核心概念
Combining ground-level and aerial imagery can improve the prediction of housing quality in Amsterdam.
摘要
The research focuses on using data and models to recognize housing quality in Amsterdam through ground-level and aerial imagery. Google StreetView (GSV) is compared to Flickr images, with GSV showing more accurate building quality predictions. By combining Flickr image features with aerial image features, the performance gap to GSV features is reduced from 30% to 15%. The study aims to find viable alternatives to GSV for predicting liveability factors, as GSV images are challenging to acquire. Urbanization trends emphasize the importance of assessing housing quality for well-being. Ground-level photography offers a scalable solution, while aerial images cover large areas efficiently. The study explores building quality scores at a hectometer scale in Amsterdam by combining different image modalities.
統計資料
Our results show that GSV predicts the most accurate building quality scores, approximately 30% better than using only aerial images.
Flickr image features combined with aerial image features are able to halve the performance gap to GSV features from 30% to 15%.
The dataset consists of 90'256 Google StreetView panorama images and 54'250 geotagged Flickr images taken between 2004 and 2020 in Amsterdam.
The spatial distribution of patches per subset varies, with coverage ranging from 93.69% for Flickr Buildings to 100% for Aerial subset.
引述
"Our results indicate that there are viable alternatives to GSV for liveability factor prediction."
"Using less curated but more easily available social media images such as Flickr can still provide a 15% increase in performance w.r.t. the aerial imagery."