통찰 - Computer Networks - # Spatial Barriers to Social Ties

Urban Highways Reduce Social Connectivity in US Cities

Q: How do the barrier effects of highways vary across different types of social ties (e.g., strong vs. weak ties, family vs. friends)?

The barrier effects of highways can vary across different types of social ties based on the strength and nature of the relationships. Strong ties, such as close friendships or family connections, may be more resilient to the physical barrier imposed by highways. These ties are often characterized by frequent and deep interactions, which can withstand the challenges posed by highways. In contrast, weak ties, such as casual acquaintances or distant connections, may be more susceptible to the barrier effects of highways. These ties rely more on incidental or occasional interactions, which can be disrupted by physical barriers like highways. Furthermore, the type of social tie, whether it's between family members, friends, colleagues, or acquaintances, can also influence how the barrier effects manifest. Family ties, which are often deeply rooted and essential for social support, may find ways to overcome highway barriers through intentional efforts to maintain connections. On the other hand, friendships or professional relationships that rely on frequent face-to-face interactions may face more challenges in maintaining their strength and frequency of contact when separated by highways. Understanding the nuances of different types of social ties is crucial in assessing the impact of highway barriers on social connectivity and designing interventions to mitigate these effects.

핵심 개념

Urban highways are associated with decreased social connectivity, especially at short distances, across the 50 largest US metropolitan areas.

초록

The study analyzes the relationship between urban highways and social ties in the 50 largest US metropolitan areas. It introduces a "Barrier Score" that quantifies the reduction in social ties crossing highways compared to a null model that rewires ties without considering highway locations.

The key findings are:

The Barrier Scores are consistently positive across all 50 cities, indicating that highways are associated with fewer social connections.
The barrier effect is strongest for short-distance social ties, peaking at around 1-5 km in most cities.
Regression models show that the Barrier Score increases with longer highway length, lower population fragmentation by highways, and lower population density.
Fine-grained models at the census tract level confirm that the number of highways separating tracts is negatively correlated with the number of social ties between them, even after controlling for distance, income differences, and racial composition.
Historical case studies of highways associated with racial segregation show that these highways also display high Barrier Scores, suggesting long-lasting impacts of infrastructure on social connectivity.

The study provides quantitative evidence that urban highways act as barriers to social ties, especially at local scales, and that this effect is consistent with the historical role of highways in exacerbating racial segregation in US cities.

요약 맞춤 설정

AI로 다시 쓰기

인용 생성

소스 번역

다른 언어로

마인드맵 생성

소스 콘텐츠 기반

소스 방문

arxiv.org

통계

"Highways are associated with decreased social connectivity, especially at short distances."
"The Barrier Score increases with longer highway length, lower population fragmentation by highways, and lower population density."
"The number of highways separating census tracts is negatively correlated with the number of social ties between them."

인용구

"Urban highways are associated with decreased social connectivity, especially at short distances, across the 50 largest US metropolitan areas."
"Highways that are historically associated with racial segregation also display high Barrier Scores, suggesting long-lasting impacts of infrastructure on social connectivity."
"The study provides quantitative evidence that urban highways act as barriers to social ties, especially at local scales."

핵심 통찰 요약

Urban highways are barriers to social ties

by Luca... 게시일 arxiv.org 04-18-2024

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2404.11596.pdf

Urban highways are barriers to social ties

더 깊은 질문

How do the barrier effects of highways vary across different types of social ties (e.g., strong vs. weak ties, family vs. friends)?

