insikt - ComputerSecurityandPrivacy - # Fake News Detection

FNDEX: A System for Detecting Fake News and Doxxing Using Explainable AI and Anonymization Techniques

Q: How can social media platforms be encouraged to adopt and implement similar frameworks to combat fake news and doxxing on their platforms?

Encouraging social media platforms to adopt frameworks like FNDEX to combat fake news and doxxing requires a multi-pronged approach: Regulation and Legislation: Governments can play a role by introducing legislation that incentivizes or mandates platforms to take responsibility for the content shared. This could involve fines for non-compliance or rewards for implementing effective detection and mitigation strategies. Public Pressure and Advocacy: Grassroots campaigns and advocacy groups can raise awareness about the harms of fake news and doxxing, pressuring platforms to prioritize user safety. Public pressure can be a powerful motivator for companies to take action. Collaboration and Industry Standards: Encouraging collaboration between platforms, researchers, and technology providers can lead to the development of shared resources and best practices for combating these issues. Establishing industry-wide standards for content moderation and user privacy can create a level playing field. Transparency and Accountability: Platforms should be transparent about their efforts to combat fake news and doxxing, publishing regular reports on their progress and the effectiveness of their measures. This accountability can foster trust with users and encourage continuous improvement. User Empowerment and Education: Platforms should provide users with tools and resources to identify and report fake news and doxxing. Educating users about online safety, critical thinking, and responsible digital citizenship is crucial. Financial Incentives: Governments or regulatory bodies could offer financial incentives, such as tax breaks or grants, to platforms that invest in and implement robust systems for detecting and mitigating fake news and doxxing. By combining these approaches, a comprehensive strategy can be developed to encourage social media platforms to take a more proactive and responsible approach to combating fake news and doxxing.

Q: Could the use of anonymization techniques in FNDEX potentially be exploited by malicious actors to spread misinformation or harass individuals while remaining undetected?

While FNDEX's anonymization techniques are designed to protect individuals, there's a risk of exploitation by malicious actors. Here's how: Masking Malicious Intent: Anonymization primarily focuses on PII, potentially overlooking malicious intent hidden within the remaining text. A doxxing attempt could be disguised as a seemingly harmless message after anonymization, allowing it to slip through the cracks. Manipulating Placeholders: Clever use of language could turn placeholders into subtle forms of harassment or misinformation. For example, repeatedly using "FULL NAME" in a derogatory context, even without actual names, can still create a hostile environment. Bypassing Detection: Malicious actors might devise ways to structure their messages to evade pattern-based detection. This could involve using creative spellings, inserting special characters, or employing code words to convey sensitive information without triggering the anonymization process. To mitigate these risks, FNDEX needs continuous improvement: Contextual Analysis: Moving beyond pattern recognition to incorporate contextual analysis can help identify malicious intent even in anonymized text. This requires understanding the nuances of language and sentiment. Placeholder Management: Implementing stricter rules around placeholder usage can prevent their misuse. This could involve limiting their frequency or flagging suspicious patterns of placeholder use. Dynamic Adaptation: The system must constantly evolve to stay ahead of malicious actors' tactics. This requires ongoing research and development to identify new patterns of abuse and adapt the anonymization and detection mechanisms accordingly. It's crucial to acknowledge that no system is foolproof. A combination of technological advancements, user awareness, and platform responsibility is essential to minimize the risk of anonymization techniques being exploited for malicious purposes.

Q: In an era of increasing reliance on AI, how can we ensure that explainability is not just an add-on feature but a fundamental aspect of AI system design, particularly in sensitive domains like online safety and security?

In sensitive domains like online safety and security, explainability in AI should be a core design principle, not an afterthought. Here's how we can achieve this: Explainability by Design: Integrating explainability from the initial stages of AI development is crucial. This involves choosing algorithms and architectures that inherently offer transparency and building in mechanisms to track and explain decision-making processes. Standardized Explainability Metrics: Developing standardized metrics to evaluate the explainability of AI systems can help compare different approaches and ensure a consistent level of transparency across applications. Regulation and Ethical Guidelines: Establishing regulations and ethical guidelines that mandate explainability in AI systems operating in sensitive domains can provide a framework for responsible development and deployment. User-Centric Design: Designing AI systems with the end-user in mind, providing clear and understandable explanations tailored to their needs and level of expertise, is essential for building trust and ensuring meaningful transparency. Education and Training: Educating developers, policymakers, and the public about the importance of explainable AI and providing training on how to design, implement, and use such systems is crucial for fostering a culture of transparency and accountability. Open-Source Development and Collaboration: Encouraging open-source development of explainable AI tools and fostering collaboration between researchers, developers, and industry stakeholders can accelerate progress in this field. By embedding explainability into the very fabric of AI system design, we can create more trustworthy, accountable, and reliable AI applications, particularly in sensitive domains where the stakes are high. This shift towards explainable AI is not just a technological challenge but also a societal imperative, ensuring that AI technologies are developed and used responsibly and ethically.

