Triple/Debiased Lasso for Statistical Inference of Conditional Average Treatment Effects

Temel Kavramlar

This study introduces the Triple/Debiased Lasso (TDL) estimator for consistent estimation and statistical inference of Conditional Average Treatment Effects (CATEs) without directly assuming sparsity in high-dimensional linear regression models.

Özet

The study focuses on estimating CATEs, emphasizing individualized causal effects. It proposes a three-step methodology involving nuisance parameter estimation, Lasso regularization, and debiased Lasso techniques to achieve √n-consistency and confidence intervals. The TDL estimator is validated through simulation studies and theoretical properties analysis.

The content discusses the challenges in CATE estimation from observational data with binary treatments. It explores linear regression models with high-dimensional covariates, utilizing Lasso regularization to handle sparsity. The proposed TDL estimator combines DML and debiased Lasso techniques for improved bias reduction.

Key points include the assumption of linearity in outcomes associated with binary treatments, the importance of estimating CATEs accurately, and the methodology's focus on reducing bias using advanced machine learning techniques. The study also highlights related works in CATE estimation and high-dimensional linear regression methods.

İstatistikler

λ ≍ p log(p)/n
s0 = o(p log(p)/n)
√n|buDML - ui| = oP(1)
maxj,d bΣ2j ≤ M^2

Alıntılar

"We refer to our estimation method as the Triple/Debiased Lasso (TDL), applying both DML and debiased Lasso techniques."
"Our interest lies in consistent estimation and statistical inference for the CATE."

Önemli Bilgiler Şuradan Elde Edildi

Triple/Debiased Lasso for Statistical Inference of Conditional Average Treatment Effects

by Masahiro Kat... : arxiv.org 03-07-2024

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2403.03240.pdf

Daha Derin Sorular

How does the TDL approach compare to traditional methods in estimating CATEs

The Triple/Debiased Lasso (TDL) approach differs from traditional methods in estimating Conditional Average Treatment Effects (CATEs) primarily in its handling of high-dimensional linear regression models without directly assuming sparsity. Traditional methods often rely on assumptions of sparsity to deal with the high dimensionality of the data and to obtain consistent estimators. In contrast, TDL does not impose sparsity directly on the regression models for each treatment's outcome but considers it only in the difference between outcomes.
By incorporating techniques from double/debiased machine learning (DML) and debiased Lasso, TDL aims to reduce bias and improve consistency in estimating CATEs. The use of DML helps address biases introduced by nuisance parameters estimation, while debiased Lasso aids in reducing bias caused by regularization. This triple approach enhances the accuracy and reliability of CATE estimation compared to traditional methods that may solely rely on sparse models or other standard regression techniques.

What are the implications of not imposing sparsity directly on regression models for each treatment's outcome

Not imposing sparsity directly on regression models for each treatment's outcome has significant implications for CATE estimation. By allowing flexibility in modeling without strict adherence to sparse structures, this approach opens up possibilities for capturing more nuanced relationships between covariates and outcomes.
In scenarios where true relationships are complex or do not align with sparse assumptions, imposing sparsity could lead to biased estimates or overlook important features influencing treatment effects. Allowing non-sparse models specifically for differences between outcomes enables a more comprehensive representation of individualized causal effects without restricting model complexity unnecessarily.
This strategy acknowledges that different treatments may have distinct impacts based on various factors beyond mere feature selection through sparsity constraints, leading to more accurate and robust estimations of CATEs.

How can benign overfitting theory be applied to ensure convergence rates without imposing sparsity

Benign overfitting theory can be applied effectively to ensure convergence rates without imposing sparsity when dealing with high-dimensional data sets where p is large or even infinite. This theory provides a framework that allows appropriate convergence rates even when faced with extremely high dimensions by making specific assumptions about the eigen space structure within the design matrix X.
By leveraging benign overfitting theory, researchers can navigate challenges related to convergence rates without relying solely on sparse conditions which might not always hold true in real-world applications involving vast amounts of data variables. This method offers an alternative path towards achieving reliable estimations and inference results while accommodating intricate structures present within high-dimensional datasets.