The barrier effects of highways can vary across different types of social ties based on the strength and nature of the relationships. Strong ties, such as close friendships or family connections, may be more resilient to the physical barrier imposed by highways. These ties are often characterized by frequent and deep interactions, which can withstand the challenges posed by highways. In contrast, weak ties, such as casual acquaintances or distant connections, may be more susceptible to the barrier effects of highways. These ties rely more on incidental or occasional interactions, which can be disrupted by physical barriers like highways.
Furthermore, the type of social tie, whether it's between family members, friends, colleagues, or acquaintances, can also influence how the barrier effects manifest. Family ties, which are often deeply rooted and essential for social support, may find ways to overcome highway barriers through intentional efforts to maintain connections. On the other hand, friendships or professional relationships that rely on frequent face-to-face interactions may face more challenges in maintaining their strength and frequency of contact when separated by highways.
Understanding the nuances of different types of social ties is crucial in assessing the impact of highway barriers on social connectivity and designing interventions to mitigate these effects.

How can targeted infrastructure changes (e.g., highway removal, pedestrian bridges) help mitigate the barrier effects and reconnect divided communities?

Targeted infrastructure changes, such as highway removal or the construction of pedestrian bridges, can play a significant role in mitigating the barrier effects of highways and reconnecting divided communities. Here are some ways in which these interventions can be effective:

Highway Removal: Removing highways that act as physical barriers can directly eliminate the obstacle to social connectivity. By restoring the urban fabric and reconnecting previously divided neighborhoods, highway removal can promote easier access and interaction between communities.

Pedestrian Bridges: Constructing pedestrian bridges over highways can provide safe and convenient pathways for pedestrians and cyclists to cross, overcoming the physical barrier. These bridges enhance mobility, encourage active transportation, and facilitate social interactions between residents on either side of the highway.

Urban Green Spaces: Transforming highway corridors into urban green spaces or linear parks can create shared community areas that promote social gatherings, recreational activities, and a sense of belonging. These green spaces can serve as meeting points for residents from different neighborhoods, fostering social connections.

Mixed-Use Development: Introducing mixed-use developments near highway corridors can attract diverse populations and create vibrant hubs where people live, work, and socialize. By diversifying the urban landscape, these developments can encourage social mixing and integration across previously divided areas.

Community Engagement: Involving local residents in the planning and implementation of infrastructure changes is crucial. Community input can ensure that interventions address specific social needs, preferences, and concerns, fostering a sense of ownership and collective responsibility for reconnecting communities.

By strategically implementing targeted infrastructure changes that prioritize social connectivity and community well-being, cities can effectively mitigate the barrier effects of highways and promote a more inclusive and cohesive urban environment.

What other types of urban infrastructure (e.g., railways, canals) may also act as barriers to social connectivity, and how do their effects compare to those of highways?

Various types of urban infrastructure, such as railways, canals, and major roads, can also act as barriers to social connectivity, albeit in different ways compared to highways. Here's how these infrastructures may impact social ties:

Railways: Similar to highways, railways can create physical barriers that disrupt the flow of pedestrian and vehicular traffic, leading to spatial fragmentation and reduced social connectivity. However, railways often have designated crossing points and may not be as wide or continuous as highways, allowing for easier navigation and potential integration into the urban fabric.

Canals: Canals, especially when combined with limited crossing points or lack of pedestrian infrastructure, can create significant barriers to social connectivity. They may divide neighborhoods and restrict movement, impacting social interactions and community cohesion. However, canals can also offer opportunities for waterfront development and recreational spaces that enhance social engagement in certain contexts.

Major Roads: While not as extensive as highways, major roads within urban areas can still pose barriers to social connectivity, particularly when they lack pedestrian-friendly infrastructure or safe crossing points. These roads can fragment neighborhoods, limit access to amenities, and deter social interactions, especially for vulnerable populations like pedestrians and cyclists.

In comparison to highways, railways, canals, and major roads may have varying degrees of impact on social connectivity based on factors such as width, design, accessibility, and surrounding land use. Each type of infrastructure presents unique challenges and opportunities for urban planning and design to address the barrier effects and promote social integration. By considering the specific characteristics and context of different urban infrastructures, cities can implement tailored strategies to enhance social connectivity and create more inclusive and cohesive communities.