The content delves into the challenges of missing data in supervised learning, discussing various imputation strategies and their implications. It emphasizes the significance of consistent imputation methods for accurate predictions.
In many application settings, data often have missing entries, posing challenges for subsequent analyses. The article focuses on supervised-learning scenarios where predicting a target variable is hindered by missing values in both training and test data. The study rewrites classic results on missing values for this specific setting and highlights the consistency of different approaches like test-time multiple imputation and single imputation in prediction.
Decision trees are explored as one of the few methods capable of handling empirical risk minimization with missing values due to their ability to manage incomplete variables' half-discrete nature. By empirically comparing various strategies for handling missing values in trees, the study recommends using the "missing incorporated in attribute" method due to its effectiveness with both non-informative and informative missing values.
The article also touches upon key concepts such as Bayes consistency, empirical risk minimization, decision trees, and imputation strategies. It provides insights into how different approaches impact predictive performance when dealing with incomplete data sets.
Overall, the content underscores the importance of selecting appropriate imputation methods that align with learning algorithms to ensure consistent predictions despite missing data challenges.
In eine andere Sprache
aus dem Quellinhalt
arxiv.org
Tiefere Fragen