аналитика - Algorithms and Data Structures - # Stochastic Data-Driven Predictive Control

Stochastic Data-Driven Predictive Control with Equivalent Performance to Stochastic Model Predictive Control

Q: How can the proposed data-driven method be extended to handle non-Gaussian noise distributions?

The proposed data-driven method can be extended to handle non-Gaussian noise distributions by incorporating techniques that allow for the modeling of arbitrary noise characteristics. One approach is to utilize Polynomial Chaos Expansion (PCE), which enables the representation of non-Gaussian random variables through a series of orthogonal polynomials. By applying PCE, the data-driven framework can capture the statistical properties of the noise, allowing for a more accurate representation of the system dynamics under non-Gaussian disturbances. Additionally, the framework could integrate distributionally robust optimization techniques, which focus on optimizing performance against the worst-case scenarios within a specified set of distributions. This would involve formulating the control problem to account for the uncertainty in the noise distribution, ensuring that the control policies remain effective even when the actual noise deviates from the assumed Gaussian model. Moreover, the use of robust statistics could be beneficial. By employing robust estimators that are less sensitive to outliers and deviations from the assumed distribution, the data-driven method can maintain performance in the presence of non-Gaussian noise. This adaptation would require modifications to the estimation and control algorithms to ensure that they can effectively handle the complexities introduced by non-Gaussian noise distributions.

Q: What are the potential challenges and limitations of the data-driven approach compared to the model-based SMPC method?

The data-driven approach, while promising, faces several challenges and limitations compared to the model-based Stochastic Model Predictive Control (SMPC) method. Data Requirements: The data-driven method relies heavily on the availability of high-quality, rich input-output data to accurately capture the system dynamics. In contrast, model-based SMPC can leverage known system models, which may not require extensive data collection. Insufficient or poor-quality data can lead to inaccurate control policies and degraded performance. Robustness to Noise: While the data-driven method aims to incorporate noise characteristics, it may still be more sensitive to noise in the data compared to model-based approaches that explicitly account for noise in the system model. The robustness of the data-driven method can be compromised if the noise is not adequately characterized or if the data is heavily corrupted. Computational Complexity: The data-driven approach may involve complex computations for estimating system parameters and constructing auxiliary models, especially when dealing with large datasets. This can lead to increased computational burden during the online control process, potentially affecting real-time performance. Equivalence Guarantees: Although the proposed data-driven method establishes equivalence to model-based SMPC under certain conditions, this equivalence may not hold in all scenarios, particularly in the presence of model uncertainties or when the data does not sufficiently represent the underlying system dynamics. Generalization: The data-driven method may struggle to generalize to unseen operating conditions or system configurations, as it is heavily reliant on the specific data used for training. In contrast, model-based SMPC can adapt more readily to changes in system dynamics due to its reliance on a parametric model.

Основные понятия

A data-driven receding-horizon control method is proposed that produces identical control inputs as Stochastic Model Predictive Control (SMPC) for unknown stochastic linear time-invariant systems, while accounting for process noise, measurement noise, and uncertain initial conditions.

Аннотация

The paper proposes a data-driven receding-horizon control method for addressing the chance-constrained output-tracking problem of unknown stochastic linear time-invariant (LTI) systems. The method follows an analogous framework to Stochastic Model Predictive Control (SMPC), but does not rely on the use of a parametric system model.

The key highlights and insights are:

The proposed data-driven method constructs an auxiliary state-space model directly parameterized by input-output data, without requiring knowledge of the system matrices.
A stochastic control problem is formulated using this data-based auxiliary model, which is shown to be equivalent to the associated model-based SMPC problem under certain conditions.
The data-driven method preserves three key features of SMPC: it accounts for process noise and measurement noise, produces a feedback control policy, and incorporates safety chance constraints.
Theoretical equivalence between the data-driven method and SMPC is established, implying that the data-driven approach performs as well as its model-based counterpart.
Simulation results on a grid-connected power converter demonstrate the performance benefits of the proposed data-driven methodology.

Настроить сводку

Переписать с помощью ИИ

Создать цитаты

Перевести источник

На другой язык

Создать интеллект-карту

из исходного контента

Перейти к источнику

arxiv.org

Статистика

The system is subject to process noise wt and measurement noise vt, which are independently and identically distributed (i.i.d.) normally with zero mean and variances Σw and Σv, respectively.

Цитаты

"We propose a data-driven receding-horizon control method dealing with the chance-constrained output-tracking problem of unknown stochastic linear time-invariant (LTI) systems."
"Under certain conditions, we establish that our proposed data-driven control method produces identical control inputs as that produced by the associated model-based SMPC."

