Información - Human-Computer Interaction - # User Acceptance of Explanations in eXplainable AI (XAI) Systems

The Impact of User Personality and Technological Comfort on Acceptance of Explanations in AI-based Systems

Q: How can XAI systems dynamically adjust explanation levels based on real-time monitoring of user personality and technological comfort?

To dynamically adjust explanation levels in XAI systems based on real-time monitoring of user personality and technological comfort, several strategies can be implemented: User Profiling: XAI systems can create user profiles that include information about the user's personality traits, such as neuroticism and conscientiousness, as well as their level of technological comfort. By continuously updating and refining these profiles through user interactions, the system can better understand individual preferences and needs. Real-time Feedback: XAI systems can incorporate real-time feedback mechanisms to gather data on user reactions to different levels of explanations. By analyzing how users respond to varying explanation types, the system can adapt and tailor the explanations to better suit each user's preferences. Machine Learning Algorithms: Utilizing machine learning algorithms, XAI systems can learn from user interactions and adjust the explanation levels accordingly. By training models on user feedback data, the system can predict the most effective explanation type for each user based on their personality traits and technological comfort. Contextual Adaptation: XAI systems can take into account the context of the interaction to determine the appropriate explanation level. For example, in situations where a user is under time constraints or stress, the system may provide more concise explanations to accommodate their needs. Personalized Settings: Providing users with the option to customize their explanation preferences can also enhance the system's ability to dynamically adjust explanation levels. Users can set their preferred level of detail, allowing the system to adapt explanations accordingly. By implementing these strategies, XAI systems can effectively tailor explanation levels to individual users based on their personality traits and technological comfort in real-time, enhancing user experience and collaboration with AI systems.

Q: What are the potential drawbacks or unintended consequences of providing minimal explanations to users with high neuroticism and low technological comfort?

While providing minimal explanations to users with high neuroticism and low technological comfort may seem beneficial in reducing information overload and perceived complexity, there are potential drawbacks and unintended consequences to consider: Misinterpretation: Users with high neuroticism may be more prone to misinterpreting or overthinking information. Providing minimal explanations could lead to misunderstandings or increased anxiety if users feel uncertain about the AI's decisions. Lack of Trust: Users with low technological comfort may already have limited trust in technology. Providing minimal explanations may further erode trust in the AI system, as users may feel disconnected or skeptical about the decision-making process. Limited Engagement: Minimal explanations may result in users disengaging from the AI system, especially if they feel that their information needs are not being met. This could hinder user collaboration and adoption of AI technologies. Reduced Transparency: Minimal explanations may compromise the transparency of AI systems, making it challenging for users to understand the rationale behind the AI's recommendations. This lack of transparency could lead to decreased user confidence in the system. User Frustration: Users with high neuroticism and low technological comfort may become frustrated if they feel that the AI system is not providing sufficient information to support their decision-making process. This frustration could impact user satisfaction and overall experience. Considering these potential drawbacks, it is essential for XAI systems to strike a balance between providing minimal explanations and ensuring that users with high neuroticism and low technological comfort receive adequate support and information to foster trust and engagement.

Q: How might the findings of this study apply to other domains beyond AI-based classification systems, such as decision support tools or intelligent personal assistants?

The findings of this study on the influence of personality traits and technological comfort on user agreement with AI recommendations can be extrapolated to various domains beyond AI-based classification systems: Decision Support Tools: In decision support tools, understanding user personality traits and comfort levels with technology can help tailor the presentation of information and recommendations. Users with different traits may require varying levels of detail and explanation to make informed decisions. Intelligent Personal Assistants: Intelligent personal assistants can benefit from personalized explanations based on user characteristics. By adapting the level of detail and context of explanations to individual preferences, personal assistants can enhance user satisfaction and engagement. Healthcare Systems: In healthcare systems, considering patient personality traits and technological comfort can improve the delivery of medical information and treatment recommendations. Personalized explanations can empower patients to make informed decisions about their health. Financial Services: In the financial services sector, understanding user traits and comfort levels can enhance the effectiveness of financial advice and investment recommendations. Tailoring explanations to individual preferences can build trust and confidence in financial decision-making. By applying the insights from this study to various domains, organizations can design more user-centric systems that cater to individual needs and preferences, ultimately improving user collaboration and acceptance of AI technologies.

Conceptos Básicos

Individuals with higher neuroticism and lower technological comfort prefer AI classifications without explanations, while conscientiousness does not significantly impact explanation preferences.

Resumen

This study investigates how user personality traits (neuroticism and conscientiousness) and technological comfort influence their acceptance of different types of explanations (no explanation, placebic, and meaningful) provided by an AI classifier system.

The key findings are:

Participants with lower technological comfort agreed more with the AI classifier's recommendations when no explanations were provided, compared to when meaningful explanations were given. This suggests that users with low technological comfort prefer minimal information from XAI systems.
Participants with higher neuroticism also agreed more with the AI classifier's recommendations when no explanations were provided, compared to when meaningful or placebic explanations were given. This indicates that individuals with higher emotional volatility prefer less information from XAI systems.
Contrary to the hypothesis, conscientiousness did not significantly impact participants' preferences for the different explanation types. This suggests that conscientiousness may not directly influence reactions to varying explanation levels in XAI systems.

