The paper focuses on finding "design-based weights" for causal inference, which do not incorporate any outcome information. Such weights arise in classical observational studies, prospective cohort studies, survey design, and in doubly robust methods that combine outcome and weighting models.
The authors first quantify the information lost by using a weighted estimator based on a representation, rather than the original covariates. They decompose the bias into a "confounding bias" and a "balancing score error", and provide guarantees on the resulting bias of the estimator for any (posited class of the) outcome model.
The authors then develop a method inspired by DeepMatch and RieszNet that learns representations from data, without using any outcome information. Unlike the original RieszNet, the authors do not incorporate outcome information and do not use the final Riesz representer head as the solution weight function, but instead plug the representation into a probability distance to obtain the solution weights.
The authors show promising performance of this approach on benchmark datasets in treatment effect estimation, and argue that the learnt representation can serve as a generic pre-processing method for any weighting method.
翻譯成其他語言
從原文內容
arxiv.org
深入探究