The study investigated two hypotheses to explain dormancy phenology in endotherms (mainly hibernating mammals) and ectotherms:
The physiological constraint hypothesis: Dormancy phenology is solely determined by the transition between favorable and unfavorable energetic or thermal conditions. This predicts that species with high sexual dimorphism (a proxy for energy demand) should exhibit greater sex differences in dormancy phenology.
The life-history hypothesis: Dormancy phenology reflects a trade-off between the survival benefits of dormancy and the reproductive benefits of activity. This predicts that the sex difference in dormancy phenology is associated with the sex difference in reproductive investment.
Using phylogenetic comparative analyses, the study found support for both hypotheses:
In accordance with the life-history hypothesis, sex differences in emergence and immergence timing were associated with sex differences in reproductive effort. Males with higher body mass loss during mating showed greater protandry (earlier emergence than females).
Physiological constraints also influenced the trade-off, as smaller species and those in colder environments showed lower sex differences in dormancy phenology, likely due to higher costs of activity.
The study also reviewed evidence from the literature suggesting that dormancy phenology can be independent of energy balance, with some species entering dormancy even when environmental conditions would allow continued activity. This indicates that factors beyond just physiological constraints, such as predation avoidance and competition, influence dormancy timing.
Overall, the findings suggest that dormancy phenology in both endotherms and ectotherms reflects a balance between the survival benefits of dormancy and the reproductive benefits of activity, rather than being solely determined by physiological constraints.
翻譯成其他語言
從原文內容
biorxiv.org
從以下內容提煉的關鍵洞見
by Theo,C., Dob... 於 www.biorxiv.org 07-22-2023
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.07.20.549898v4深入探究