аналитика - Machine Learning - # Nonlinear System Identification

Identification of Analytic Nonlinear Dynamical Systems with Non-asymptotic Guarantees Using Least Squares Estimation and Set Membership Estimation

Q: How can the analysis be extended to handle nonlinear systems with non-analytic feature functions, which are prevalent in many real-world applications?

Extending the analysis to non-analytic feature functions, particularly those commonly found in real-world systems like ReLU networks, presents a significant challenge. The current analysis heavily relies on the properties of real-analytic functions, specifically their ability to be persistently exciting due to the measure-zero property of their zero sets. This property does not hold for non-analytic functions. Here are some potential directions for future research: Piecewise Analysis: For piecewise-analytic functions, one could attempt a piecewise analysis, establishing BMSB conditions within each analytic region and then stitching together the results. This would require careful consideration of the transitions between regions and how the system's dynamics behave near these boundaries. Approximation with Analytic Functions: Another approach could involve approximating non-analytic functions with analytic ones, such as using smooth approximations for ReLU. The error introduced by this approximation would need to be quantified and incorporated into the convergence rate analysis. Alternative Excitation Conditions: Instead of relying solely on the BMSB condition, which is directly linked to persistent excitation, exploring alternative conditions that guarantee sufficient exploration for non-analytic systems could be fruitful. This might involve analyzing the system's behavior in specific regions of the state-input space or leveraging properties of the specific non-analytic functions involved. Active Exploration: As the paper hints, active exploration strategies could be essential for efficiently learning systems with non-analytic feature functions. Designing and analyzing such strategies, potentially in conjunction with the above approaches, would be crucial for handling these systems.

Q: While the paper focuses on non-active exploration, could active exploration strategies further accelerate the convergence rates of LSE and SME for these systems?

Yes, active exploration strategies have the potential to significantly accelerate the convergence rates of both LSE and SME for linearly parameterized nonlinear systems, even those with analytic feature functions. Here's why: Overcoming Slow Exploration: While non-active exploration with i.i.d. noise can eventually explore the system, it might be slow, especially in regions where the feature functions are relatively flat. Active exploration can directly target these regions, injecting informative inputs to accelerate learning. Exploiting System Structure: Active exploration allows for the exploitation of the known structure of the feature functions, ϕ(x,u). By designing input sequences that maximize the information gain about the unknown parameters θ, the convergence rate can be improved. Optimizing for Uncertainty Reduction: Active exploration strategies can be designed to specifically target regions of high uncertainty in the parameter space. This focused exploration can lead to faster reduction in the uncertainty set estimated by SME and more accurate parameter estimates from LSE. Some potential active exploration strategies include: Optimal Experiment Design: This involves selecting input sequences that optimize certain criteria related to the information matrix, such as maximizing its minimum eigenvalue or determinant. Thompson Sampling: This strategy samples parameters from the current belief distribution (e.g., the uncertainty set in SME) and then selects inputs that would be optimal under those parameters. Information-Directed Sampling: This approach selects inputs that maximize the expected information gain about the unknown parameters, balancing exploration and exploitation.

Основные понятия

This research paper demonstrates that non-active exploration using i.i.d. random inputs is sufficient for efficient parameter estimation in linearly parameterized nonlinear systems, provided that the feature functions are real-analytic and the noise/disturbance distributions are semi-continuous.

Аннотация

Настроить сводку

Переписать с помощью ИИ

Создать цитаты

Перевести источник

На другой язык

Создать интеллект-карту

из исходного контента

Перейти к источнику

arxiv.org

Musavi, N., Guo, Z., Dullerud, G., & Li, Y. (2024). Identification of Analytic Nonlinear Dynamical Systems with Non-asymptotic Guarantees. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 38.

This paper investigates the efficacy of non-active exploration, using i.i.d. random inputs, for identifying linearly parameterized nonlinear dynamical systems with real-analytic feature functions. The study aims to establish non-asymptotic convergence rates for both Least Squares Estimation (LSE) and Set Membership Estimation (SME) under these conditions.

Ключевые выводы из

Identification of Analytic Nonlinear Dynamical Systems with Non-asymptotic Guarantees

by Negin Musavi... в arxiv.org 11-04-2024

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2411.00656.pdf

Identification of Analytic Nonlinear Dynamical Systems with Non-asymptotic Guarantees

Дополнительные вопросы

How can the analysis be extended to handle nonlinear systems with non-analytic feature functions, which are prevalent in many real-world applications?