Centrala begrepp

This research paper introduces FNDEX, a novel system that leverages transformer models to detect fake news and doxxing, employs a three-step anonymization process to protect sensitive information, and utilizes explainable AI (XAI) to provide transparency and accountability for its outcomes.

Sammanfattning

FNDEX: Fake News and Doxxing Detection with Explainable AI - Research Paper Summary

Bibliographic Information: Sallami, D., & A¨ımeur, E. (2024). FNDEX: Fake News and Doxxing Detection with Explainable AI. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.22390v1.

Research Objective: This paper introduces FNDEX, a novel system designed to address the growing concerns of fake news and doxxing in online environments. The research aims to develop effective detection strategies for both threats while incorporating anonymization techniques to safeguard individual privacy and utilizing Explainable AI (XAI) for transparency and accountability.

Methodology: The FNDEX system utilizes three distinct transformer models (BERT, DistilBERT, and RoBERTa) to detect fake news and doxxing. A three-step anonymization process based on pattern recognition and replacement is employed to protect personally identifiable information (PII). The system incorporates LIME (Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations) to provide insights into the decision-making process of the detection models. The researchers evaluated FNDEX's performance on a Kaggle dataset for fake news detection and a dataset of tweets for doxxing detection.

Key Findings: The study found that transformer-based models, particularly RoBERTa, significantly outperformed baseline models in both fake news and doxxing detection tasks. The anonymization process effectively masked PII while preserving the contextual integrity and utility of the text. The use of LIME provided clear and interpretable explanations for the model's predictions, enhancing transparency and user trust.

Main Conclusions: The research concludes that FNDEX offers a promising approach to combatting fake news and doxxing by combining accurate detection, effective anonymization, and explainable AI. The system's ability to protect privacy while maintaining data utility makes it a valuable tool for fostering a safer and more trustworthy online environment.

Significance: This research makes a significant contribution to the field of online safety and security by addressing the interconnected challenges of fake news and doxxing. The proposed framework, with its focus on explainability and privacy preservation, offers a practical and ethical approach to mitigating these threats.

Limitations and Future Research: The study acknowledges limitations regarding the availability of publicly accessible datasets for doxxing detection. Future research could explore the development of synthetic datasets or collaborate with social media platforms to access anonymized data for training and evaluation. Additionally, exploring the integration of other XAI methods beyond LIME could further enhance the system's transparency and interpretability.

Anpassa sammanfattning

Skriv om med AI

Generera citat

Översätt källa

Till ett annat språk

Generera MindMap

från källinnehåll

Besök källa

arxiv.org

Statistik

DistilBERT achieves a 40% reduction in size compared to BERT while retaining 97% of its language understanding capabilities and demonstrating a 60% faster processing speed.
RoBERTa achieved an accuracy of 99.99%, precision of 100%, recall of 100%, and an F1 score of 99.98% in Doxxing Detection.
RoBERTa achieved an accuracy of 99.65%, precision of 99.89%, recall of 99.44%, and an F1 score of 99.66% in Fake News Detection.
The cosine similarity score between the original and anonymized texts is 0.849.
The Jaccard Similarity score between the original and anonymized texts is 0.844.
The semantic similarity score between the original and anonymized texts is 0.950.
The BLEU score of the anonymized text is 0.84.
The Normalized Certainty Penalty (NCP) is 0.006.

Citat

"The internet has effectively turned the entire world into a global village, easily and quickly connecting people from different corners of the globe. However, it has also heightened various social harms, such as bullying and harassment, hate speech, disinformation, and radicalization."
"Fake news and doxxing often intertwine when false narratives are used to justify or legitimize the exposure of someone’s private information."
"In the realm of artificial intelligence applications, establishing trust is paramount to facilitate informed decision-making, as a lack of trust can lead to the disregard of AI-generated advice."

Viktiga insikter från

FNDEX: Fake News and Doxxing Detection with Explainable AI

by Dors... på arxiv.org 10-31-2024

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2410.22390.pdf

FNDEX: Fake News and Doxxing Detection with Explainable AI

Djupare frågor

How can social media platforms be encouraged to adopt and implement similar frameworks to combat fake news and doxxing on their platforms?

