indsigt - Machine Learning - # Text-to-Speech Synthesis

Continuous Speech Tokenizer for Improved Text-to-Speech Synthesis

Q: How could the continuous speech tokenization approach be adapted and optimized for other speech-related tasks beyond TTS, such as speech recognition or voice conversion?

Continuous speech tokenization offers promising avenues for enhancing various speech-related tasks beyond TTS. Here's how it can be adapted and optimized: 1. Speech Recognition (ASR): Acoustic Modeling: Instead of mapping audio frames to discrete phonemes or graphemes, continuous speech tokens can directly represent the acoustic features. This can lead to a more nuanced representation of speech sounds, potentially improving recognition accuracy, especially for low-resource languages or noisy environments. End-to-End ASR: Continuous tokens can facilitate end-to-end ASR systems where a single model learns to map audio directly to text. The continuous representation can bridge the gap between the acoustic and linguistic information, leading to a more streamlined and efficient training process. 2. Voice Conversion (VC): Speaker Encoding: Continuous speech tokens can capture speaker-specific characteristics more effectively than discrete tokens. By extracting speaker embeddings from these continuous representations, VC systems can achieve more natural and accurate voice transformations. Prosody Control: The continuous nature of the tokens allows for finer control over prosodic elements like pitch, rhythm, and intonation. This can enable VC systems to generate more expressive and emotionally rich speech. Optimization Strategies: Task-Specific Tokenizers: Developing specialized continuous speech tokenizers tailored to the specific requirements of ASR or VC tasks can enhance performance. For instance, an ASR-focused tokenizer might prioritize phonetic information, while a VC-focused tokenizer might emphasize speaker-discriminative features. Multi-Task Learning: Training continuous tokenizers jointly on multiple speech tasks (e.g., TTS, ASR, VC) can encourage the model to learn more general and robust speech representations.

Q: While continuous tokenization preserves more information, could this increased data density pose challenges in terms of computational resources and training efficiency for large-scale models?

Yes, the increased data density associated with continuous speech tokenization can indeed pose challenges in terms of computational resources and training efficiency, particularly for large-scale models. Increased Memory Footprint: Continuous tokens, being higher dimensional than their discrete counterparts, require significantly more memory for storage and processing. This can be a bottleneck, especially when training large models on massive datasets. Computational Complexity: Processing continuous representations often involves more complex operations, leading to increased computational demands during training and inference. This can slow down model training and make it more resource-intensive. Optimization Challenges: Training models with continuous representations can be more challenging due to the lack of sparsity and the potential for vanishing gradients. Specialized optimization techniques and architectures might be needed to address these issues. Mitigation Strategies: Efficient Model Architectures: Exploring more efficient model architectures, such as lightweight convolutional networks or transformers with reduced complexity, can help manage the computational load. Quantization Techniques: Applying quantization techniques to compress the continuous speech tokens without significant information loss can reduce memory footprint and speed up computations. Hardware Acceleration: Leveraging hardware accelerators like GPUs or TPUs specifically designed for handling high-dimensional data and complex computations can significantly improve training efficiency.

Kernekoncepter

Continuous speech tokenization enhances text-to-speech synthesis by preserving more audio information than traditional discrete methods, leading to improved speech continuity, quality, and robustness to sampling rate variations.

Resumé

Bibliographic Information:

Li, Y., Xie, R., Sun, X., Cheng, Y., & Kang, Z. (2024). Continuous Speech Tokenizer in Text To Speech. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.17081.

Research Objective:

This paper investigates the limitations of discrete speech tokenization in text-to-speech (TTS) systems and proposes a novel approach using continuous speech tokens to improve speech synthesis quality and robustness.

Methodology:

The authors develop a continuous speech tokenizer that replaces the traditional Residual Vector Quantization (RVQ) with an embedding module to generate continuous representations of speech tokens. They integrate this tokenizer into a TTS model based on an autoregressive language model and utilize optimal-transport conditional flow matching (OT-CFM) for generating mel-spectrograms from the continuous speech features. The model is trained in two stages: pre-training the tokenizer using a VAE-like approach and joint training the entire model with a focus on language modeling.

Key Findings:

The proposed continuous speech tokenizer-based TTS model outperforms baseline models using discrete tokenizers in terms of Word Error Rate (WER), Speaker Similarity (SIM), Estimated Mean Opinion Score (EMoS), and other speech quality metrics.
Continuous speech tokens demonstrate superior information retention across all frequency bands compared to discrete tokens, particularly in the high-frequency range.
The continuous tokenizer-based model exhibits greater robustness to variations in sampling rate and window length, indicating its ability to handle narrowband data effectively.

Main Conclusions:

The study demonstrates the effectiveness of continuous speech tokenization in enhancing TTS systems. By preserving more audio information, the proposed approach achieves higher speech quality, continuity, and robustness compared to traditional discrete methods.

Significance:

This research contributes to the advancement of TTS technology by introducing a novel and effective approach for speech representation. The findings have implications for developing more natural-sounding and robust TTS systems for various applications.

Limitations and Future Research:

The study primarily focuses on TTS tasks and hasn't been evaluated on Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLM). Future research could explore the application of continuous speech tokenization in MLLMs and address potential challenges related to training complexity and information overload.

Tilpas resumé

Genskriv med AI

Generer citater

Oversæt kilde

Til et andet sprog

Generer mindmap

fra kildeindhold

Besøg kilde

arxiv.org

Statistik

The continuous speech tokenizer retains a higher information transmission rate of 0.55 at 8kHz compared to 0.34 for the discrete tokenizer.
EMoS increased from 0.83 (discrete) to 1.32 (continuous).
CLVP score decreased from 3.52 (discrete) to 2.94 (continuous).
STOI increased from 0.20 (discrete) to 0.42 (continuous).

