аналитика - Data Science and Engineering - # Federated Learning Framework

FL-GUARD: A Holistic Framework for Run-Time Detection and Recovery of Negative Federated Learning

Q: How can FL-GUARD adapt to different types of data distributions among clients

FL-GUARD can adapt to different types of data distributions among clients by utilizing model adaptation techniques. When the data distributions differ among clients, FL-GUARD can personalize the global model learned by the federated learning system for each client. By optimizing an adapted model on each client's local training data, FL-GUARD ensures that the model fits the specific data distribution of that client. This personalized approach allows FL-GUARD to overcome challenges posed by non-IID (non-identically distributed) data and varying levels of heterogeneity in client datasets.

Q: What are the potential ethical implications of using dynamic solutions like FL-GUARD in federated learning systems

The use of dynamic solutions like FL-GUARD in federated learning systems may raise ethical implications related to fairness, transparency, and accountability. One potential concern is ensuring fairness in the learning process, as dynamic detection and recovery mechanisms could inadvertently favor certain clients over others based on their performance or behavior within the system. Transparency is another key consideration, as stakeholders need clear visibility into how decisions are made regarding NFL detection and recovery measures to ensure trust in the system's operation. Additionally, accountability becomes crucial when implementing dynamic solutions as there should be mechanisms in place to address any biases or unintended consequences that may arise from using such adaptive approaches.

Q: How can the concept of Negative Federated Learning be applied to other machine learning paradigms beyond federated learning

The concept of Negative Federated Learning (NFL) can be applied beyond federated learning to other machine learning paradigms where models are trained collaboratively across multiple entities while preserving data privacy. In centralized machine learning settings with distributed datasets or collaborative training environments involving multiple parties sharing models but not raw data, NFL principles could help identify instances where shared models do not benefit all participants equally or fail to improve individual performance compared to standalone training methods. By detecting negative outcomes early and implementing recovery strategies dynamically during training iterations, similar frameworks inspired by NFL could enhance collaboration efficiency and effectiveness across various machine learning contexts beyond federated settings.

Основные понятия

FL-GUARD introduces a dynamic solution for detecting and recovering from Negative Federated Learning in real-time, outperforming previous approaches.

Аннотация

FL-GUARD is a framework designed to address the issue of Negative Federated Learning (NFL) by dynamically detecting NFL at an early stage and activating recovery measures when necessary. The framework focuses on improving the performance of federated learning systems by adapting models to fit local data distributions. By utilizing a cost-effective NFL detection mechanism based on performance gain estimation, FL-GUARD ensures efficient detection and recovery from NFL. Extensive experiments confirm the effectiveness of FL-GUARD in detecting and recovering from NFL, showcasing compatibility with existing solutions while remaining robust against clients unwilling or unable to take recovery measures.

Настроить сводку

Переписать с помощью ИИ

Создать цитаты

Перевести источник

На другой язык

Создать интеллект-карту

из исходного контента

Перейти к источнику

arxiv.org

Статистика

Many studies have reported the failure of Federated Learning (FL) due to issues like data heterogeneity among clients, client inactivity, attacks from malicious clients, and noises introduced by privacy-protection measures.
Consequences of FL failure include clients being unwilling to participate, wasted rounds of client computation, and disintegration of the federation.
FL-GUARD introduces a holistic framework for tackling Negative Federated Learning (NFL) in a run-time paradigm by dynamically detecting NFL early on and activating recovery measures when needed.
The framework relies on a cost-effective NFL detection mechanism based on an estimation of performance gain on clients to detect and recover from NFL efficiently.
Extensive experiment results confirm the effectiveness of FL-GUARD in detecting NFL and recovering from it to ensure healthy learning states.

Цитаты

Ключевые выводы из

FL-GUARD

by Hong Lin,Lid... в arxiv.org 03-08-2024

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2403.04146.pdf

Дополнительные вопросы

How can FL-GUARD adapt to different types of data distributions among clients

FL-GUARD can adapt to different types of data distributions among clients by utilizing model adaptation techniques. When the data distributions differ among clients, FL-GUARD can personalize the global model learned by the federated learning system for each client. By optimizing an adapted model on each client's local training data, FL-GUARD ensures that the model fits the specific data distribution of that client. This personalized approach allows FL-GUARD to overcome challenges posed by non-IID (non-identically distributed) data and varying levels of heterogeneity in client datasets.

What are the potential ethical implications of using dynamic solutions like FL-GUARD in federated learning systems

The use of dynamic solutions like FL-GUARD in federated learning systems may raise ethical implications related to fairness, transparency, and accountability. One potential concern is ensuring fairness in the learning process, as dynamic detection and recovery mechanisms could inadvertently favor certain clients over others based on their performance or behavior within the system. Transparency is another key consideration, as stakeholders need clear visibility into how decisions are made regarding NFL detection and recovery measures to ensure trust in the system's operation. Additionally, accountability becomes crucial when implementing dynamic solutions as there should be mechanisms in place to address any biases or unintended consequences that may arise from using such adaptive approaches.

How can the concept of Negative Federated Learning be applied to other machine learning paradigms beyond federated learning

The concept of Negative Federated Learning (NFL) can be applied beyond federated learning to other machine learning paradigms where models are trained collaboratively across multiple entities while preserving data privacy. In centralized machine learning settings with distributed datasets or collaborative training environments involving multiple parties sharing models but not raw data, NFL principles could help identify instances where shared models do not benefit all participants equally or fail to improve individual performance compared to standalone training methods. By detecting negative outcomes early and implementing recovery strategies dynamically during training iterations, similar frameworks inspired by NFL could enhance collaboration efficiency and effectiveness across various machine learning contexts beyond federated settings.