The authors consider a setting where a supplier needs to allocate limited divisible resources among self-interested agents without the use of payments. They aim to design a mechanism that maximizes social welfare, as measured by Nash Social Welfare (NSW), while ensuring approximate incentive compatibility (IC) - i.e., minimizing the maximum utility gain agents can obtain by misreporting their preferences.
The key contributions are:
They propose a novel neural network architecture called ExS-Net that simulates "money-burning" (intentional withholding of resources) to align agents' incentives with the supplier's objective of maximizing NSW.
They provide generalization bounds for the ExS-Net mechanism, showing that the empirical objective converges to the true objective as the training dataset size increases.
Extensive experiments demonstrate that ExS-Net significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art hand-designed mechanisms, Proportional Fairness (PF) and Partial Allocation (PA), in terms of achieving a superior trade-off between NSW and exploitability (a measure of approximate IC).
They show that ExS-Net is robust to distribution mismatch between the training and test data, maintaining good performance even when the training data contains untruthful agent reports.
Para outro idioma
do conteúdo fonte
arxiv.org
Principais Insights Extraídos De
by Sihan Zeng,S... às arxiv.org 04-16-2024
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.10927.pdfPerguntas Mais Profundas