Conceitos Básicos
If a graph contains K3,4 as an induced minor, then it must contain a 3-path configuration (theta, prism, or pyramid) as an induced subgraph.
Resumo
The key insights and findings of the content are:
The authors prove that if a graph G contains K3,4 as an induced minor, then G must contain a 3-path configuration (theta, prism, or pyramid) as an induced subgraph. This is done through a detailed structural analysis.
As a consequence, the authors show that excluding a grid and a complete bipartite graph as induced minors is not enough to guarantee a bounded tree-independence number or even that the treewidth is bounded by a function of the size of the maximum clique. This is because the existence of graphs with large treewidth that contain no triangles or thetas as induced subgraphs is already known (the so-called layered wheels).
The authors also prove a more general result, showing that if a graph G contains K3,4 as an induced minor, then G must contain a 3-path configuration (theta, prism, or pyramid) as an induced subgraph. This result is best possible in several ways, as discussed in the content.
The proof of the main theorem relies on a precise description of how K3,3 can be contained as an induced minor in a 3PC-free graph, which is of independent interest.
The authors also prove that if a graph G contains a (5x5)-grid as an induced minor, then G must contain a 3-path configuration as an induced subgraph. This result is easier to obtain than the main theorem.