Citater

"We observe that discrete speech tokenizers have potential information loss in text-to-speech tasks, which is reflected in different degrees of loss in low-frequency and high-frequency components."
"Continuous speech tokens have better information retention than discrete tokens in all frequency bands and better robustness to the sampling rate in text-to-speech tasks."

Vigtigste indsigter udtrukket fra

Continuous Speech Tokenizer in Text To Speech

by Yixing Li, R... kl. arxiv.org 10-23-2024

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2410.17081.pdf

Continuous Speech Tokenizer in Text To Speech

Dybere Forespørgsler

How could the continuous speech tokenization approach be adapted and optimized for other speech-related tasks beyond TTS, such as speech recognition or voice conversion?

Continuous speech tokenization offers promising avenues for enhancing various speech-related tasks beyond TTS. Here's how it can be adapted and optimized:
1. Speech Recognition (ASR):

Acoustic Modeling: Instead of mapping audio frames to discrete phonemes or graphemes, continuous speech tokens can directly represent the acoustic features. This can lead to a more nuanced representation of speech sounds, potentially improving recognition accuracy, especially for low-resource languages or noisy environments.
End-to-End ASR: Continuous tokens can facilitate end-to-end ASR systems where a single model learns to map audio directly to text. The continuous representation can bridge the gap between the acoustic and linguistic information, leading to a more streamlined and efficient training process.
2. Voice Conversion (VC):

Speaker Encoding: Continuous speech tokens can capture speaker-specific characteristics more effectively than discrete tokens. By extracting speaker embeddings from these continuous representations, VC systems can achieve more natural and accurate voice transformations.
Prosody Control: The continuous nature of the tokens allows for finer control over prosodic elements like pitch, rhythm, and intonation. This can enable VC systems to generate more expressive and emotionally rich speech.
Optimization Strategies:

Task-Specific Tokenizers:  Developing specialized continuous speech tokenizers tailored to the specific requirements of ASR or VC tasks can enhance performance. For instance, an ASR-focused tokenizer might prioritize phonetic information, while a VC-focused tokenizer might emphasize speaker-discriminative features.
Multi-Task Learning: Training continuous tokenizers jointly on multiple speech tasks (e.g., TTS, ASR, VC) can encourage the model to learn more general and robust speech representations.

While continuous tokenization preserves more information, could this increased data density pose challenges in terms of computational resources and training efficiency for large-scale models?

Yes, the increased data density associated with continuous speech tokenization can indeed pose challenges in terms of computational resources and training efficiency, particularly for large-scale models.

Increased Memory Footprint: Continuous tokens, being higher dimensional than their discrete counterparts, require significantly more memory for storage and processing. This can be a bottleneck, especially when training large models on massive datasets.
Computational Complexity: Processing continuous representations often involves more complex operations, leading to increased computational demands during training and inference. This can slow down model training and make it more resource-intensive.
Optimization Challenges: Training models with continuous representations can be more challenging due to the lack of sparsity and the potential for vanishing gradients. Specialized optimization techniques and architectures might be needed to address these issues.
Mitigation Strategies:

Efficient Model Architectures: Exploring more efficient model architectures, such as lightweight convolutional networks or transformers with reduced complexity, can help manage the computational load.
Quantization Techniques: Applying quantization techniques to compress the continuous speech tokens without significant information loss can reduce memory footprint and speed up computations.
Hardware Acceleration: Leveraging hardware accelerators like GPUs or TPUs specifically designed for handling high-dimensional data and complex computations can significantly improve training efficiency.

Considering the advancements in speech synthesis, how might this technology be ethically integrated into various aspects of human communication and interaction, such as virtual assistants or accessibility tools, while addressing potential concerns about authenticity and misuse?

The advancements in speech synthesis, particularly with techniques like continuous speech tokenization, offer tremendous potential for enhancing human communication and interaction. However, ethical considerations are paramount to ensure responsible integration.
Positive Applications:

Enhanced Virtual Assistants: More natural and expressive synthetic voices can make interactions with virtual assistants more engaging and human-like.
Accessibility Tools: Speech synthesis can empower individuals with speech impairments by providing them with a voice. It can also assist those with visual impairments by converting text to speech.
Personalized Education: Customized learning experiences can be created by generating synthetic voices that match students' learning preferences.
Ethical Concerns and Mitigation:

Authenticity and Deception: The potential for creating highly realistic synthetic voices raises concerns about misuse for impersonation or spreading misinformation.

Solution: Implementing robust voice authentication systems and developing ethical guidelines for synthetic voice use can help mitigate these risks.


Job Displacement: Widespread adoption of speech synthesis could lead to job displacement in fields like voice acting or customer service.

Solution:  Fostering dialogue between stakeholders to anticipate workforce changes and providing retraining opportunities can help manage this transition.


Bias and Discrimination: If not developed carefully, speech synthesis models can perpetuate existing biases present in training data, leading to discriminatory outcomes.

Solution: Ensuring diverse and representative training datasets and implementing bias detection and mitigation techniques during model development are crucial.
Ethical Integration Principles:

Transparency: Clearly disclosing when a voice is synthetic is essential to maintain trust and prevent deception.
Consent: Obtaining informed consent from individuals before using their voices for synthetic speech generation is crucial.
Beneficence: Prioritizing applications that provide clear benefits to individuals and society should be a guiding principle.
By proactively addressing these ethical considerations, we can harness the power of speech synthesis to enhance communication and interaction while mitigating potential risks.