Online Graph Filtering for Expanding Graphs with Known and Unknown Connectivity

Temel Kavramlar

This paper proposes an online graph filtering framework to process signals over expanding graphs, where the graph topology can evolve over time with the addition of new nodes. The framework addresses scenarios where the connectivity of the incoming nodes is both known and unknown, and it updates the graph filters using online learning principles.

Özet

The paper addresses the problem of graph signal processing over expanding graphs, where the graph topology can change over time with the addition of new nodes. It proposes an online graph filtering framework that can handle both deterministic and stochastic settings for the connectivity of the incoming nodes.

Key highlights:

1. In the deterministic setting, the connectivity of the incoming nodes is known, and the authors develop an online projected gradient descent algorithm to update the graph filter parameters.
2. In the stochastic setting, the connectivity of the incoming nodes is unknown and modeled using probabilistic attachment rules. The authors propose an online stochastic gradient descent algorithm to update the filter parameters.
3. The authors also introduce an adaptive stochastic online filtering approach that learns a combination of multiple attachment rules to better capture the evolving graph topology.
4. Regret analyses are provided for the proposed online algorithms, highlighting the role of the filter order, the growing graph model, and the online learning algorithm.
5. Numerical experiments on synthetic and real-world data, including recommender systems and COVID-19 case prediction, demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed online filtering approaches compared to batch and pre-trained filters, as well as other state-of-the-art alternatives.

İstatistikler

"The maximum number of edges formed by each incoming node is much smaller than the existing number of nodes, i.e., Mmax ≪ Nt-1."
"The attachment vectors at and the stochastic model-based weight vectors wt are upper-bounded by a scalar wh."
"The filter parameters h are upper-bounded in their energy, i.e., E(h) = ||h||^2_2 ≤ H^2."
"The residue rt = a^T_t A_x,t-1 h - xt is upper-bounded, i.e., there exists a finite scalar R > 0 such that |rt| ≤ R."

Alıntılar

"Graph filters are a well-established tool to process network data and have found use in a variety of applications, including node classification [2], [3], signal interpolation [4], and product recommendation [5]."
"Most of the filters in literature are designed out over graphs with a fixed number of nodes [6] despite graphs often growing through the addition of nodes, sometimes sequentially over time [9], [10]."
"Differently, here we consider the filter design over a stream of incoming nodes."

Önemli Bilgiler Şuradan Elde Edildi

Online Graph Filtering Over Expanding Graphs

by Bishwadeep D... : arxiv.org 09-12-2024

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2409.07204.pdf

Daha Derin Sorular

How can the proposed online filtering framework be extended to handle dynamic changes in the graph structure beyond just the addition of new nodes, such as the removal or rewiring of existing edges?

The proposed online filtering framework can be extended to accommodate dynamic changes in the graph structure by incorporating mechanisms to handle edge removal and rewiring. This can be achieved through the following strategies:

Dynamic Adjacency Matrix Updates: The framework can be modified to allow for real-time updates to the adjacency matrix. When an edge is removed, the corresponding entry in the adjacency matrix can be set to zero, and the filter can be adjusted accordingly. For rewiring, the framework can update the adjacency matrix to reflect the new connections while maintaining the existing structure.

Edge Weight Adaptation: In addition to managing the presence or absence of edges, the framework can include a mechanism to adapt the weights of existing edges based on new information or changes in the graph. This could involve recalibrating weights based on recent interactions or applying decay functions to reduce the influence of outdated connections.

Incorporating Edge Features: By integrating features associated with edges (e.g., strength of connection, type of relationship), the filtering framework can better adapt to changes in the graph. This would allow the model to learn from the context of edge changes, enhancing its predictive capabilities.

Temporal Graph Models: Utilizing temporal graph models that explicitly account for the evolution of both nodes and edges over time can provide a robust framework for online filtering. This approach can capture the dynamics of graph changes, allowing the filtering process to adapt to both node additions and edge modifications.

Regret Analysis for Edge Changes: The regret analysis can be extended to include scenarios where edges are removed or rewired. This would involve defining new loss functions that account for the impact of these changes on the filtering performance, thereby providing a comprehensive understanding of the algorithm's robustness in dynamic environments.

