Keskeiset käsitteet
Observing an AI driving coach can effectively teach novice drivers performance driving skills, with the type and modality of explanatory information provided by the coach influencing learning outcomes.
Tiivistelmä
The study explored the impact of observing an AI driving coach on driving performance, cognitive load, confidence, expertise, and trust. Participants were divided into four groups to assess the effects of the coach's explanatory information type ('what' and 'why') and presentation modality (auditory and visual).
The results show that observing the AI coach can improve novice drivers' performance, including faster lap times, higher speeds, and better acceleration. However, the specific type and modality of information provided by the coach influenced the learning outcomes.
Groups that received 'what' information, either auditory or visual, showed the most improvement in following the ideal racing line, a key performance metric. Groups that received both 'what' and 'why' information saw benefits in other areas like speed and acceleration, but the auditory presentation of this information led to higher cognitive load and feelings of being overwhelmed.
The visual presentation of 'what' information, combined with auditory 'why' explanations, appeared to be the most effective approach, allowing participants to learn the racing line while also understanding the reasoning behind optimal driving techniques.
Interviews revealed that the type and modality of information influenced how participants' attention was directed, how uncertainty was mitigated, and how cognitive load was managed. These factors impacted the learning process and the ultimate performance outcomes.
The study provides insights into designing effective human-machine interfaces (HMIs) for AI-based driving instruction and coaching. Key design considerations include balancing information thoroughness and efficiency, using modality-appropriate presentations to minimize uncertainty, and personalizing the interactions to the individual learner's needs and preferences.
Tilastot
Participants in Group 2 (auditory 'what' explanations) improved less on lap time, max speed, and average acceleration compared to the control group.
Participants in Groups 2 and 4 (visual 'what' + auditory 'why' explanations) showed the greatest improvements in distance from the ideal racing line compared to the control group.
Across all groups, there were significant pre-post improvements in lap time, max speed, and average acceleration.
Lainaukset
"The path on the track was very helpful. [It] helped me feel more comfortable and confident."
"Substantial", "overwhelming", and "a lot" were used to describe the amount of auditory information presented in Group 3.
"It was hard to know what the important parts are [with observation alone]."