Ключевые выводы из

Stochastic Data-Driven Predictive Control with Equivalence to Stochastic MPC

by Ruiqi Li, Jo... в arxiv.org 09-26-2024

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2312.15177.pdf

Stochastic Data-Driven Predictive Control with Equivalence to Stochastic MPC

Дополнительные вопросы

How can the proposed data-driven method be extended to handle non-Gaussian noise distributions?

The proposed data-driven method can be extended to handle non-Gaussian noise distributions by incorporating techniques that allow for the modeling of arbitrary noise characteristics. One approach is to utilize Polynomial Chaos Expansion (PCE), which enables the representation of non-Gaussian random variables through a series of orthogonal polynomials. By applying PCE, the data-driven framework can capture the statistical properties of the noise, allowing for a more accurate representation of the system dynamics under non-Gaussian disturbances.
Additionally, the framework could integrate distributionally robust optimization techniques, which focus on optimizing performance against the worst-case scenarios within a specified set of distributions. This would involve formulating the control problem to account for the uncertainty in the noise distribution, ensuring that the control policies remain effective even when the actual noise deviates from the assumed Gaussian model.
Moreover, the use of robust statistics could be beneficial. By employing robust estimators that are less sensitive to outliers and deviations from the assumed distribution, the data-driven method can maintain performance in the presence of non-Gaussian noise. This adaptation would require modifications to the estimation and control algorithms to ensure that they can effectively handle the complexities introduced by non-Gaussian noise distributions.

What are the potential challenges and limitations of the data-driven approach compared to the model-based SMPC method?

The data-driven approach, while promising, faces several challenges and limitations compared to the model-based Stochastic Model Predictive Control (SMPC) method.

Data Requirements: The data-driven method relies heavily on the availability of high-quality, rich input-output data to accurately capture the system dynamics. In contrast, model-based SMPC can leverage known system models, which may not require extensive data collection. Insufficient or poor-quality data can lead to inaccurate control policies and degraded performance.

Robustness to Noise: While the data-driven method aims to incorporate noise characteristics, it may still be more sensitive to noise in the data compared to model-based approaches that explicitly account for noise in the system model. The robustness of the data-driven method can be compromised if the noise is not adequately characterized or if the data is heavily corrupted.

Computational Complexity: The data-driven approach may involve complex computations for estimating system parameters and constructing auxiliary models, especially when dealing with large datasets. This can lead to increased computational burden during the online control process, potentially affecting real-time performance.

Equivalence Guarantees: Although the proposed data-driven method establishes equivalence to model-based SMPC under certain conditions, this equivalence may not hold in all scenarios, particularly in the presence of model uncertainties or when the data does not sufficiently represent the underlying system dynamics.

Generalization: The data-driven method may struggle to generalize to unseen operating conditions or system configurations, as it is heavily reliant on the specific data used for training. In contrast, model-based SMPC can adapt more readily to changes in system dynamics due to its reliance on a parametric model.

How could the data-driven framework be adapted to address other stochastic control problems, such as distributionally robust SMPC or correlated-noise SMPC?

The data-driven framework can be adapted to address other stochastic control problems, such as distributionally robust SMPC or correlated-noise SMPC, through several strategies:

Incorporating Distributional Robustness: To adapt the data-driven method for distributionally robust SMPC, the framework can be modified to include a worst-case analysis over a set of possible distributions. This involves formulating the optimization problem to minimize the worst-case expected cost across a range of distributions that the noise may follow. Techniques such as ambiguity sets can be employed to define the range of distributions, allowing the controller to remain robust against model uncertainties.

Modeling Correlated Noise: For correlated-noise SMPC, the data-driven framework can be enhanced by explicitly modeling the correlation structure of the noise. This can be achieved by estimating the covariance matrix of the noise from the collected data and incorporating it into the control design. The auxiliary model can be adjusted to account for the correlations, ensuring that the control policies are designed with the correct statistical properties of the noise.

Adaptive Learning: The data-driven framework can incorporate adaptive learning techniques that continuously update the model parameters based on new data. This would allow the controller to adjust to changing noise characteristics or system dynamics over time, enhancing its performance in dynamic environments.

Multi-Stage Decision Making: The framework can be extended to handle multi-stage decision-making processes, where the control actions are optimized over multiple time steps while considering the stochastic nature of the system. This can involve developing a receding-horizon strategy that integrates the principles of distributionally robust optimization and correlated noise handling.

Simulation-Based Approaches: Utilizing simulation-based methods, such as Monte Carlo simulations, can help in evaluating the performance of the data-driven controller under various noise scenarios. This approach allows for the exploration of different stochastic environments and the assessment of the controller's robustness and adaptability.

By implementing these adaptations, the data-driven framework can effectively tackle a broader range of stochastic control problems, enhancing its applicability and performance in real-world scenarios.