By implementing these strategies, the online filtering framework can effectively manage not only the addition of new nodes but also the complexities introduced by edge removal and rewiring, thereby enhancing its applicability in real-world scenarios.

What are the potential applications of the online graph filtering approach in domains beyond recommender systems and epidemic modeling, such as social network analysis or urban planning?

The online graph filtering approach has a wide range of potential applications across various domains beyond recommender systems and epidemic modeling. Some notable applications include:

Social Network Analysis: In social networks, the online graph filtering framework can be used to analyze user interactions and influence patterns in real-time. By filtering signals from user activities, the framework can help identify emerging trends, detect communities, and predict user behavior, enabling targeted marketing and content recommendations.

Urban Planning: The framework can assist urban planners in analyzing the dynamics of urban environments. By modeling the relationships between different urban elements (e.g., transportation networks, public services, and demographics), planners can use online filtering to assess the impact of new developments, optimize resource allocation, and simulate the effects of policy changes on urban growth.

Financial Networks: In finance, the online graph filtering approach can be applied to monitor and predict market trends by analyzing the relationships between different financial entities (e.g., stocks, bonds, and commodities). This can help in risk assessment, fraud detection, and portfolio optimization by filtering signals from market data in real-time.

Traffic Management: The framework can be utilized in traffic management systems to analyze and predict traffic flow patterns. By filtering signals from various traffic sensors and GPS data, the system can provide real-time traffic updates, optimize traffic light timings, and suggest alternative routes to reduce congestion.

Biological Networks: In bioinformatics, online graph filtering can be applied to study biological networks, such as protein-protein interaction networks or gene regulatory networks. By filtering signals from experimental data, researchers can identify key interactions, predict the effects of genetic modifications, and understand complex biological processes.

Telecommunications: The framework can be used to optimize network performance in telecommunications by analyzing user connectivity patterns and service usage. This can help in resource allocation, network design, and improving user experience by adapting to changing network conditions.

These applications demonstrate the versatility of the online graph filtering approach, making it a valuable tool for analyzing complex systems across various fields.

Can the regret analysis be further refined to provide tighter bounds on the performance of the online filtering algorithms, especially in the stochastic setting with multiple attachment rules?

Yes, the regret analysis can be further refined to provide tighter bounds on the performance of online filtering algorithms, particularly in the stochastic setting with multiple attachment rules. Here are several strategies to achieve this:

Refined Loss Function Analysis: By conducting a more detailed analysis of the loss functions used in the online filtering algorithms, tighter bounds can be established. This involves examining the specific characteristics of the loss functions, such as their Lipschitz continuity and convexity properties, to derive sharper regret bounds.

Adaptive Learning Rates: Implementing adaptive learning rates that adjust based on the performance of the algorithm can lead to tighter regret bounds. By dynamically modifying the learning rate in response to the observed loss, the algorithm can converge more effectively, reducing the overall regret.

Incorporating Variance Reduction Techniques: In the stochastic setting, incorporating variance reduction techniques can help in obtaining tighter bounds. Techniques such as control variates or importance sampling can be employed to reduce the variance of the estimates, leading to more accurate predictions and lower regret.

Multi-Rule Ensemble Analysis: When dealing with multiple attachment rules, the analysis can be refined by considering the ensemble effects of these rules. By analyzing how different rules contribute to the overall performance, tighter bounds can be established that account for the interactions between the rules and their collective impact on the regret.

Bounding the Distance Between Filters: The regret analysis can be improved by providing tighter bounds on the distance between the stochastic and deterministic filters. This can be achieved by leveraging additional information about the attachment probabilities and weights, allowing for a more precise characterization of the performance gap.

Utilizing Concentration Inequalities: Applying concentration inequalities can help in bounding the stochastic components of the regret. By leveraging results from probability theory, such as Hoeffding's or Bernstein's inequalities, tighter bounds can be derived for the expected loss, leading to improved regret analysis.

Empirical Validation: Finally, conducting extensive empirical studies to validate the theoretical bounds can provide insights into their tightness. By comparing the theoretical regret bounds with empirical performance, adjustments can be made to the analysis to ensure it accurately reflects the algorithm's behavior in practice.

By implementing these strategies, the regret analysis can be refined to yield tighter bounds on the performance of online filtering algorithms, enhancing their theoretical understanding and practical applicability in dynamic environments.