcing acyclicity) ensures that predicted graphs adhere closely to real-world network configurations. 3Attention Mechanisms: Modifying attention mechanisms within transformers by incorporating prior knowledge about important nodes/edges allows focusing model attention where it matters most according... By integrating topological priors effectively into model training processes through regularization methods tailored specifically for preserving desired structural characteristics...
0
star