Encouraging social media platforms to adopt frameworks like FNDEX to combat fake news and doxxing requires a multi-pronged approach:

Regulation and Legislation: Governments can play a role by introducing legislation that incentivizes or mandates platforms to take responsibility for the content shared. This could involve fines for non-compliance or rewards for implementing effective detection and mitigation strategies.
Public Pressure and Advocacy: Grassroots campaigns and advocacy groups can raise awareness about the harms of fake news and doxxing, pressuring platforms to prioritize user safety. Public pressure can be a powerful motivator for companies to take action.
Collaboration and Industry Standards: Encouraging collaboration between platforms, researchers, and technology providers can lead to the development of shared resources and best practices for combating these issues. Establishing industry-wide standards for content moderation and user privacy can create a level playing field.
Transparency and Accountability: Platforms should be transparent about their efforts to combat fake news and doxxing, publishing regular reports on their progress and the effectiveness of their measures. This accountability can foster trust with users and encourage continuous improvement.
User Empowerment and Education: Platforms should provide users with tools and resources to identify and report fake news and doxxing. Educating users about online safety, critical thinking, and responsible digital citizenship is crucial.
Financial Incentives: Governments or regulatory bodies could offer financial incentives, such as tax breaks or grants, to platforms that invest in and implement robust systems for detecting and mitigating fake news and doxxing.
By combining these approaches, a comprehensive strategy can be developed to encourage social media platforms to take a more proactive and responsible approach to combating fake news and doxxing.

Could the use of anonymization techniques in FNDEX potentially be exploited by malicious actors to spread misinformation or harass individuals while remaining undetected?

While FNDEX's anonymization techniques are designed to protect individuals, there's a risk of exploitation by malicious actors. Here's how:

Masking Malicious Intent: Anonymization primarily focuses on PII, potentially overlooking malicious intent hidden within the remaining text.  A doxxing attempt could be disguised as a seemingly harmless message after anonymization, allowing it to slip through the cracks.
Manipulating Placeholders:  Clever use of language could turn placeholders into subtle forms of harassment or misinformation. For example, repeatedly using "FULL NAME" in a derogatory context, even without actual names, can still create a hostile environment.
Bypassing Detection:  Malicious actors might devise ways to structure their messages to evade pattern-based detection. This could involve using creative spellings, inserting special characters, or employing code words to convey sensitive information without triggering the anonymization process.
To mitigate these risks, FNDEX needs continuous improvement:

Contextual Analysis:  Moving beyond pattern recognition to incorporate contextual analysis can help identify malicious intent even in anonymized text. This requires understanding the nuances of language and sentiment.
Placeholder Management:  Implementing stricter rules around placeholder usage can prevent their misuse. This could involve limiting their frequency or flagging suspicious patterns of placeholder use.
Dynamic Adaptation:  The system must constantly evolve to stay ahead of malicious actors' tactics. This requires ongoing research and development to identify new patterns of abuse and adapt the anonymization and detection mechanisms accordingly.
It's crucial to acknowledge that no system is foolproof.  A combination of technological advancements, user awareness, and platform responsibility is essential to minimize the risk of anonymization techniques being exploited for malicious purposes.

In an era of increasing reliance on AI, how can we ensure that explainability is not just an add-on feature but a fundamental aspect of AI system design, particularly in sensitive domains like online safety and security?

In sensitive domains like online safety and security, explainability in AI should be a core design principle, not an afterthought. Here's how we can achieve this:

Explainability by Design:  Integrating explainability from the initial stages of AI development is crucial. This involves choosing algorithms and architectures that inherently offer transparency and building in mechanisms to track and explain decision-making processes.
Standardized Explainability Metrics:  Developing standardized metrics to evaluate the explainability of AI systems can help compare different approaches and ensure a consistent level of transparency across applications.
Regulation and Ethical Guidelines:  Establishing regulations and ethical guidelines that mandate explainability in AI systems operating in sensitive domains can provide a framework for responsible development and deployment.
User-Centric Design:  Designing AI systems with the end-user in mind, providing clear and understandable explanations tailored to their needs and level of expertise, is essential for building trust and ensuring meaningful transparency.
Education and Training:  Educating developers, policymakers, and the public about the importance of explainable AI and providing training on how to design, implement, and use such systems is crucial for fostering a culture of transparency and accountability.
Open-Source Development and Collaboration:  Encouraging open-source development of explainable AI tools and fostering collaboration between researchers, developers, and industry stakeholders can accelerate progress in this field.
By embedding explainability into the very fabric of AI system design, we can create more trustworthy, accountable, and reliable AI applications, particularly in sensitive domains where the stakes are high. This shift towards explainable AI is not just a technological challenge but also a societal imperative, ensuring that AI technologies are developed and used responsibly and ethically.