Transforming Yablo's Paradox into Theorems in Linear Temporal Logic

핵심 개념

Yablo's paradox, which avoids self-reference, can be transformed into genuine mathematical theorems in Linear Temporal Logic by showing that certain operators do not have fixed-points in this logic.

초록

The paper presents a formal treatment of Yablo's paradox in the framework of Linear Temporal Logic (LTL). The authors show that Yablo's paradox, which was designed to avoid self-reference, can be transformed into genuine mathematical theorems in LTL.

Key highlights:

• Yablo's paradox can be formalized in LTL as a fixed-point equation involving the "next" and "always" temporal operators.
• The authors prove that the operator x → #2¬x (which corresponds to the original Yablo paradox) does not have any fixed-points in LTL, making this a valid theorem.
• They also prove that the operators x → ¬2x and x → 2¬x do not have any fixed-points in LTL.
• The authors extend this approach to other versions of Yablo's paradox, such as the "sometimes", "almost always", and "infinitely often" variants, and derive corresponding theorems in LTL.
• The proofs follow the same logical structure as Yablo's original paradox, but are formalized within the LTL framework.

통계

None.

인용구

None.

핵심 통찰 요약

Theoremizing Yablo's Paradox

by Ahmad Karimi... 게시일 arxiv.org 04-17-2024

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.0134.pdf

더 깊은 질문

How can the insights from transforming Yablo's paradox into LTL theorems be applied to other paradoxes or logical puzzles

The insights gained from transforming Yablo's paradox into theorems in Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) can be applied to other paradoxes or logical puzzles by showcasing the power of formalization and logical reasoning in resolving seemingly contradictory statements. By converting paradoxes into theorems within a formal system like LTL, we can demonstrate the underlying structure and consistency of these puzzles. This process allows us to analyze the paradoxes in a systematic and rigorous manner, potentially leading to new insights and solutions. Additionally, by translating paradoxes into different logical frameworks, we can explore alternative perspectives and approaches to understanding complex problems in philosophy and mathematics.

What are the implications of the non-existence of fixed-points for certain temporal operators in LTL

The non-existence of fixed-points for certain temporal operators in LTL has significant implications for the expressive power and limitations of the logic. Fixed-points play a crucial role in understanding the behavior and properties of operators within a logical system. The absence of fixed-points for specific operators indicates that these operators do not have solutions that remain unchanged under their application. This lack of stability can affect the predictability and consistency of the logic, highlighting the complexity and intricacies of temporal reasoning. It suggests that certain temporal properties or patterns cannot be captured or represented by these operators, revealing the boundaries of what can be effectively expressed within the framework of LTL. This limitation prompts further exploration into the design and capabilities of temporal logics to address more nuanced temporal phenomena.

How does this relate to the expressive power and limitations of the logic

There are several other paradoxes or logical constructs that could potentially be "theoremized" by translating them into different formal systems or logics. For example, the Liar paradox, Russell's paradox, or the Surprise Examination paradox could be reinterpreted and formalized in alternative logical frameworks to derive new theorems or insights. By applying the methodology used in transforming Yablo's paradox into LTL theorems, we can analyze these paradoxes from a fresh perspective and uncover hidden structures or patterns within them. This process not only aids in resolving the paradoxes but also contributes to the development of novel theorems and solutions in logic and philosophy. It demonstrates the versatility and adaptability of formal systems in handling complex and puzzling concepts, paving the way for innovative approaches to longstanding problems in the field.