Extending the analysis to non-analytic feature functions, particularly those commonly found in real-world systems like ReLU networks, presents a significant challenge. The current analysis heavily relies on the properties of real-analytic functions, specifically their ability to be persistently exciting due to the measure-zero property of their zero sets. This property does not hold for non-analytic functions. Here are some potential directions for future research:

Piecewise Analysis: For piecewise-analytic functions, one could attempt a piecewise analysis, establishing BMSB conditions within each analytic region and then stitching together the results. This would require careful consideration of the transitions between regions and how the system's dynamics behave near these boundaries.
Approximation with Analytic Functions: Another approach could involve approximating non-analytic functions with analytic ones, such as using smooth approximations for ReLU. The error introduced by this approximation would need to be quantified and incorporated into the convergence rate analysis.
Alternative Excitation Conditions:  Instead of relying solely on the BMSB condition, which is directly linked to persistent excitation, exploring alternative conditions that guarantee sufficient exploration for non-analytic systems could be fruitful. This might involve analyzing the system's behavior in specific regions of the state-input space or leveraging properties of the specific non-analytic functions involved.
Active Exploration: As the paper hints, active exploration strategies could be essential for efficiently learning systems with non-analytic feature functions. Designing and analyzing such strategies, potentially in conjunction with the above approaches, would be crucial for handling these systems.

While the paper focuses on non-active exploration, could active exploration strategies further accelerate the convergence rates of LSE and SME for these systems?

Yes, active exploration strategies have the potential to significantly accelerate the convergence rates of both LSE and SME for linearly parameterized nonlinear systems, even those with analytic feature functions. Here's why:

Overcoming Slow Exploration: While non-active exploration with i.i.d. noise can eventually explore the system, it might be slow, especially in regions where the feature functions are relatively flat. Active exploration can directly target these regions, injecting informative inputs to accelerate learning.
Exploiting System Structure: Active exploration allows for the exploitation of the known structure of the feature functions, ϕ(x,u). By designing input sequences that maximize the information gain about the unknown parameters θ, the convergence rate can be improved.
Optimizing for Uncertainty Reduction:  Active exploration strategies can be designed to specifically target regions of high uncertainty in the parameter space. This focused exploration can lead to faster reduction in the uncertainty set estimated by SME and more accurate parameter estimates from LSE.
Some potential active exploration strategies include:

Optimal Experiment Design: This involves selecting input sequences that optimize certain criteria related to the information matrix, such as maximizing its minimum eigenvalue or determinant.
Thompson Sampling: This strategy samples parameters from the current belief distribution (e.g., the uncertainty set in SME) and then selects inputs that would be optimal under those parameters.
Information-Directed Sampling: This approach selects inputs that maximize the expected information gain about the unknown parameters, balancing exploration and exploitation.

Considering the insights from this research, how can we design robust and adaptive control strategies that leverage the efficient identification of these nonlinear systems in real-time applications?

The efficient identification techniques for linearly parameterized nonlinear systems, as presented in the paper, open up exciting possibilities for designing robust and adaptive control strategies for real-time applications. Here are some key considerations:

Uncertainty-Aware Control: The uncertainty set estimated by SME provides valuable information about the potential range of system parameters. Robust control techniques, such as robust MPC or H-infinity control, can be employed, explicitly accounting for this uncertainty set to guarantee stability and performance despite the model uncertainties.
Adaptive Control with Guaranteed Convergence: The convergence rate guarantees for LSE and SME can be leveraged to design adaptive control strategies with provable convergence properties. As the system is identified online, the controller can be updated accordingly, ensuring that the closed-loop system converges to the desired behavior.
Real-Time Implementation: The non-asymptotic nature of the convergence results is crucial for real-time applications. Knowing the rate at which the uncertainty reduces allows for determining the required identification time for a desired level of control performance, enabling practical implementation.
Safe Exploration: In safety-critical applications, exploration needs to be carefully managed. Techniques like safe exploration in reinforcement learning, where constraints are imposed on the system's behavior during exploration, can be adapted to ensure safety while learning the system.
Data-Driven Control Design: The identified model can be used for data-driven control design techniques, such as model predictive control (MPC) or reinforcement learning (RL). The accurate model obtained through efficient identification can significantly improve the performance and reliability of these data-driven controllers.
By combining these approaches, it becomes possible to develop control strategies that are not only robust to model uncertainties but also adapt and improve their performance over time, leading to more efficient, reliable, and safer control systems for real-world applications.