The findings highlight the importance of considering user personality traits and technological comfort when designing XAI systems. Providing personalized explanation levels based on user profiles can enhance user acceptance and collaboration with AI technologies.

Personalizar resumen

Reescribir con IA

Generar citas

Traducir fuente

A otro idioma

Generar mapa mental

del contenido fuente

Ver fuente

arxiv.org

Estadísticas

Participants with lower technological comfort agreed more with the AI classifier's recommendations when no explanations were provided, compared to when meaningful explanations were given.
Participants with higher neuroticism agreed more with the AI classifier's recommendations when no explanations were provided, compared to when meaningful or placebic explanations were given.

Citas

"Individuals with higher neuroticism and low-tech comfort tend to prefer minimal or no explanations."
"Psychologically informed approaches to AI-based systems are recommended, highlighting the importance of personalizing explanations based on user traits to improve acceptance and adaptation to AI technologies."

Ideas clave extraídas de

The Drawback of Insight: Detailed Explanations Can Reduce Agreement with XAI

by Sabid Bin Ha... a las arxiv.org 05-01-2024

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2404.19629.pdf

The Drawback of Insight: Detailed Explanations Can Reduce Agreement with XAI

Consultas más profundas

How can XAI systems dynamically adjust explanation levels based on real-time monitoring of user personality and technological comfort?

To dynamically adjust explanation levels in XAI systems based on real-time monitoring of user personality and technological comfort, several strategies can be implemented:

User Profiling: XAI systems can create user profiles that include information about the user's personality traits, such as neuroticism and conscientiousness, as well as their level of technological comfort. By continuously updating and refining these profiles through user interactions, the system can better understand individual preferences and needs.

Real-time Feedback: XAI systems can incorporate real-time feedback mechanisms to gather data on user reactions to different levels of explanations. By analyzing how users respond to varying explanation types, the system can adapt and tailor the explanations to better suit each user's preferences.

Machine Learning Algorithms: Utilizing machine learning algorithms, XAI systems can learn from user interactions and adjust the explanation levels accordingly. By training models on user feedback data, the system can predict the most effective explanation type for each user based on their personality traits and technological comfort.

Contextual Adaptation: XAI systems can take into account the context of the interaction to determine the appropriate explanation level. For example, in situations where a user is under time constraints or stress, the system may provide more concise explanations to accommodate their needs.

Personalized Settings: Providing users with the option to customize their explanation preferences can also enhance the system's ability to dynamically adjust explanation levels. Users can set their preferred level of detail, allowing the system to adapt explanations accordingly.

By implementing these strategies, XAI systems can effectively tailor explanation levels to individual users based on their personality traits and technological comfort in real-time, enhancing user experience and collaboration with AI systems.

What are the potential drawbacks or unintended consequences of providing minimal explanations to users with high neuroticism and low technological comfort?

While providing minimal explanations to users with high neuroticism and low technological comfort may seem beneficial in reducing information overload and perceived complexity, there are potential drawbacks and unintended consequences to consider:

Misinterpretation: Users with high neuroticism may be more prone to misinterpreting or overthinking information. Providing minimal explanations could lead to misunderstandings or increased anxiety if users feel uncertain about the AI's decisions.

Lack of Trust: Users with low technological comfort may already have limited trust in technology. Providing minimal explanations may further erode trust in the AI system, as users may feel disconnected or skeptical about the decision-making process.

Limited Engagement: Minimal explanations may result in users disengaging from the AI system, especially if they feel that their information needs are not being met. This could hinder user collaboration and adoption of AI technologies.

Reduced Transparency: Minimal explanations may compromise the transparency of AI systems, making it challenging for users to understand the rationale behind the AI's recommendations. This lack of transparency could lead to decreased user confidence in the system.

User Frustration: Users with high neuroticism and low technological comfort may become frustrated if they feel that the AI system is not providing sufficient information to support their decision-making process. This frustration could impact user satisfaction and overall experience.

Considering these potential drawbacks, it is essential for XAI systems to strike a balance between providing minimal explanations and ensuring that users with high neuroticism and low technological comfort receive adequate support and information to foster trust and engagement.

How might the findings of this study apply to other domains beyond AI-based classification systems, such as decision support tools or intelligent personal assistants?

The findings of this study on the influence of personality traits and technological comfort on user agreement with AI recommendations can be extrapolated to various domains beyond AI-based classification systems:

Decision Support Tools: In decision support tools, understanding user personality traits and comfort levels with technology can help tailor the presentation of information and recommendations. Users with different traits may require varying levels of detail and explanation to make informed decisions.

Intelligent Personal Assistants: Intelligent personal assistants can benefit from personalized explanations based on user characteristics. By adapting the level of detail and context of explanations to individual preferences, personal assistants can enhance user satisfaction and engagement.

Healthcare Systems: In healthcare systems, considering patient personality traits and technological comfort can improve the delivery of medical information and treatment recommendations. Personalized explanations can empower patients to make informed decisions about their health.

Financial Services: In the financial services sector, understanding user traits and comfort levels can enhance the effectiveness of financial advice and investment recommendations. Tailoring explanations to individual preferences can build trust and confidence in financial decision-making.

By applying the insights from this study to various domains, organizations can design more user-centric systems that cater to individual needs and preferences, ultimately improving user collaboration and acceptance of AI technologies.