The Impact of Automated Workplace Surveillance on Remote Employees with Disabilities

Temel Kavramlar

Automated workplace surveillance tools can create significant challenges and inequities for remote employees with disabilities, undermining their work performance and well-being.

Özet

The content discusses the increasing use of automated surveillance tools by employers to monitor the activities of remote workers, and the disproportionate impact this can have on employees with disabilities.

Key points:

• Telework has grown significantly, with 47% of federal employees participating in FY2021. However, the use of automated surveillance tools to monitor remote workers has also increased.
• Automated surveillance tools can track keystrokes, eye gaze, facial expressions, location, and more, which can be problematic for employees with disabilities. The author, a visually impaired worker with OCD, has faced barriers due to these tools in past positions.
• Automated surveillance does not accurately reflect the quality of an employee's work or account for the different ways employees with disabilities successfully complete their tasks. It can force skilled disabled workers out of positions.
• Automated surveillance creates a stressful work environment, negatively impacting employee morale. Employees may avoid using necessary accommodations or disclosing their disabilities to avoid potential negative consequences.
• There are legal implications, as the use of these tools must comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The government is also starting to review the broader impact of automated surveillance in the workplace.
• Agencies should carefully evaluate the risks and implications of automated surveillance before implementing these systems, considering the unique challenges for employees with disabilities.

İstatistikler

As of FY2021, a reported 47% of Federal employees participated in telework.
A recent survey found that if remote work flexibility is taken away, 45% of government employees will look for another job.

Alıntılar

"Automated surveillance tools can make employees vulnerable to discrimination, particularly those with disabilities."
"Disclosing a disability is a personal choice, and thinking about the impact of a negative surveillance rating should not force anyone to disclose their disability or avoid utilizing workplace accommodations."

Önemli Bilgiler Şuradan Elde Edildi

How Automated Surveillance Impacts Remote Workers with Disabilities

by Lex Huth : alexahuth.medium.com 04-15-2024

https://alexahuth.medium.com/how-automated-surveillance-impacts-remote-workers-with-disabilities-f0a640023d3a

Daha Derin Sorular

How can employers balance the need for productivity monitoring with the rights and needs of employees with disabilities in a remote work environment?

Employers can balance the need for productivity monitoring with the rights and needs of employees with disabilities in a remote work environment by implementing a more holistic approach to performance evaluation. Instead of solely relying on automated surveillance tools that may not accurately reflect the quality of work or consider the unique challenges faced by employees with disabilities, employers can consider a combination of output-based assessments, regular check-ins, and feedback sessions. This approach allows for a more comprehensive understanding of an employee's contributions while also taking into account any accommodations or support needed due to disabilities. Additionally, employers should prioritize open communication with employees, including those with disabilities, to ensure that monitoring practices are transparent, fair, and respectful of individual rights and needs.

What are the potential unintended consequences of automated surveillance tools that employers may overlook, and how can these be mitigated?

One potential unintended consequence of automated surveillance tools is the creation of a stressful work environment that negatively impacts employee morale, particularly for individuals with disabilities. Employers may overlook the psychological toll that constant monitoring can have on employees, leading to increased anxiety, distrust, and a sense of invasion of privacy. To mitigate these consequences, employers should prioritize the well-being of their employees by fostering a culture of trust, respect, and open communication. Additionally, clear policies and guidelines regarding the use of surveillance tools should be established, ensuring that employees are aware of the purpose, scope, and limitations of monitoring practices. Employers should also provide avenues for feedback and address any concerns or issues raised by employees promptly and effectively.

How can the development and deployment of automated surveillance technologies be made more inclusive and accessible for people with diverse abilities and needs?

To make the development and deployment of automated surveillance technologies more inclusive and accessible for people with diverse abilities and needs, developers and employers should prioritize diversity, equity, and inclusion in the design and implementation of these tools. This includes actively involving individuals with disabilities in the development process to ensure that the tools are designed with accessibility in mind. Additionally, developers should conduct thorough accessibility testing and consider the diverse needs of users, including those with visual impairments, mobility limitations, or cognitive disabilities. Employers should also provide training and support to employees on how to use and interact with surveillance tools in a way that accommodates different abilities and preferences. By incorporating accessibility features and considering the needs of all users, automated surveillance technologies can be more inclusive and beneficial for employees with diverse abilities.