Główne pojęcia
Design education perpetuates ableist and exclusionary practices, necessitating a shift towards inclusivity and care.
Streszczenie
This article explores the ableist and exclusionary practices prevalent in design education. It presents case studies of redesigning courses to accommodate students with disabilities. The authors advocate for a pedagogy of care to center inclusivity in design classrooms.
1. Introduction
- Critique of traditional design pedagogies.
- Call for inclusivity and diversity in design education.
2. Ableist and Exclusionary Practices
- Focus on inequities perpetuated by design education.
- Critique of research focus on WEIRD users.
- Emphasis on decolonial design and participatory co-design.
3. Methods
- Autoethnographic approach based on teaching experiences.
- Reflections on course adaptations for inclusivity.
4. Case Study 1
- Implementation of HyFlex model for accessibility.
- Successes in accommodating diverse student needs.
5. Case Study 2
- Challenges faced by BLV students in visual-centric courses.
- Adaptations made to enhance accessibility.
6. Case Study 3
- Addressing structural barriers in course design.
- Importance of inclusive practices for all students.
7. Towards a Pedagogy of Care
- Advocacy for HyFlex models in design studios.
- Offering non-visual participation options.
- Seeking institutional support for sustainable inclusivity.
Conclusion & References
Further discussions on inclusive practices and references supporting the need for a pedagogy of care in design education.
Cytaty
"Disability scholars have critiqued pedagogical norms and have proposed pedagogies of care."
"A sustainable pedagogy of care cannot simply focus on students but also demonstrate empathy towards instructors."