toplogo
Kirjaudu sisään

User Identification Accuracy Using Eye Tracking Data in Non-Laboratory Settings


Keskeiset käsitteet
Achieving high accuracy in user identification using eye tracking data in non-laboratory settings.
Tiivistelmä

The study introduces a new dataset of "free roaming" and "targeted roaming" scenarios, where participants walk around a university campus or locate specific rooms within a library. The accuracy of user identification using a machine learning pipeline with a Radial Basis Function Network (RBFN) classifier is investigated, yielding accuracies of 87.3% for free roaming and 89.4% for targeted roaming. Results show the impact of trajectory length on accuracies, with best results obtained from specific durations cut from the end of trajectories. Higher order velocity derivatives are also explored to enhance identification accuracy. The study compares results with previous research conducted in laboratory settings, highlighting the feasibility and advantages of non-laboratory settings for user identification studies.

edit_icon

Mukauta tiivistelmää

edit_icon

Kirjoita tekoälyn avulla

edit_icon

Luo viitteet

translate_icon

Käännä lähde

visual_icon

Luo miellekartta

visit_icon

Siirry lähteeseen

Tilastot
Our highest accuracies are 87.3% for free roaming and 89.4% for targeted roaming. The minimum duration of each recording is 263s for free roaming and 154s for targeted roaming. Accuracies are lower when cutting the same length from the beginning of trajectories. The RBFN classifier with k = 32 consistently achieves better accuracies compared to other classifiers. ANOVA analysis identifies fixation duration as a top feature for both datasets.
Lainaukset

Tärkeimmät oivallukset

by Rishabh Vall... klo arxiv.org 03-15-2024

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2403.09415.pdf
User Identification via Free Roaming Eye Tracking Data

Syvällisempiä Kysymyksiä

How can the findings of user identification accuracy in non-laboratory settings be applied to real-world scenarios?

The findings of user identification accuracy in non-laboratory settings have significant implications for real-world applications. By demonstrating high accuracies in identifying users based on eye movements outside controlled environments, such as university campuses or libraries, this research opens up possibilities for practical implementations. Real-world scenarios where user identification is crucial, like security systems, personalized services, and human-computer interaction interfaces, can benefit from these advancements. For instance, implementing user identification via free roaming eye tracking data could enhance security measures by providing a more natural and unobtrusive way to authenticate individuals without the need for explicit actions like entering passwords or using biometric scanners.

What potential limitations exist when conducting user identification studies solely in laboratory environments?

While laboratory environments offer controlled conditions that are conducive to precise measurements and standardized procedures, they also come with inherent limitations when studying user identification. One major limitation is the lack of ecological validity - behaviors observed in a lab setting may not accurately reflect how individuals behave in real-world situations. Participants' responses and eye movements might differ when they are aware of being monitored compared to their natural behavior outside the lab. Additionally, factors such as limited sample diversity (often consisting of college students), constrained tasks or stimuli used during experiments, and artificial setups may restrict the generalizability of findings to broader populations or everyday contexts.

How can eye tracking technology advancements further enhance user identification research beyond traditional methods?

Advancements in eye tracking technology hold immense potential for advancing user identification research beyond traditional methods. Higher sampling rates provided by modern eye trackers enable capturing finer details of eye movements with greater precision and accuracy. This enhanced data quality allows researchers to extract more nuanced features related to gaze patterns and dynamics for improved classification algorithms. Moreover, innovations like wearable eye trackers offer mobility and flexibility for data collection in diverse settings without compromising measurement quality. Furthermore, integrating machine learning techniques with advanced eye tracking capabilities enables sophisticated analysis of complex gaze behaviors that were previously challenging to interpret manually. Deep learning models trained on large-scale datasets generated from state-of-the-art eye trackers can uncover subtle patterns indicative of individual differences in gaze behavior for robust user identification systems. Overall, ongoing technological developments pave the way for more reliable and efficient approaches towards leveraging eye tracking data for accurate user recognition across various applications.
0
star