The author argues that using Large Language Models (LLMs) for research and personalized education offers numerous advantages over traditional search methods like Google. Firstly, LLMs provide a record of the user's research process in the form of chat threads, which can be valuable for tracking one's own thinking. Secondly, LLMs have a semantic understanding of the user's queries, their training data, and the internet sources they can access, allowing them to discover relevant information beyond just keyword matching.
The author highlights the text generation and explanatory capabilities of LLMs, which have helped them understand complex and ambiguous issues in various fields, including technology, science, history, politics, and philosophy. The author claims that they now rarely need to use Google for research, as the LLM itself provides ample opportunities for fact-checking and critical thinking. When the LLM's answer is unsatisfactory or raises suspicions of hallucination, the user can ask it to provide evidence and consider alternative viewpoints, as well as to look up additional internet sources.
The author emphasizes that no one who is "slightly smart" would simply believe the first answer an LLM provides, and that the use of LLMs for research and education requires a critical and thoughtful approach.
Іншою мовою
із вихідного контенту
medium.com
Ключові висновки, отримані з
by Paul Pallagh... о medium.com 09-18-2024
https://medium.com/@paul.k.pallaghy/is-anyone-really-not-using-llms-for-research-personalized-education-04ef0f1b9cdfГлибші Запити